White House Science Advisor: Climate Change Skeptics Are ‘Heretics’

CNSNews ^ | February 17, 2011 | Chris Neefus

[jazusamo]

This Holdren is a real class act (not), people disagreeing with him or his view are heretics. He sounds a lot like his boss.

[jazusamo]

Ping!

[circlecity]

Climate change heretic? I would be proud to wear that mantle.

[dirtboy]

White House Science Advisor: Climate Change Skeptics Are ‘Heretics’

He'd burn us at the stake except that puts carbon in the atmosphere.

[steelyourfaith]

Are we back to the Church of the Warming Globe ploy again?

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[Cincinatus]

Actually, I think that the term "heretic" for those who chose not to believe in AGW is perfectly apposite:

Heresy is a controversial or novel change to a system of beliefs, especially a religion, that conflicts with established dogma.

[RatRipper]

Well color me damned!!!!

[WayneS]

Repeat after me:

“There is no god but global warming and Algore is its Profit”

“Algore-hu Akbar! Death to the infidels!”

[WOBBLY BOB]

[Joe Brower]

'Heretics', eh? Then by Holdren's own words it is now indeed plain that the whole 'Global Warming' thesis has mutated from science to religion.

[Chattering Class of 58]

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Use of the term "heretic" proves that belief in climat-change/global warming is a religious belief.

I presume a Lefty Inquisition is coming?

[DarthVader]

I say lets burn him at the stake so he can get used to what he will be experiencing for eternity.

[WOBBLY BOB]

[cranked]

Defund Holdren while we are in the business of defunding worthless shit, kkthx. =.=

[Noob1999]

Holdren, get ready to pack your bags.

All you CZARS are about to be defunded.

No more lobster for you!

[cranked]

BTW, Holdren’s use of “heretics” carries religious undertones......is HoldrenIdiot admitting that Climate Warming....errrr, Climate change, is a religion? /s =.=

[Paladin2]

Holdren is issuing Fatwas just like Zer0 does.

Bunch a religious zealots.

[Servant of the Cross]

Oh my. Holdren, don't you read? Your "settled science" is the heretical fake bunk. Here's the real climate scientist, MIT's Dr. Richard Lindzen, and his testimony before Congress.

Given the above, the notion that alarming warming is ‘settled science’ should be offensive to any sentient individual, though to be sure, the above is hardly emphasized by the IPCC.

[olezip]

“This is not the view of a few isolated scientists, this is the overwhelming view of scientists who study this matter around the world,” Holdren said, adding, “There are always skeptics, there are always heretics. That’s in the nature of science.

Well, John, the skeptics are in your camp. The overwhelming view of real scientists who study this matter is that climate change is caused by the Sun, and not by a tiny, tiny fraction of carbon dioxide.

The so called "scientists" who believe in AGW all have a vested interest in AGW, and are funded to prove AGW with junk science. AGW is an acronym for Anthropogenic Global Warming, that is, man caused global warming.