Posted on 02/19/2011 4:09:28 AM PST by kevkrom
I strongly disagree with you. She is stating the other side without alienating or being obnoxius. Surley you don't think Chris Christie has a foot in both camps because he compliments good teachers. Taking an Ed Shultz or Michael Savage approach is not going to get anybody to the table. We need the extreme, intolerant comments, but not from the leaders who are going to have the responsibility to solve the problem.
What, by calling those on the other side "brothers and sisters"?
Calling someone your “brother and sister” is a bit stronger than a “compliment,” wouldn’t you say?
Palin was a member of the IBEW union. the international brothers of electrical workers when she was a sportscaster. her husband is a member of the USW union.
More damage has been done to the conservative movement by a desire for a "seat at the table" than you can possibly imagine.
I am a former union member and I approve of this message.
That may be, but sometimes you need to talk the language. Most people know where she stands. There is nothing wrong with attempting to relate. In that article she was trying to reach the union, not her base. The base gets it for the most part.
Well, if you’re right, “the base” is really screwed up.
It reminds me of the Scottish lords in “Braveheart.” “The base” leaves their blood on the battlefield while the bigshots make sure they have a “seat at the table.”
Seat at the table? You don't get it. Walker (a governor who understands the immediacy and severity of the problem) doesn't want to give them a seat - hell, he doesn't even want them to have a table. He is, quite simply, trying to undo the collective bargaining process BECAUSE IT IS BANKRUPTING THE STATE. No public service unions, or at least, no collective bargaining for those unions.
To everyone but Palin (apparently), this isn't a negotiating. It's a dissolution. To quote Nick Nolte from "48 Hrs"...
"Now, get this! We ain't partners. We ain't brothers. And we ain't friends.
" THAT'S the message conservative leaders should be sending. Nothing more, nothing less - especially when not even a majority of DEMOCRATS believe there should be public service unions.
10:31 AM looks up to me
/yeah because Reagan didn’t play nice with his brothers in the union. You ever hear of reagan democrates? Most of them were union members......how do you think Reagan won such landslides by calling people toddlers?
I like the more generic message..."government unions" should be an oxymoron. You're either government (with us) or union (by definition bargaining 'against us' taxpayers). You can't be on both sides of the table! Until government union becomes ILLEGAL, this country will remain a bankruptcy waiting to happen. Just because Soros likes something doesn't mean it 's good! /s
That is a fair observation. But.....damage has not been done by the desire to get a seat at the table. The damage has been done by turning into a wimp when you get your seat.
A distinction without a difference, as we’re seeing in Washington once again. The debt is increasing by almost $5 billion per hour and the best they can do is to cut back less than goes out in the time it took for them to debate it.
Really, Reagan FIRED the air traffic controllers. Remember that?
We are talking about PUBLIC SERVICE UNIONS. What part of "64% of the voters don't believe in public unions don't you understand?
This is a WINNING policy position for Republicans. It's that simple.
New tagline.
Nice tagline. I suppose I should not get a tagline indicating it’s ok to say anything as long as you can get to the table.
And Reagan when running for office did not call union rank and file “toddlers”. He rightly placed the blame where it belonged. The union leadership. Just has Palin has done here in this op-ed.
He fired the air traffic controllers when they refused to go back to work putting the lives of citizens in harms way.
February 16, 2011
Man Who Shot TV Over Bristol Palin’s Dancing Preps A Mental Defect Defense
The Wisconsin man (20 miles west of Madison), who was so upset by Bristol Palin’s success on “Dancing with the Stars” that he blasted his TV set with a shotgun yesterday pleaded not guilty to criminal charges and indicated that he will mount a defense based on the claim that he has a mental disease or defect....
Read more at:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.