Posted on 02/09/2011 8:07:50 AM PST by RobinMasters
Can you summarize her theories on the connection between OKC and 9-11?
Here’s what the KOmmies had to say about “Honorary Serb”:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/4/9/124448/2868
If they can apply such twisted illogic and false assumptions to me, they can do the same to Ronald Reagan. (One of them even started to learn something from me, but then threw it all away.)
These guys are complete dolts who think that they are the intelligentsia.
I agree.. I think Oklahoma City and Flight 800 should be reopened and investigated.. But I am pissing in the wind because the republicants are spineless wimps..
Indeed!
LLS
bttt
“... Looking through the glass bottom boat into the dailykos sewer, we read this turdly observation (via LGF):
“As an American, I was stunned and embarrassed by Bollinger’s harangue of Ahmedinejad. It was a craven and cowardly capitulation to political pressures, and unworthy of the academic institution that Bollinger represents.... Bollinger’s speech was less a challenge to Ahmedinejad than it was an ambush, and it dishonered all of us as Americans. Bollinger could have challenged Ahmedinejad’s many hyperbolic and absurd statements in a manner that was not abusive and insulting. He chose instead to curry favor with those who are intent on demonizing Iran and plunging the U.S. into another illegal and immoral war. Bollinger’s behavior was inappropriate. It presented to the world the face of an ugly and bullying America. I am utterly humiliated that Bollinger should have behaved this way.”
You see? You can’t win when dealing with the left. This is the identical unconscious dynamic that causes the abused woman to rescue her abuser from the rescuer. As another kossack o’ you-know-what put it, “No wonder those that are beating the war drums against Iran didn’t want Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak any place American might hear him. Thanks to Columbia University and CPAN he was heard by many. He sounds entirely to reasonable. Hearing his own word doesn’t help the cause of demonizing him as a madman and the most recent Hitler. This is someone we definitely should be talking to.”
Islamism and the left. It’s a marriage made in hell. ....”
HERE:
Marriage Counseling Between Islamists and the Left
http://onecosmos.blogspot.com/2007/09/marriage-counseling-between-islamists.html
doublethink
Read it and weep for our country. Clinton was more worried about his popularty ratings than getting to the bottom of this.
http://www.jaynadavis.com/highlights.html
While considering Reagan-McVeigh, who inspired Karl Armstrong in 1970, when he blew up Sterling Hall with an ANFO truck bomb?
That doesn’t maan that McVey did not use terrorists to accomplish his mission
it time to write some advertisers
it time to write some advertisers
Kos is a loathesome little evil fagola Marxist drama queen.
“First elected Governor on a muted inclination to shoot student demonstrators”
Well, at least it was muted.
“His genial Irish confidence-man’s twinkle”
Racist!
“’Tear down this wall’ was as hubristic as if Gorbachev had told Reagan to stop imprisoning so many black people”
Gorby: You should imprison everyone, like us.
“’I paid for this microphone’ helped him get nominated in 1980, even though the dispute was over the agreed rules, not the payments”
This is precisely why comedy should never be analyzed.
Except, perhaps, to distinguish the physical from the verbal, and the intelligent from the dumb. Those are healthy distinctions.
“Yeah, I guess to a kommie, imprisoning ‘so many’ black criminals is worse than walling off a country to keep people from escaping communism.”
You just know he’s the sort of person who could never understand your excellent point, which more than anything makes me sad.
When you give decent, law-abiding men and women not legal logical redress, you openly invite and deserve insurrection and revolution.
“The gov’t’ is always quick to claim that there was only one person involved no matter what it is. Kennedy, MLK, Bobby K. Okla. city. They permit NO other theory.”
I suppose no other theories were pursued by the Warren Commission, and a little less than a year counts as “quick.” Not to say anything about the Oklahoma City Bombing, but as regards Kennedy, sometimes the conclusion is that obvious.
As proof, I offer the fact that despite nearly 50 years of endless investigation—ranging from soberly considered to wildly bonkers—not a single piece of relevant hard evidence has been found to contradict the Commission’s conclusions. There is new witness testimony—which can be taken for what they’re worth—and there are mistakes in the Report—which can be explained by a reevaluation of the Commission’s evidence. But that’s all.
Even if the Warren Commission was a put-on, it was a remarkably thorough put-on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.