Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Theophilus
By increasing the cost of goods 20-25%. That is called insanity.

It doesn't increase costs at all on used items or items purchased by businesses. You also fail to understand embedded corporate incomes taxes, along with compliance costs passed onto the consumer, already amounts to nearly 23% of the price. The Fair Tax will remove those embedded taxes from the price and show that 23% separately on the receipt.

Moreover, price increases will vary by industry but any price increase will be approximately no more than 8% on domestic goods since employers will most likely not pass onto the consumer the savings of no longer paying the employer matching tax but will pass on savings of other federal taxes no longer collected by the employer. Prices will increase by the range you cite for foreign goods since they will currently don't have a consumption tax imposed on imported goods to the U.S. but will have it imposed under The Fair Tax. That will benefit U.S. firms who are at, on average, a 17% disadvantage with their foreign competition. Competition will reduce any price increase to some extent overtime.

Any price increase on domestic goods will be more than offset by the fact no longer will taxes be imposed on wages, capital gains, estates, interest on savings and used items.

It's insanity to oppose a system that will shift power away from the federal government and back to the people by allowing them to decide when and how often they are taxed based on when they make purchases.
77 posted on 03/18/2011 4:27:05 AM PDT by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Defend Liberty
You also fail to understand embedded corporate incomes taxes, along with compliance costs passed onto the consumer, already amounts to nearly 23% of the price.

You fail to understand the existence of imports, and while you pat yourself on the back because you recognize some compliance costs, US industry is still hampered by massive regulatory compliance costs outside of the IRS. I also call BS on the 23% gross income corporate tax rate. If you have to tell a very large lie to sell your argument, you are likely selling something that no one wants.

The Fair Tax will remove those embedded taxes from the price and show that 23% separately on the receipt.

And that is where the "Fair Taxers" leave reality world and enter in to the same place static analysis Demoncats go when they think that they can raise taxes without consequences. Reasonable people see the 23% tax on everything and consider, theft, barter, fraud and the already burgeoning underground economy (you know, the one that can already buy and sell billions of $ in drugs, guns, services and other contraband without any tax oversight).

The Fair Tax is a foreigner's dream tax, and a citizen's nightmare tax. Only someone who is ignorant of this or hates America would advocate it. Let me briefly explain.

Shekar gets his H1-B visa and spends a couple decades in the US earning money tax free working in the tech sector. Spending as little as possible, he socks away his income with the intention of retiring to his native India. No taxes paid in the US, low sales tax in India. Win/Win.

José sneaks across the southern border and no longer needs to steal ID because who cares? He earns money no longer taxed with the eye towards retiring home in Mexico where the sales tax is low. Win/Win.

Sally has already worked most of her life in the US and has nearly 40% of her income taxed from her in the form of income taxes, and another "23%" in "embedded taxes" whenever she purchases something. Not some Jackass want to tax whatever wealth she has accumulated and already paid taxes on for her retirement at an initial 25%. Lose/Lose

Bill has worked 80hr weeks all his life, saved like a miser and now is worth tens of millions. All along he has had to drag along the burden of the current tax system. Now some jackal wants to steal his already taxed investment nestegg an additional 25% (initially). Bill won't take this lying down, he picks up and moves to Costa Rica, New Zealand, or any other swelling ex-pat community anywhere else on the planet other than the united States and takes his investment money with him. Lose/Wash

Basically, the Fair Taxers want to scare away all this nation's wealth, or at least the large sums controlled by people who know how to make and retain money and are mobile. Suckers who are left will see their already heavily taxed retirement vanish with yet another confiscatory tax brought on by lunatic Libertarians.

Corporations leave the united States for a myriad of reasons outside just the tax burden, since you correctly observed that they can pass on the additional tax. The US consumer market would shrink because everything now costs significantly more, so corporations would still be outside the US since that is where the growing market is. There would be an uptick in sales by those who have expatriated to tax havens rather than be raped here in the US. The vacation/travel industry would flat out die as a convention in Vancouver or San Saba is far more appealing with the new 25% penalty attached. The millions of government retirees would take all of that tax money collected and spend it outside the US. Why retire in American anymore, particularly with Obamacare promising the same if not worse health care then elsewhere. Speaking of healthcare, big ticket hospital visits are much cheaper in India, Mexico and Singapore - yet another reason, under the "Fair Tax" to enjoy one's wealth anywhere but the united States.

So tell me, how do you expect the US to survive if its only source of taxing flees the country? 80% tax on those who remain? 100%? Any limit?

78 posted on 03/18/2011 5:24:22 AM PDT by The Theophilus (Pray for Obama (Psalms 109:8))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Defend Liberty
This statement merited its only reply.
It's insanity to oppose a system that will shift power away from the federal government and back to the people by allowing them to decide when and how often they are taxed based on when they make purchases

This is a fundamental misunderstanding of the relationship of the FedGov to the "people". Your complaint isn't really about the FedGov capriciously making up tax laws, that is absurd. Your complaint is that organized special interests, in effect, decide the tax code. The reason why we have a mortgage interest deduction is not because the Tax and Spenders had a rare moment of benevolence towards the serfs, its because the home real-estate industry worked the system to get it. Over a few generations of competing interests we have this convoluted mess of a tax code that is universally hated.

If anything, your Fair Tax could never be a reality because of the WTO and world courts. Lets say you had your wet dream of punishing the retirees and wealthy with double taxation and lets say every lie about how domestic industry would benefit were to be true. The countries with industry that competes with those in the united States would immediately file objection after objection with the WTO regarding an unfair market. Their argument, among many valid complaints is that the zero tax on industry is the equivalent of government subsidies of an industry, and the courts have always ruled against the united States in matters where this comes up. So you need to up your complaint to the WTO and UN since that is likely going to be the major obstacle.

You dream about not having a government inspect your income - we all would love that dream; but it is foolish to think that government tax regulators would be a thing of the past. Ask anyone who has to live under the burden of a VAT. Think about the sandwich shop or the diamond broker. In the former, each and every sandwich will have to be accounted for, audited and taxed. Unannounced and frequent inspections of books would be the rule. In the latter, how do you prove a diamond is "new" as opposed to "used", or a consignment? And who in hell would buy a diamond in this country with a 25% premium attached when one can pick up jewelry on the cheap during a cruise?

You are trading in one imposing government inspector for another. Furthermore, how does this work out for the majority of states that depend on an income tax at the state and often local level? Not only will the oppression continue on the sole proprietor for every nut and bolt sold at his hardware store from the sales tax inspector, but do we keep the same income tax auditor to make sure that he didn't deduct too much from his income statement?

Does the "Fair Tax" mandate an abolition of all income taxes in all states? What about the non-income income tax in Texas called the "franchise tax"? Is there a 10th Amendment anymore, or do these states have to tack on their 10-20% to make up for the lost income tax?

So it isn't really just the FedGod. Its will still be the FedGov, it will be the customs inspector who will demand an accounting of absolutely everything you take in and out of the country. Your bags will be relentlessly torn apart and searched for any valuable purchased elsewhere, any and all cargo containers will have to be heavily audited to make sure you didn't import a gray market car, or ship to yourself a plasma TV purchased outside the country. Organized crime will flourish in ways that would humble the days of Prohibition and government will of course accuse you, the peasant, of being a participant in the underground market where you will have to prove that absolutely everything in your home, at any given surprise inspection, was legally purchased and appropriately taxed.

Then repeat this at the State and local level.

You are trading in the evil IRS for a total Police State that can march in at any time and inventory/audit your home, your business and your vaults.

Who again is the insane one?

79 posted on 03/18/2011 6:15:10 AM PDT by The Theophilus (Pray for Obama (Psalms 109:8))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Defend Liberty
You also fail to understand embedded corporate incomes taxes, along with compliance costs passed onto the consumer, already amounts to nearly 23% of the price.

I've seen this claim multiple times but never any backup. Do you have any?

The Fair Tax will remove those embedded taxes from the price and show that 23% separately on the receipt.

Are you saying that after the income tax is eliminated and the Fair Tax is put in place, prices will be (roughly) equivalent?

80 posted on 03/18/2011 9:00:59 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson