. . . . # 7 , and # 8.
.
The ONLY way to get rid of a sitting President is through Congress. It is in the Constitution, folks.
All these lawyers — they’re wasting their time and talent on the Supreme Court, and it’s all for nothing because they, the Supreme Court justices, just don’t have the constitutional authority to do anything in this instance.
Quo warranto: the U.S. congress (for obvious political reasons) has given authority, for trying a usurper, to the Washington, D.C., District Courts. Via quo warranto, obama must prove he is eligible, as a natural born citizen, to be President.
. . . . # 7 , and # 8.
.
>The ONLY way to get rid of a sitting President is through Congress. It is in the Constitution, folks.
So then you claim that any requirement the Constitution puts upon someone actually being President is irrelevant and/or illegitimate?
>All these lawyers — they’re wasting their time and talent on the Supreme Court, and it’s all for nothing because they, the Supreme Court justices, just don’t have the constitutional authority to do anything in this instance.
What of the above?