Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Four Golden Rules of Firearms Safety
AC ^ | Feb 11, 2010 | Dan S. Defense

Posted on 03/02/2011 9:21:03 AM PST by ArrogantBustard

Guns are dangerous tools. They can save lives and they can destroy them. When you take on the responsibility to handle a firearm, you must take it seriously and you must educate yourself, on all that it takes to be a safe and responsible gun owner. You may be surprised to learn that there are only four basic golden rules to gun safety. If you follow these rules—at all times—you will be safe and so will the people around you. Please realize that any gun owner who's foolish enough to disobey these golden rules, by negligence or stupidity, makes us all look bad. If you know someone who's new to firearm ownership, or if you know an "expert" who thinks he or she no longer needs to follow these rules, please send them this link. I hate to sound melodramatic, but it will probably save lives.

The four golden rules were given to us by the late Col. Jeff Cooper. To many, as to me, Mr. Cooper is the father of the modern pistol craft. If you take the time to read his books (e.g. To Ride, Shoot Straight and Speak the Truth) , you'll find that he is much more than that but, in this context, we'll look at the knowledge he condensed and packaged for us.

The four golden rules to firearm safety:

1. All guns are always loaded.

2. Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.

3. Keep your finger off the trigger till your sights are on the target.

4. Identify your target, and what is behind it. Never shoot at shadows and/or noises.

(Excerpt) Read more at associatedcontent.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; gunsafety
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161 next last
To: UriÂ’el-2012
I was using guns before your father was born; boy!

I have been using and handling firearms for over sixty-five years.

You fall short on your first claim to me. Do you want to take a stab at supporting your NRA claims?

121 posted on 03/03/2011 7:53:48 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Did you pick up any useful communicating skills along the way besides insults?

When you are dealing with the uneducable,
one needs to communicate that fact

122 posted on 03/03/2011 8:04:14 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Do you want to take a stab at supporting your NRA claims?

Are so lazy that you can not
look it up yourself, if you disbelieve it.

You seem to be uneducable.

I seem to waste my time with the willingly ignorant.


123 posted on 03/03/2011 8:08:39 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012
I get it. You're a blowhard that likes to make stuff up.

That doesn't mean your careless with firearms. But it means we shouldn't put too much belief in what you say.

Why don't you support this claim?

Many years ago the NRA used the Cooper rules;
His rules proved to be unsafe as NDs did not decrease,
the NRA training dept spent years developing safer rules.

You have several people interested, why won't you discuss it?

124 posted on 03/03/2011 8:09:42 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012

Do you believe it is the responsibility of everyone on Free Republic to disprove false claims made by people who won’t respond when challenged.

We have searched, it doesn’t exist.


125 posted on 03/03/2011 8:11:26 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: thackney
I get it. You're a blowhard that likes to make stuff up. That doesn't mean your careless with firearms. But it means we shouldn't put too much belief in what you say. Why don't you support this claim? Many years ago the NRA used the Cooper rules; His rules proved to be unsafe as NDs did not decrease, the NRA training dept spent years developing safer rules. You have several people interested, why won't you discuss it?

Call the NRA and ask some who was there
when the new rules were promulgated.

126 posted on 03/03/2011 8:16:03 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012

some ==> someone


127 posted on 03/03/2011 8:17:15 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
And mine are loaded all the time except during storage, cleaning, or when being reloaded.

That's exactly NRA #3.

ADs happen when people violate Rule #1.

ND/AD occurs when the operator violates NRA 2. Damage/injury results if the operator violates BOTH NRA 1 and 2. Merely assuming a gun is loaded means precisely nothing unless you act accordingly per NRA 1 and 2.

If you adhere to the NRA rules, the condition of the gun is irrelevant. If you adhere to Gunsite 1, you can neither clean nor work on your gun.

The Gunsite rules are well intentioned, but the NRA rules require less equivocation.

128 posted on 03/03/2011 8:22:43 AM PST by xsrdx (Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012

What year do you claim the NRA switched from Cooper’s 4 to the current 3?


129 posted on 03/03/2011 8:35:52 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3
whereas the nra version simply deems a violation to be an 'oopsie'...

How did you arrive at that conclusion? How does one ND without violating NRA 2? How does one do harm without violating both NRA 1 and 2?

There is NOTHING in the NRA rules that directs assuming a firearm is unloaded.

NRA 3 simply directs the operator to unload guns that don't need to be loaded, while NRA 1 and 2 ensure that, regardless of condition loaded/unloaded, the gun is handled in a safe manner.

Gunsite 1 adds nothing that the NRA rules don't address more effectively.

130 posted on 03/03/2011 8:44:45 AM PST by xsrdx (Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: thackney
What year do you claim the NRA switched from Cooper’s 4 to the current 3?

I have been teaching the three NRA rules for fifteen years.

I believe the switch occurred about twenty years ago.


131 posted on 03/03/2011 8:51:24 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: xsrdx; ArrogantBustard
you are simply arguing semantics...i'm simply stating that my interpretation of those 'words' will, for someone such as myself, and my adolescent son, allude to a 'less than' respect for the personal responsibility to treat ALL GUNS as LOADED...nra #3 doesnt provide for the ASSumption that all guns are hot [and to check em yerself] but rather for the determination that, since its not 'in use', it *should* be deemed, considered or whatever, UN-loaded...

to marginally trained, easily distracted people, THAT is a dangerous word game to play...

and so far, neither yourself, nor the blowhard hijacking this thread has demonstrated how one is in more danger by simply ASSuming and treating ALL guns as being loaded, and properly handling them as if they were, including muzzle control, target and backstop ID, and trigger discipline...

now i will await another empty answer of 'nra says so' to continue wasting bandwidth...

132 posted on 03/03/2011 9:12:55 AM PST by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3

lol....


133 posted on 03/03/2011 9:19:44 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ ( "Hokahey, today is a good day to die!" Crazy Horse, Lakota Sioux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: thackney

lol...got a live one on the wire today!!!!


134 posted on 03/03/2011 9:24:04 AM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012; Eagle Eye
2012 You are wrong. Remington 700’s had AD’s for years. The only negligent party was Remington not the person handling the gun.
135 posted on 03/03/2011 9:26:11 AM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
You are wrong. Remington 700’s had AD’s for years. The only negligent party was Remington not the person handling the gun.

Perhaps I'm wrong, but I was led to believe
that is the left-wing media trashing the gun industry.

OBTW it would have been an ND not an AD.


136 posted on 03/03/2011 9:32:19 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3
"Proper handling" is NRA 1 and 2, regardless of condition.

Still not sure how you get "since its not 'in use', it *should* be deemed, considered or whatever, UN-loaded... from 3 - the only intent there is to ensure guns that aren't in use as *defined by the operator*, are unloaded. It doesn't relieve you from the obligation to observe 1 and 2.

The practical implementation of Gunsite 1 is observing NRA 1 and 2; "All guns are loaded/Every gun is a loaded gun" is obviously fiction and a distraction from the importance of proper handling.

"Treat every gun as a loaded gun" is fine, but adds nothing that NRA 1 and 2 don't already effectively address with less confusion.

137 posted on 03/03/2011 10:09:09 AM PST by xsrdx (Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
CT Senate Bill 1094: "felonize" posession of 10+ round magazines

138 posted on 03/03/2011 10:37:55 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012
Thank you ... here we go again.

I notice from the link that the execrable Carolyn McCarthy has introduced a standard-capacity magazine ban in the US House.

139 posted on 03/03/2011 10:49:55 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Thank you ... here we go again.

I got your back when we are attacked.

140 posted on 03/03/2011 10:59:14 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson