Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Net Neutrality is Anything But Neutral ( Teapartypatriots.org )
Tea Party Patriots.org ^

Posted on 02/26/2011 8:28:43 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing

Net neutrality is an innocuous sounding term for what is really media Marxism. This is an ideological attempt by those on the left to control the greatest means for the distribution of information ever devised. It provides a playing field which the government does not control, and this is immensely troubling to those on the left.

There are two pieces to net neutrality:

Equal Access: Equal access says that everyone should always have equal priorities to the flow of information on the internet. In practice, this means that if I am updating my Twitter account, and my neighbor is downloading a movie, he shouldn't have access to more bandwidth than me. Right now, the large providers manage access, with some handling over one million URL requests a second. They are doing a phenomenal job. Net neutrality would prevent them from doing so, and would essentially "socialize" the internet.

This would also create some horrendous situations with the providers being unable to provide more bandwidth and priority to a hospital downloading an emergency transmission of an MRI, than they provide to me while I update my Twitter feed. We are obviously against this.

Equal Rates / Equal Service: Proponents of net neutrality are also trying to stop providers from offering "tiered" service plans. Think "first class," "business pricing plans for phone service etc." According to proponents, under net neutrality, everyone has to be charged the same, and provided the same services. This is the antithesis of capitalism, and would result in the stifling of technology development. Providers spend billions developing the technology; it is their right to charge as they see fit, and to create pricing plans that serve the needs of real customers in a real marketplace.

Our position is that net neutrality is simply government interference in the most important communications medium in history. Tea Party Patriots across the nation are very concerned about government regulation and interference in the internet, and we will be continuing to educate them about the reality of net neutrality, and the damage it will do to both the progress of technology and to the operation of the free market.


TOPICS: Unclassified
KEYWORDS: freespeech; marxism; netneutrality; powergrab
Don't know how many of you ever go to the TPP' homepage, but this is their stance on it.

Seems to me like they heard what cass sunstein said.

And they took him seriously.

1 posted on 02/26/2011 8:28:51 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

I haven’t paid much attention to the net neutrality thing. Thank God they’re on the job.


2 posted on 02/26/2011 8:40:09 PM PST by youngidiot (Don't let the name fool ya, toots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

They never let up on ways to silence anyone who isn’t on there side and anyone that don’t promote their lies.

They want total control like China.


3 posted on 02/26/2011 8:42:22 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (They don't need to do another 911. They have BHO and the Fleebaggers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

The Left, the Liberals are truly void in the comprehension department. They flat out don’t get it.

It’s a mental disorder.


4 posted on 02/26/2011 8:58:19 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Oh for goodness sakes this the shot youself in the foot idiotic bandwagon of the century.


5 posted on 02/26/2011 9:08:30 PM PST by Tempest (I put money ahead of people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Btt


6 posted on 02/27/2011 12:17:56 AM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Uhh... net neutrality refers to regulations that keep ISPs from charging tiered rates -to content providers-, not end-users. So obviously they can differentially charge business plans and single-family access plans.

Net neutrality keeps ISPs from charging different rates for YouTube traffic than Netflix traffic, say, or working out a deal where “basic ISP” users can view the huffington post but only “elite ISP” users can view freerepublic. This is the kind of easy to enforce, pro-market, transparent to the regulated kind of regulations that we need, and that keep us from the crony capitalism of the Japanese, Indonesia or Russia.


7 posted on 02/27/2011 12:36:03 AM PST by socalgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I saw this coming years ago, when I saw an interview with Hillary. She was asked by a reporter if the government should control the internet. She said not necessarily, but that there probably needed to be some form of.......GATEKEEPER! I'll never forget that word; uttered so casually, with such ominous implications. I'm sure there must be video floating around which bears this out. It was the first time that I realized how truly cunning she is.
8 posted on 02/27/2011 1:44:43 AM PST by weeder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socalgop

No it doesn’t. That’s only the sales pitch.

Net neutrality is the fairness doctrine for the internet. We have them on tape, we know their plans.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2pIU5H0PaU

He has not changed his views.


9 posted on 02/27/2011 4:55:09 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing ( Net Neutrality - I say a lot of unneutral things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: weeder

Right.

But if they’re going to control the internet, you think they’ll just come out and say that en mass?

Or would they come up with some bogus scheme and fearmonger about corporations? Maybe even come up with a nice sounding name like “net neutrality”?

Who’s against neutrality and fairness?


10 posted on 02/27/2011 4:56:29 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing ( Net Neutrality - I say a lot of unneutral things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: socalgop
I see NOTHING wrong with how the internet operates now and it is competitiveness and capitalism at its best. Any time you get the government sticking its claws into anything, no matter how minor, its over for that industry because their government control will just increase by leaps and bounds.

Wake up! "we need" no government interference in the internet. Maybe "you" do for some unknown reason but "we" don't. ............... :O)

11 posted on 02/27/2011 6:08:15 AM PST by Old Badger (I still like Palin because she will tell like it is and she take no prisoners!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson