Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There Aren’t Enough Millionaires - The rich can’t fund our deficits.
NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE ^ | March 14, 2011 | Kevin D. Williamson

Posted on 03/16/2011 8:16:24 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
That means either cut spending or tax the middle class more. The poor don't pay income taxes.
1 posted on 03/16/2011 8:16:28 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

What about the Billionaires like Oprah?

Oh wait, she doesn’t build schools here...


2 posted on 03/16/2011 8:19:57 PM PDT by Freddd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Michael Moore said there are trillions of dollars out there, which are in the wrong hands, he says.

Michael Moore declared that all of this money should be part of our natural resources, to be used to build the economy, etc. etc.

Would Michael Moore lie or distort the truth??????


3 posted on 03/16/2011 8:21:02 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

That is what marxism is......destroy the vast middle class of a society——its where enough money and networth meet with enough numbers of population to obtain real wealth.

didnt K.Marx desire to destroy the middle class with vast waves of inflation, interest and taxation.......

deja vu all over again.


4 posted on 03/16/2011 8:25:42 PM PDT by sbark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

everyone should pay taxes. when I made minimum wage I paid my fair share, everyone needs to help out. The govt needs to cut spending toooooooo! The poor are a sad excuse for not paying taxes..


5 posted on 03/16/2011 8:26:06 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Would Michael Moore lie or distort the truth??????

Could Michael Moore cause a tsunami?

6 posted on 03/16/2011 8:27:43 PM PDT by mlocher (Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
That's the problem with the leftist ideology - they do consider goods and services as natural resources, which happen to be routinely “stolen” by the rich, but should be distributed “justly”. They also think that taxpayer base naturally exist - you increase rate, you increase revenue.

In real world goods and service have to be produced and, if there not enough economic activity, there will be nothing to distribute “justly” or otherwise! Also, if you increase tax rate, you just might shrink the taxpayer base and get less tax revenue!

7 posted on 03/16/2011 8:30:48 PM PDT by alecqss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; rabscuttle385; mkjessup; ...

Silly, the whole thing is a scam. The Democrats use ‘taxing the rich’ as a scam for getting us to accept regressive taxes on ourselves, which is the real revenue. Liberal Maryland is a great example raising the sales tax with two taxes ‘on the rich’. Clinton raised the gas tax and taxes on SS benefits. Obama wanted cap and trade.

If Obama really believed taxes on the rich fixed anything he would have pushed them when he had complete control of congress. It’s all a scam, you know the ‘fairness’ scam to make you think you got a good deal???


8 posted on 03/16/2011 8:34:07 PM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I don’t think there is enough dough in the world to fund our deficits.


9 posted on 03/16/2011 8:37:20 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

The middle class and user fees is where the real money is, income taxes is a leverage. A dollar per month per phone is how much money, a nickel on each email is how much money, etc,etc.


10 posted on 03/16/2011 8:40:53 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

No, it means they have to cut spending, period. Government is not a perpetual motion machine that can go on and on putting out more than there is to put in. It simply collapses under its own spiral of debt and spending.

Government deficit spending has become the heroin of politicians of all stripes. The addiction is strong. Every injection causes more addiction and more damage to the body. But the pain of stopping is far worse. So the injections continue until death.

And then the addiction is done.

Does any politician have the courage to lead the way off our current death spiral before death? Or even more importantly, is the electorate have the courage to elect a politician that is willing to stop the injections and suffer the pain of stopping the addiction?


11 posted on 03/16/2011 8:44:01 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Our deficits are high treason.


12 posted on 03/16/2011 8:45:12 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Public employee unions are the barbarian hordes of our time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The best response to the problem of the poor and poverty-stricken - make access to the system of income distribution known as “capitalism” available to one and all.

And to do that, make a bigger pie. The wealth of the planet is there for conversion to useful things for the population, and in doing so, fund the continued growth and expansion of that magic source that feeds so many, and moves people up the hierarchy of needs, beyond the most basic of food, shelter and human contact, to the more creative levels and refinement of thinking.

What we have as common and everyday things in terms of being far beyond the fulfillment of the more basic needs, would be envied by kings of old. But it was precisely the sense of entitlement that those kings of old exulted in, that prevented the sharing of growth and improvements in the standards of the day for ALL people, that kept the kings themselves in a relative state of impoverishment.

We have in this world a new set of the elite, who think nothing of dissing their fellow man once they have achieved a level of superiority in terms of wealth and influence, that they should always maintain the elevated position, and block anyone else from sharing, no matter how much talent the less favored may exhibit. These are as despicable as the despots and tyrants of the past, the more so because the lessons of history have been somehow escaped them, and they are terrified of the consequences of the application of these lessons.

Somewhere between a totally self-absorbed hedonism, and the most saintly (but ultimately self-defeating) altruism, there is something that may be called enlightened self-interest, in that by allowing fellow human beings to do well, the benefactor himself also does well - even better than he had been.


13 posted on 03/16/2011 8:50:40 PM PDT by alloysteel ("If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The rich: Anyone who is not a member of a labor union.


14 posted on 03/16/2011 8:53:15 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

But Michael Moore says the 400 richest Americans own half of everything. Lefties are repeating it over and over, claiming it’s been proven. What if we just killed them all and took their money and things? Then we’d fix everything.


15 posted on 03/16/2011 9:00:40 PM PDT by Minn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Here is an idea I thought of over the weekend. If the Libs/Progressives/Socialist want the top tax bracket back to what it was in the 1950-1960, then we roll back government to those levels also. Any agency that has been founded and all welfare programs will need to be rolled back.

I would love to hear them scream about that.


16 posted on 03/16/2011 9:07:19 PM PDT by SledgeCS (If this is an example of a transparent government, I would hate to see what a secret one is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
The Democrats use ‘taxing the rich’ as a scam for getting us to accept regressive taxes on ourselves, which is the real revenue.

Then there are groups like NPR that tax the middle class to support wealthy liberal elite entertainment...

What we know for sure is they have their hands in our pockets...

17 posted on 03/16/2011 9:07:32 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php - It's only uncivil when someone on the right does it.- Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

[[the problem isn’t that they’re not rich enough,]]

The problem IS that the whining left are consumed with jealousy- they see people richer than themselves, and imediately boil with envy- Most Americans are sick and tired of the left’s whining on this issue- Jealousy is an ugly ugly trait- the rich ALREADY pay nearly 75% in taxes- LEAVE THEM ALONE! STOP WHINING! AND MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS LEFT!!! IF YOU HAVEN’T GOT ENOUGH $$ STROP PISSING AND MOANING AND GO EARN IT FOR CRYING OUT LOUD- AND STOP TRYIGN TO TAKE IT AWAY FROM EVERYONE ELSE!!!!!!!!!!


18 posted on 03/16/2011 9:46:40 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

And YES I’m yelling! Sick and tired of the jealousy of the left and their constant whining about rich folks


19 posted on 03/16/2011 9:47:35 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

right nowe as we speak, congressman anthony wiener is on screaming about the rich and looking to take away even more from them- I wish he and his ILK qwould just shut the hell up- He’s dominated the conversation- cutting off backman and shawn- Cant stand listenign to mindless screamers liek that


20 posted on 03/16/2011 9:51:09 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson