Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate gives preliminary approval to photo ID bill (Wisconsin)
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel ^ | 2/24/2011 | Steve Schultze

Posted on 02/24/2011 12:12:36 PM PST by UB355

The 19 Republican members of the Senate Thursday gave preliminary approval to a state law requiring a photo ID to vote.

All 14 Democratic senators were absent, continuing their weeklong exodus to Illinois to avoid taking a vote on Gov. Scott Walker's public worker union rights curtailment.

The measure, which is strongly opposed by many Democrats, was hailed by Republicans as a commonsense method of ensuring fair elections. Democrats have argued that incidents of voter fraud are very rare and the ID requirement would curb voting by minorities and others.

"Not a single voter in this state will be disenfranchised by the ID law," said Sen. Mary Lazich (R-New Berlin). Republicans adopted revisions to the original version so that several forms of ID would be acceptable, including driver's licenses, state ID cards, passports and tribal IDs.

Student IDs would not be allowed under the version given preliminary approval. Lazich said Republicans wanted to set standards for student IDs before agreeing to allow them.

The new version also provides a grace period until next January before the requirement is enforced. Voters at spring elections without photo IDs will be given brochures explaining the new requirement but would be allowed to vote.

Senators could not vote final approval on the bill because it has a cost and fiscal bills require at least 20 senators to be present.

Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald implored Democratic senators to return to the Capitol so the voter ID and other measures can be completed. If the final vote isn't taken in the next couple of weeks, it will cost the state more because a separate educational outreach beyond the spring elections explaining the law would be needed, Lazich said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: acorn; electionfraud; fraud; id; votefraud; voter; voterfraud; voterid; voting

1 posted on 02/24/2011 12:12:39 PM PST by UB355
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UB355

Step by step... inch by inch...


2 posted on 02/24/2011 12:14:32 PM PST by Interesting Times (WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

This is great.


3 posted on 02/24/2011 12:19:02 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UB355

DOJ will step in next to “declare” it unconstitutional.


4 posted on 02/24/2011 12:27:18 PM PST by Bobby_Taxpayer (Don't tread on us...or you'll pay the price in the next election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355

how about voting by mail? Is there any extra security measure there? Physically going to a vote booth and voting somewhat reduces the fraud because theres only so many times a person can physically vote a day. Voting by mail makes fraud alot easier


5 posted on 02/24/2011 12:28:51 PM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355

Senators could not vote final approval on the bill because it has a cost and fiscal bills require at least 20 senators to be present.

What are the fiscal requirements? Do you need an ID to vote ... Yes ... done. Everything beyond that can be deferred until the truancy officer collects the children.


6 posted on 02/24/2011 12:34:11 PM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355

OK, how about a bill making this the law next:

(1) Participation in a government employee union in any capacity other than as a rank-and-file member is participation in a criminal organization punishable by fine of all payments received from that union and 1 to 5 years in prison.

(2) Receipt of campaign contributions from a government employee union is public corruption punishable by fine of up to three times the contributions and 1 to 5 years in prison.

(3) Participating in or assisting a government employee union giving campaign contributions to any candidate or political party or group is public corruption punishable by 1 to 5 years in prison.

Sure we can come up with more. Question is, can the Republican Senators in WI do so, and do they have the guts to go there?


7 posted on 02/24/2011 12:36:51 PM PST by piytar (Obastard is a use of the term "bastard" in the literal sense -- Obama is hiding his daddy's identity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355

“The 19 Republican members”???

Uh... the word you’re working for is “majority”, guys.

The MAJORITY of the Senate voted for the bill.


8 posted on 02/24/2011 12:38:56 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355
I was at the post office the other day when I noticed a sign:

"PHOTO ID REQUIRED WHEN SIGNING FOR PACKAGES OR MAIL"

At the bottom appeared to be a reference to the Federal law (it was way too small to read). This struck me a bit odd, you can't get your mail w/o an ID, but an ID for voting is discriminatory against the poor?

9 posted on 02/24/2011 12:40:08 PM PST by Michael.SF. (Going to Charlotte for the barbecue is like going to Minneapolis for the gumbo - John Reed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

how about just stating, no state agency or official, either directly or indirectly, shall collect or distribute or cause to be distributed any union dues.


10 posted on 02/24/2011 12:41:18 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bobby_Taxpayer

Interestingly enough, Wisconsin and Indiana are in the same federal judicial circuit. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has already upheld the Constitutionality of the Indiana law, so the forces of evil may be screwed.


11 posted on 02/24/2011 12:48:50 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Mail in ballots are elementally intolerable.


12 posted on 02/24/2011 12:51:20 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UB355

I believe Egregious organized voter fraud should be a capital offense. It is basically political assassination because it undermines the very confidence in the system that allows people to act in a civilized manner to pick their leaders.Once that presupposition is gone then the entire system breaks down.


13 posted on 02/24/2011 12:58:31 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355
Dems argue that there is no voter fraud, but the rules (when they exist at all) make it virtually impossible to discover fraud. Same day registration, friend/acquaintance/union thug affirming you are who you say you are, etc. lend
themselves to fraudulent voting.

Voter id, absentee ballots must be notarized, cleaning up the voter rolls, etc. are common sense requirements to insure a fair vote. The reason the Dems don't want a fair vote, is they know they will lose every time.

14 posted on 02/24/2011 2:17:28 PM PST by bballbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson