Posted on 02/13/2011 4:07:10 PM PST by cj in tx
There is a lot of buzz in the conservative air this week, over what may be considered either corruptive or divisive in the ranks, at the current CPAC conference. From any moment to the next, it may be about one group’s promotion of homosexuality, or another man’s, Grover Norquist’s, apparent Islamist activism, in conjunction with his Muslim wife.
Norquist has done much good, but his aims and influence are exemplary of what is has been harmful and corruptive in conservatism for a very long while. That is not because of his marital relations, but because he is married to unbalanced transnationalism. And though he is touted as a principal force for small government conservatism and big tent unity, he opens the door to the biggest government of all and thus becomes a very divisive factor, indeed. Not to worry though, this is not a personal diatribe. With your permission, a much broader point is to be made, featuring him only for the example.
Knowingly or not, Mr. Norquist is an operative for unifying conservatives to conserve the path to selling out America, by the century old, relativist, communitarian, and globalist model of the likes of Morgan/Rockefeller/H.Ford/Bush. And now, this plan is nearly complete, with George Soros, Maurice Strong, and Ban Ki-moon, two nation destroying Marxists and one more coy in his rhetoric, leading the way. (And as good Marxists, of course they have used their Soviet and Nazi trained Islamists among their many pawns, coincidentally for Norquist - Soviet link - Soviet link - Nazi links.) These globalist Marxists view small government transnationalists as dupes, because that is what they are. And that is so, because where national sovereignty is broken down, global governance is there, to fill the vacuum as if by physics, but please hold that thought.
The fact of Norquist's Islamist activism is just a toss-in, here (chronological links: 1, 2, 3, 4). To wrap-up the distastefully personal display of one man as a prime example of so many who place blind faith in the business is good business, wherever you find it model, still so prevalent in the Republican Party:
Whether they realize it or not, operators such as this, functionally if not by ideology, are transnational progressives on the vanguard, wolves to herd the sheep. And their big tent is so huge, it stretches over a false vision of a unified yet somehow free world. Such conservatives find themselves supporting communitarians such as George W. Bush, who inadvertently (or by plan from the outset ) wind up supporting more and more suzerainty to world empire. But, if not the wolf and sheep allusion, does it smell fishy?
Transnationalism becomes global communitarianism, becomes worldwide communism, as the little fish nations are gobbled up by the manipulative, big fish seekers of absolute, New World Order power; all, while that ultimate power “corrupts absolutely.” (If “communism” sounds extreme, just call it collectivism, neo-Marxism, or Marxofascism; it is the same. Or, if you don’t like the more recently coined words, find the root and call it Babel.)
Now, thankfully, we have gotten well beyond a singling out of the illustrative Mr. Norquist -- plenty of fish in the sea of the power brokering of conservatives' hard work and trust. But where ranks the salvaging of our very existence as a free nation, on the list of CPAC priorities?
Overriding or deconstructing the fact of the American nation is treason and we have been warned about it from all prior generations. Realizing this shows we need a new paradigm in the Soft War against American Sovereignties* -- the real paradigm. Words without an objective core, such as "conservative" and "liberal" do not fit American vs. anti-American conflict. Conservative transnational... conservative communitarian... please.
The true contest breaks between those who stand for authentic America's Sovereignties and resultant freedoms,* versus those who uphold any number of bait-on-the-hook ideals of globalism and for whom America is in the way and must be "fundamentally transformed," inevitably reduced, like a sauce in the pan.
So, CPAC activists and C-word onlookers: what do you know, of what have you warned others, about the global, "sustainable development" plan of Agenda 21? It is being imposed upon our local neighborhoods, after all. "Think globally, act locally" is no mere bumper sticker notion.
What of the rest of the standards of violence to our nation, such as the "Global Governance 2025" plan, or the "Law of the Sea Treaty?" "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change?" Or, "Treaty on Small Arms?" How about the U.N. Convention on the "Rights of the Child," or their efforts for a global "Treaty on Women?" Or, have you glanced at what our dictatorially imposed "czar" infrastructure is doing, to connect with global governance and "seize the future?" There is more.
We must realize the war waged against us and... fight that war. Determine who would truly represent us, through dynamically renewing America, of, by, and for our Sovereignties, then push with those spearheads. Know and warn of the real threat, because it has "progressed" much further than a threat. If we fail to change accordingly, we charge into the burning store we run, only to change the clothing on the mannequins in the windows.
The Republican Party, along with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and the bed of corruption that is the Managed Funds Association, as many institutions, NGO's, and SIG's, must be enlightened and reformed, disciplined to reality and truth, or be politically and legally purged -- or be replaced. Our entire view of the world and ourselves in it, must be refined in reality.
Too many gave their lifeblood, for this soft insurrection to continue without our lives put on the line seeing where the line must be drawn.
If we fail, where else will the war be fought?
Americans, be Americans. The whole world needs us to be Americans.
_______________________________________
* The American Sovereignties include:
Graphic, "Fish Eating Fish Eating..." by Frits Ahlefeldt
He asks you to communicate with your neighbors, and to confront our politicians and candidates with “The Three SOVEREIGNTY NOW Questions.”
Contact him at ArlenWilliams@GulagBound.com.
Whether I give permission to repost or not is my business. Your pinging CJ fm TX is not welcome, thanks.
On the other hand, I don't appreciate the attempt at obfuscation, at all.
I don’t suggest you bring race into this, whether with a forehand or backhand. That is just untoward.
And please don’t bring charges of groundless conspiracy theory into it either, unless you specify what you believe is not fact that is shown as such, and why you disbelieve it..
The connection between Zionists and Soros has been well documented.
Hatred is a connection? Soros is an atheist who has been attacking Israel for a generation. He hates Jews and Judaism and considered his time aiding the roundup of Hungarian Jews the best of his life. So please do show us your sources.
There is clearly, clearly a vast global conspiracy between the elements I presented in my post, globalists, Islamists, bankers, jihadists, nazis, communists, federal reservists who also seek to tear down this nation.
Has it occured to you that there are multiple competing conspiracies?
Did you see how VP Cheney was boo’d? Did you hear what they said about Rumsfeld?
Who? The Fed-hating Libertarians?
The OP reflects this quite well. And yes, Coulter is in cahoots with these same forces
Check you water filter.
bookmark
MadIsh was only kidding. I have apologized to him, to the Moderator, and to everyone.
Norquist is another blank slate theory crackpot extremist.
I think Coulter has always been a “cocktail party decoration”. She exists to entertain or inflame thoughts and words so nothing “real” is discussed, only the manner of the presentation.
Good article.
Clearly the article posted was full of facts as well as opinion, but the opinions stated were not pulled from the ether. They were distilled in the brain of one with common sense and the facts, and skill to put it to paper.
Regarding Ann Coulter, people have varying opinions about her, but it is clear that she exists to bring scorn upon conservative thinking America. Just as Archie Bunker was foisted upon the nation, to show how middle class America was bigoted beyond belief. Ms Coulter exists to tee off the left, and women in particular, while providing just enough truth to satisfy a hungry group looking for conservative realism. All the while she dates and friends those on the very left that she "belittles". In my opinion, she does not believe what she says, and is just as fine a performer as Carol O'Connor ever was.
There seems to be a lot of this going around. From a President that claims to be a fiscal conservative, both doubling the debt in 8 years, to hiding the cost of war off budget to further keep the citizens from being informed. To Grover Norquist, or Michael Medved, who while citing "conservatism" as a guiding principle, in reality only want power for "their side", as electoral victory is the only goal worth achieving, no matter the ruins left in victories wake.
I pose these responses and questions to you, in hope that you will turn your gift of prose to thoughtful response. Your words left the impression of intentional obfuscation, how about you tell what you really think?
The picture makes one thing very clear - Grover either needs to learn how to shave, or to grow a beard. The 1/4” of beard look, while common these days, sucks !
The Muslim religion does not let a Muslim woman marry a non-Muslim man unless the man converts to Islam. There have been many cases of women being “honor killed” because they dared marry a non-Muslim. There has been a recent case in Pakistan in which a Muslim woman married a Hindu man and were hunted down and I think actually killed because they wanted to marry. The Pakistani Muslim female star of Slumdog Millionaire had to flee from her father and brother because she dated a non-Muslim. They allow Muslim men to marry non-Muslim women because the man is in control in the relationship and this is a way of breeding more Muslims. But Muslim women marrying non-Muslim men are a definate no-no.
Maybe we should start calling ourselves the Sovereignty movement rather than the Conservative movement since the word Conservative has been co-opted by so many imposters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.