Skip to comments.New report exonerates climate researchers
Posted on 02/24/2011 11:35:54 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A Commerce Department investigation has found no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of federal climate researchers whose e-mails were leaked in the debate over global climate change.
The report Thursday from the department's inspector general is the latest to exonerate climate scientists whose communications with the Climate Research Unit at England's University of East Anglia were stolen and made public in 2009.
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...
“We checked ourselves out, and we’re okay.”
I call bovine excrement.
Congratulations Mr. Wolf ..you’re hired .. you duty will be to protect that CHICKEN COOP over there.
I want proof, I want their data, all of it.
And social security and medicare are solvent,too !
“I want proof”
Sorry, um, national security.
>>This is getting really scary...we are so screwed<<
Well, I, for one, think it’s funny. They remind me of Dan Rather trying to say the forged documents may be authentic after they were outed totally and utterly completely. He is the first bona-fide, easy to prove, casualty of the internet. These guys apparently want to follow in his footsteps.
Unfortunately for them, we do not ALL live in the projects of south Chicagoland. Imbeciles. It will cost them.
A government study being reported by the AP-no credibility problem here! /sarc
This report was produced after extensive research performed by the fox guarding the hen house.
Do I look gullible and stupid, stupid, or just gullible?
Your tax dollars at work.
“Hide the decline” is not wrongdoing?
In science it is the ultimate sin!
In politics it is business as usual.
I guess they were, as most climate ‘science’ is, looking at it through the prism of politics not science.
You can't have it, they destroyed it. Yup, they DESTROYED the raw data. If the data doesn't agree with the pre-determined 'theory'; why, doesn't "science" dictate that you destroy that data? So, the remaining data is a mixture of actual data, and data that has been manipulated. This data is contaminated - it's less than worthless.
Of course they found nothing wrong. This is tantamount of the Teflon Don conducting an internal investigation of criminal activities within his “organization”—and surprise—not finding any.
Give me a break!
Let me see if I’ve got this ... A rigged “investigation” of a falsified “study” shows that the study wasn’t fake after all despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary?
In other news, Bonnie Parker Acts As Character Witness for Clyde Barrow, Says Accused Robber/Murderer “Just a Big Lug With a Heart of Gold”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.