Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: No-fly zone means bombing
Politico ^

Posted on 03/17/2011 12:10:04 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Clinton: No-fly zone means bombing

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned Thursday that establishing a United Nations-sanctioned no-fly zone over Libya would require bombing targets of Muammar Qadhafi’s regime there.

“A no-fly zone requires certain actions taken to protect the planes and the pilots, including bombing targets like the Libyan defense systems,” Clinton said in Tunis, her last stop on a trip that also took her to Cairo and Paris.

In all her stops, Clinton’s done a mix of stressing the need for democracy in post-revolution Tunisia and Egypt, and pushing for international cooperation in responding to the crisis in Libya. On Thursday, her only full day in Tunisia, Clinton promised that the United States “will stand with you as you make the transition to democracy, prosperity and a better future.”

Clinton’s remarks came as the United Nations Security Council prepared to vote later Thursday on a resolution to create the no-fly zone.

(Excerpt) Read more at dyn.politico.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 03/17/2011 12:10:06 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Wow - we went from “no fly zone” to “bomb what we want zone” pretty fast...


2 posted on 03/17/2011 12:11:54 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

NO SHIITE!


3 posted on 03/17/2011 12:12:09 PM PDT by LibFreeUSA (Show me what Obama brought that was new and there you will find things only radical and destructive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Wag the dog.


4 posted on 03/17/2011 12:16:06 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
What's going on in Libya is civil war. I am wondering, what would Americans say is foreign powers intervened on behalf of one side or another in our Civil War? Just wondering.

Since when does international law allow for interference in a civil war that has not overflowed the national borders?

5 posted on 03/17/2011 12:16:29 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

A month ago no one had any intention of going in and taking out Qadhafi. Why should we be more inclined to take him out today then we were a month ago? Same guy today as a month ago. Doesn’t look any crazier today than a month ago.

If our goal was to take out Qadhafi we had a window last week. We blew it.


6 posted on 03/17/2011 12:16:32 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I wonder if this is the admin’s way of telling Qaddafi to hurry up...


7 posted on 03/17/2011 12:18:48 PM PDT by mewzilla (Were members of both political parties in on the Lockerbie bomber deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So Hillary listened to Gates.

... and this is why we should let the Europeans and the Arab League do it.

No one is going to love us if we do it. Not Daffy’s loyalists, not the Arab League, not the new Jihadis we’d be installing in his place, not Al Qaeda. So why do it?


8 posted on 03/17/2011 12:19:40 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Wow... mission creep before mission start.


9 posted on 03/17/2011 12:20:14 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Not one drop of American blood for muslims in Libya or anywhere else!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned Thursday that establishing a United Nations-sanctioned no-fly zone over Libya would require bombing targets of Muammar Qadhafi’s regime there.

Whaddayaknow... Hillary is SecDef, too!

10 posted on 03/17/2011 12:21:49 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Not one drop of American blood for muslims in Libya or anywhere else!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
So why do it?

Baraqaddafi needs to appear decisive. All about The One, you know...

11 posted on 03/17/2011 12:23:20 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Not one drop of American blood for muslims in Libya or anywhere else!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
So why do it?

Baraqaddafi needs to appear decisive. All about The One, you know...

12 posted on 03/17/2011 12:23:24 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Not one drop of American blood for muslims in Libya or anywhere else!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
So why do it?

Baraqaddafi needs to appear decisive. All about The One, you know...

13 posted on 03/17/2011 12:23:24 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Not one drop of American blood for muslims in Libya or anywhere else!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

That was weird. Only hit “post” once, but it posted up three times.


14 posted on 03/17/2011 12:24:24 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Not one drop of American blood for muslims in Libya or anywhere else!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Well, if we entertain the idea of a no-fly zone, before that can begin, we gotta ace the Colonel’s air defense network.

As for myself, I think we should sit this one out. It’s another tar baby.


15 posted on 03/17/2011 12:24:33 PM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Why didn't W. think of this?

"Oh, we forgot to define our terms. 'No fly zone' means that if we detect so much as a single housefly taking wing, anywhere in your country, we're going to bomb you into oblivion."

16 posted on 03/17/2011 12:25:48 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

By saying “bombing would be required” they’re really simply trying to give themselves an out for doing NOTHING —what Obama does best.

Besides eat ice-cream, sound reaaaaly unruffled, or hit the beaches in Rio.

They’re trying to minimize the political cost with their whacko left BASE of doing nothing.

Those rebels are toast —hugely telling that they were appealing to GEORGE BUSH for help.


17 posted on 03/17/2011 12:27:32 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Why can’t he be appear decisive...Like Ronald Reagan and lob a cruise missile on his tent...?!?


18 posted on 03/17/2011 12:28:05 PM PDT by Ground0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Susan Rice: UN to vote at 6pm on Libya no-fly resolution
19 posted on 03/17/2011 12:30:35 PM PDT by mewzilla (Were members of both political parties in on the Lockerbie bomber deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Who CARES ? Both sides hate us!!!!!


20 posted on 03/17/2011 12:31:09 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson