Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rome2000

The PATRIOT Act unconstitutionally infringes on the civil liberties of Americans while not providing any useful result.

Most of the GOP is too concerned about elections and looking ‘soft on terrorism’ to even consider voting against something called the PATRIOT Act. Of those, a good majority voted for the original when GWB proposed it, and have defended it ever since. Politically, they can’t admit that it was a terrible idea from day 1.


15 posted on 02/08/2011 5:49:12 PM PST by Domalais
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Domalais

I wouldn’t call it a terrible proposal from Day 1. as I said in my previous post, we have no idea how many threats were actually thwarted that we have no idea about. This is column of our anti-terrorism policy that is being chopped out from underneath; the first was Obama’s nullification of the enhanced interrogation techniques. I am disheartened by the unfortunate lack of connection these Republicans made between national security and this Act. I do not see this as a politically divisive point in the Republican party, not yet at least. I just pray that all that say this did nothing were not wrong, and that we are not hit by another 9-11 magnitude attack. And please, don’t make a point out of Ft. Hood and Nidal Hassan, that was a totally different screw up by the Army, unfortunately.


35 posted on 02/08/2011 6:49:44 PM PST by FutureRocketMan (Protect America, in the most effective way possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Domalais

Yes, it just gave the justice department the tools for spy on terrorists and kept us safe. That’s all.


57 posted on 02/09/2011 2:23:07 AM PST by JaneNC (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson