Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Supreme Court has been compelled to hold a new hearing on Obama’s eligibility.
HillBuzz ^ | February 17,2011 | Kevin DuJan

Posted on 02/17/2011 8:31:53 PM PST by dalight

Drudge has linked this story from World Net Daily that notes the odd decision by the Supreme Court to hold a new “conference” on Obama’s eligibility to hold the presidency.

Let’s research WHY the court could be compelled to do this.

It MUST have something to do with the fact that Obama has no birth certificate on file in the Hawaiian Hall of Records with the name “Barack Hussein Obama” on it — since his original Hawaiian birth certificate with that name was sealed in the 1970s when he was adopted in Indonesia by Lolo Soetoro, his stepfather. At the time of adoption, a child’s original birth certificate is sealed away and replaced in the Hall of Records by a new birth certificate that bears the adopted parents’ names and the child’s new name, if a new name is given.

This is what happened to Obama, when he was renamed “Soetobakh” by his mother and stepfather at the time of adoption.

(Excerpt) Read more at hillbuzz.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; hillbuzz; ineligible; naturalborncitizen; obama; soetobakh; unconstitutional; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-415 next last
To: smokingfrog

“Soetobakh ?”

That’s a new one I haven’t seen before!


21 posted on 02/17/2011 8:57:01 PM PST by Batman11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pacpam
When BHO was adopted, Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship.

Though this is certainly true, it only a part of the current kerfuffle. Obama and company hide this and they concentrate on the Birth Certificate because they can haul out this piece of crap and dare folks to make a beef about it which folks apparently have decided will fall somewhere in the gray area when they consider the wrong name issue by itself. The problem is that it is likely the SOB may not even be a Citizen in spite of the ease it would have been to re-establish it. Or perhaps he is, but under his legal name, not BHO.

Worse, he very likely took advantage of foreign tuition breaks when he went to college, hence, the hiding of these records. It is a house of cards.

22 posted on 02/17/2011 8:58:10 PM PST by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: manc

“What a bunch of cowards we have in our corrupt biased media and yet this guy and Hannity say they’re looking out for us.
Yea right”

Americans have been dumbed down to moron level.
That is why I left.

If Americans do not wake up, there will be no America by 2012.


23 posted on 02/17/2011 8:59:23 PM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
Just answer the damn question. Was Obama actually born in Hawaii?

This is another question that just aches. Everything seems to be consistent with the proposed explanation that Obama's original Hawaii Birth Certificate was a result of a affidavit filed by his grandparents.

24 posted on 02/17/2011 9:01:45 PM PST by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Batman11

Me neither. Haven’t of that name before. We truly are screwed that this POSUS has so many different aliases.


25 posted on 02/17/2011 9:01:45 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
That question is a distraction. The REAL question is whether he is an NBC. The facts on that issue almost incontrovertibly point to “NO.”

The funny thing is that if you read the State Department's own manual on citizenship they specifically separate the definition of Natural Born citizen from Naturalized and Birthright Citizenship.

26 posted on 02/17/2011 9:03:52 PM PST by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dalight

What I wasn’t aware of that DuJan points out in his post on Hillbuzz is that at least 10 states, with more on the horizon, are underway to enacting a legislative requirement to provide a Certificate of Live Birth for name access to that’s state’s ballot. I had no idea it was 10 or more. I’d read the White House was extremely concerned about this. They planned on having only 1 or 2 states enact this requirement and then label them as racist states. But when 10 or more plan on it, then the “racist” brush won’t paint a swath that wide and resonate.

Anyone know which states are thinking of doing this, and are any of them close enough to getting it done?


27 posted on 02/17/2011 9:07:07 PM PST by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Oreilly is as ignorant as he is arrogant. You would think that Obama’s refusal to release such an ordinary document would make a journalist suspicious. Bill must be desperate to land another Obama interview.
28 posted on 02/17/2011 9:09:43 PM PST by peeps36 (America is being destroyed by filthy traitors in the political establishment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dalight

Special Agent to Obama supporters:
"I am looking for the Imposter’s REAL birth certificate."



29 posted on 02/17/2011 9:11:56 PM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

You could be right. I thought a President can not have ever held citizenship in another country. Maybe that is what they are hiding, Indonesian passport?


30 posted on 02/17/2011 9:13:52 PM PST by nolongerademocrat ("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Batman11

“Soetobakh”...for some reason when I say that name in my head I hear Jabba the Hutt’s voice saying it


31 posted on 02/17/2011 9:14:38 PM PST by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: antonico
What I wasn’t aware of that DuJan points out in his post on Hillbuzz is that at least 10 states, with more on the horizon, are underway to enacting a legislative requirement to provide a Certificate of Live Birth for name access to that’s state’s ballot. I had no idea it was 10 or more. I’d read the White House was extremely concerned about this. They planned on having only 1 or 2 states enact this requirement and then label them as racist states. But when 10 or more plan on it, then the “racist” brush won’t paint a swath that wide and resonate.

Ultimately, folks smell a rat, and even if this is nothing, the possibility exists that someone else would play this game so its worth dealing with. Frankly, the last few election cycles saw several candidates who were ineligible on the ballot in several states. The system has relied on the national parties guaranteeing the person's eligibility and this has come into question, so the only rational response is to do what states do for everyone else, say "Show me."

32 posted on 02/17/2011 9:16:35 PM PST by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dalight

“if you read the State Department’s own manual on citizenship they specifically separate the definition of Natural Born citizen from Naturalized and Birthright Citizenship.”

Really? Do you have a copy? Or is it online?

I know that there are three types of statutory citizenship: native born (born in the U.S. to legal residents); citizenship-by-statute (born overseas to one or two U.S. citizen parents); and naturalization (foreign-born but naturalized as citizen).

Natural Born Citizen only appears in the U.S.Constitution as an eligibility requirement for the Presidency. It is NOT now, nor has it ever been, a type of citizenship.


33 posted on 02/17/2011 9:19:32 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NeverForgetBataan

You are dead on. In order to be a natural born citizen, one has to be the child of two US citizens. The democrat party tried to disqualify John McCain because he was born in the Panama Canal zone trying to make the case that he was born outside of the US. His father was a US Navy officer and his mother was born in the US. But when it comes to obama, no such scrutiny was applied to him. IF he is actually Barak Hussein Obama, then he is not qualified because according to British law, his father was a British citizen making Barak jr. NOT eligible to be the president. Add to that his family members proudly claiming that he was born in kenya and ALL his life records are sealed leads to the suspicion that he is not legally qualified.
But the democrats have proven many times that laws are for the little people and they don’t have to follow the law.

Silly Americans, laws are for kids. We are democrats and we can do damn well what we please. And no one is going to stand up to us because if they do, we will unleash our base to riot and destroy your cities if you question the kenyan illegal president.

The dims went all in with this guy and are not about to back down in their defense of him. He was and is their ticket to tyranny. And don’t count on anyone in the media to pursue this.


34 posted on 02/17/2011 9:20:25 PM PST by Texas resident (Hunkered Down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dalight
On his Illinois Bar Application, old whatsisname denied ever having used a name other than Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.. That is patently and demonstrably false.

Old whatsisname is no longer a member of the Illinois Bar for reasons which are sealed. He also falsely denied drug use, and any traffic violations. Typically, a wayward attorney might be offered a chance to "voluntarily" withdraw from the bar, and have all records sealed, rather than involve the parties in a possibly acrimonious proceeding. Old whatsisname's Bar Files are sealed.

In re the sealed original birth certificate: That is exactly what is done in the case of adoption by a step parent. The question is, was the Soetoro etc. moniker ever LEGALLY CHANGED BACK?

IMHO, it is possible that DuJan is not quite on target in one regard. That is, it is entirely possible that Barry was born elsewhere and Grandma Dunham just "phoned it in," as was very often the case in Hawaii in that period. As a result, neither DuJan, nor I, nor any Freeper can be sure either way! Smells fishy. Might be chicken?

I have always had the sneaking suspicion that the COLB/BC deal, while important and certainly germane, was a monstrous sleight-of-hand; a misdirection; away from the real issue of Barack Senior's citizenship. It has certainly helped Team Obama confuse the issue by conflating "Native" Citizenship, which is barely possible for him, with "Natural Born Citizenship," which on the face of it is impossible for him. In that regard, Team Obama has surely gotten its legal dollar's worth!

Gee, I wonder if I could get a Judge to look at this in court. What do you think?

35 posted on 02/17/2011 9:26:28 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (With a friend like Obama, a country needs no enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacpam
When BHO was adopted, Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship.

When BHO was adopted, the US did not allow parents to renounce the citizenship of minor children.

What Indonesia allowed or did not allow has nothing to do with it.

36 posted on 02/17/2011 9:28:42 PM PST by Jim Noble (House GOP: If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave
1. Where was Barry born? Kenya, Indonesia, Hawaii, Mars?
2. Who was his birth father (and is it on the long form BC)?
3. How many passports has he had? What countries issued them and under what name?
4. Why does Barry have MULTIPLE Social Security numbers? Is he committing identity fraud?
5. Did Barry attend college on a Fullbright scholarship? Fullbrights are only awarded to foreign nationals. Did Barry commit fraud to get the scholarship?
6. How did Barry travel to Pakistan at a time when U.S. citizens were not allowed to go there? What country's passport did he use?

Very interesting questions and there are many more. But, the one that stands above all: Why has Barry spent over $2 million in lawyer's fees to lockup all his most basic of records from scrutiny? Where there's this much smoke, there's a heck of a fire.

37 posted on 02/17/2011 9:30:42 PM PST by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dalight

How many names does this guy have for cryin’ out loud.


38 posted on 02/17/2011 9:30:50 PM PST by headstamp 2 ("My Boss is a Jewish Carpenter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalight

“The reason Obama has spent so much time and money hiding his original birth certificate is because his adoption in the 1970s, and the bizarre, Klingon-sounding name “Soetobakh” are just so strange and difficult to explain to Americans.”

RIGHT! And Barack Hussein Obama sounds great to American ears. Bull!!


39 posted on 02/17/2011 9:31:21 PM PST by ZULU (No nation which ever attempted to tolerate Islam, escaped total Islamization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalight

I didn’t know that. Thanks for pointing that out. Do you have a reference or citation?


40 posted on 02/17/2011 9:31:43 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-415 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson