Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Reticent
National Review ^ | March 22, 2011 | Stanley Kurtz

Posted on 03/22/2011 11:13:07 AM PDT by Plutarch

Obama doesn’t tell you what he’s thinking. He keeps his motives to himself. Cherished long-term ideological goals are advanced as pragmatic fixes to concrete problems in the present. Now we’re seeing the familiar domestic pattern in foreign policy as well.

Few Americans realize that Obama has had a longstanding interest in multilateral efforts to combat war crimes and genocide. Obama would like to see a more constraining international legal regime on war crimes, even at the cost of national sovereignty, not to mention the blood and treasure of the countries doing the enforcing. In general, Obama has said little about his larger foreign policy goals. To the extent that he has done so, Obama seems more the “realist” than an advocate of humanitarian intervention.

Yet for years, Samantha Power, a prominent advocate of humanitarian intervention and a key backer of our action in Libya, has been a powerful member of Obama’s foreign policy team. In 2005, Obama contacted Power after reading her book on genocide. There followed a long conversation, after which Power left Harvard to work for Obama, quic‘kly emerging as his senior foreign policy advisor.

{excerpt}

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Old Teufel Hunden

Which of those three pre-conditions was met? The language of the WPA is absolute in regard to them.


21 posted on 03/22/2011 12:20:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nolongerademocrat
We've been on Samantha Power at FR, and now National Review and Rush Limbaugh are catching up.


22 posted on 03/22/2011 12:23:41 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Face it, we have a full-fledged banana republic military junta for a government now.


23 posted on 03/22/2011 12:30:10 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
"Which of those three pre-conditions was met? The language of the WPA is absolute in regard to them."

The way I understand "pursuant to", it means that you can do something with one of the following three conditions met later. In other words, Obama can do this (per the War Powers Act) with one of those three conditions being met at a later date. In other words, Obama has to go to Congress to get a declaration of War or a Joint resolution. He hasn't done that part of the requirement yet, but he still has time to do them. So he can deliver this official notification to Congress with the idea that in the near future (I believe the War Powers Act gives him 30 days) he has to go to Congress to get a declaration of war or a joint resolution.
24 posted on 03/22/2011 12:34:30 PM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
"Face it, we have a full-fledged banana republic military junta for a government now."

We're in agreement on that one...
25 posted on 03/22/2011 12:35:49 PM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Out of all of those clowns in the pictures who advocate us going into Darfur militarily, I’ll bet not one of them has put on the uniform to risk his own rear end. Yet, they want to send our troops in to risk their lives in a conflict that has no U.S. national interests.


26 posted on 03/22/2011 12:37:44 PM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
The way I understand "pursuant to", it means that you can do something with one of the following three conditions met later.

The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situation where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances,...

What does the word 'before' mean?

27 posted on 03/22/2011 12:41:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

I would also point out that the word ‘pursuant’ means ‘to follow’ or ‘following’ or ‘requisite upon’ and the three conditions of that paragraph are the things set forth to be followed by “...to introduce United States Armed Forces into...”


28 posted on 03/22/2011 12:53:23 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

It’s not worth arguing over. The fact is that he’s not in compliance with the Constitution. Thats the most important point.


29 posted on 03/22/2011 7:59:41 PM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
The rule of law is not worth arguing about? OK.

I didn't know we were having an argument.

30 posted on 03/22/2011 8:09:28 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Das is richtig, Devil Dog!


31 posted on 03/22/2011 10:43:12 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

He is not an idiot. He is a well-schooled Alinskyite, very focused, extremely driven, and highly skilled at manipulating people. He has handled his handlers.


32 posted on 03/22/2011 10:45:06 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
"I didn't know we were having an argument."

Perhaps debate is a better word then.
33 posted on 03/23/2011 4:25:39 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson