[Conan the Conservative]

“What is interesting is that this is easily the explanation for WHY he has not prosecuted the Black Panthers for voter intimidation. He is a racist, for NOT enforcing the laws of this nation.”

I have little doubt he is reluctant to prosecute the panthers due to race.

[Girlene]

I have little doubt he is reluctant to prosecute the panthers due to race.

Seriously? lol. Eric Holder:

..........""Think about that," Holder said. "When you compare what people endured in the South in the 60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, and to compare what people were subjected to there to what happened in Philadelphia—which was inappropriate, certainly that…to describe it in those terms I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line, who risked all, for my people," said Holder"...........

[BuckeyeTexan]

Oh but the NBP Party and three specific individuals were prosecuted (by the Bush Admin) and conviction was certain because the defendants failed to answer the complaint or even appear in court to answer the suit ...

... until Holder stepped in and dropped the complaint (and therefore the impending conviction) against the NBP and two of the individuals. Holder isn't reluctant to prosecute the remaining indvidual. He sought and obtained an injuction against him (Shabaz) preventing him from displaying a weapon at any Philadelphia polling place for three years ...

... but those actions are already illegal under the law. So why bother? Holder has not only refused to uphold the law but also dismissed convictions under the law for his people.

Holder isn't a thug by omission; Holder is a thug by commission.