To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Why are Ron Paul's supporters so, generally, rude and antisocial?
They have a right to their opinions, of course, but they remind me of “code pink” or other Leftie organizations -— they do not respect our right to disagree with them!
2 posted on
02/13/2011 8:46:09 AM PST by
Kansas58
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
3 posted on
02/13/2011 8:50:19 AM PST by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
A prominent conservative activist group has given Ron Paul the boot. As well they should.
Ron Paul is no conservative.
5 posted on
02/13/2011 8:52:34 AM PST by
Allegra
(Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Don’t much care where they kick Ron Paul
6 posted on
02/13/2011 8:55:14 AM PST by
bigbob
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
From the comments left at Politico,
"Ron Paul had it right when he said that the system renames everything the opposite of what it really is."Yes, and including claiming Ron Paul is a "conservative" or a "Patriot."
Plain and simple, he's a nutcase cult leader leading a bunch of other nutcases around by the nose.
If the Paultards have their way, we'll see four more years of Obama.
9 posted on
02/13/2011 9:04:50 AM PST by
DakotaRed
(Why not just pass a law requiring criminals to obey the laws?)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
This guy (ron paul) has always been on the outside edge of sanity.....i consider myself a small “L” libertarian / conservative / strict constitutionalist...but, this guy gives us all a bad name....I hate to say it, but he should just go away, like gingrich should...and romney.....and mcpain....and many others to numerous to list here
10 posted on
02/13/2011 9:06:03 AM PST by
joe fonebone
(The House has oversight of the Judiciary...why are the rogue judges not being impeached?)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Most of Ron Paul’s supporters are college-aged men who want to feel justified in their refusal to serve their country. Like the draft dodgers of the 60s, they can mask their cowardice with claims of noble philosophical disagreement. But you know they’re liberals because only a liberal would call out Dick Cheney as a “war criminal.” That’s a give-away that they’re really just liberals who’ve infiltrated CPAC.
11 posted on
02/13/2011 9:06:56 AM PST by
MNnice
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I'm not a huge Ron Paul fan or anything but it seems to me he's not so much anti-war as he is anti-quagmire.
I highly doubt Paul is opposed to American defending herself when necessary.
I don't know that for sure.
26 posted on
02/13/2011 9:27:54 AM PST by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Great news, great explanation!
45 posted on
02/13/2011 10:16:05 AM PST by
hocndoc
(http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.) (RIAing)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
46 posted on
02/13/2011 10:19:38 AM PST by
kanawa
(Obama - "The only people who don't want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.")
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Pul voted yes : To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States
We will still be chasing " those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States." as Iraq becomes a distant memory.
Paul's talk doesn't match his votes.
His vote DADT is one such example.
53 posted on
02/13/2011 1:11:06 PM PST by
NoLibZone
(Obama must be impeached and tried for treason.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Well, we’ll see. It could be that YAF is just making room on its board for a blatant Log Cabin type.
56 posted on
02/13/2011 2:52:04 PM PST by
Walts Ice Pick
("I'm not going to shut up!" - Sarah Palin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
