Blame it on Rio!
Posted on 03/23/2011 6:12:55 AM PDT by quesney
The allies in the U.S.-led military operation in Libya debated a new command structure Tuesday, with differences over the ultimate aims and scope of the campaign impeding an agreement, as forces loyal to dictator Moammar Gadhafi shelled the coastal city of Misurata.
There were also growing questions about how much the Odyssey Dawn operation will cost and who will pay for it [Hint: We will, as usual], as many participating nations are dealing with budget constraints in the aftermath of the global economic downturn.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
A better name for this action would be Operation Cluster F**k.
“This is not finalized, so I don’t want to suggest that it is,” said Ben Rhodes, deputy national security adviser for strategic communications. “This is still being worked in Brussels.”
That’s called “Strategic Communications” in Washington. Much like Social (In)Security. The Department of (Borderless) Homeland (In) Security. Federal (lack of a) budget. Etc.
Americans wanted an EEO President; this is what happens when you get one.
Unqualified, undignified, unprepared and arrogant enough to think that his race alone, is justification enough for anything he wants to do.
Encourage our enemies, and discourage our allies - nice going Zero.
I am going to send your suggestion to my obama-butt kissing senators
thanks
B I N G O !!!!!
President Charlie Fox.
This whole thing has stunk of a setup from the beginning, but then, Obama's generation never did read Uncle Remus, so there's no way he'd recognize this Lybian adventure as a tar baby.
Besides the Chicago mob, I mean?
MSM is still 100% on board the Obama train wreck
Well, there's always the One...
Drudge Headline
BIDEN FLASHBACK: ‘If he gives authorization to war... without Congressional approval, I will make it my business to impeach him!’
Also - It’s Hillary’s fault.
On Obama, Libya and Gender
By Elana Maryles Sztokman
President Obama’s decision to bomb Libya apparently has something to do with gender.
The New York Times reports that Obama was waffling on whether to attack, while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was in favor, but having trouble convincing the president. It was only when she recruited two other women to form a coalition that Obama made the decision to act. “The change became possible,” the Times writes, “only after Mrs. Clinton joined Samantha Power, a senior aide at the National Security Council, and Susan Rice, Mr. Obama’s ambassador to the United Nations, who had been pressing the case for military action….Now, the three women were pushing for American intervention to stop a looming humanitarian catastrophe in Libya.”
This coalition of women is apparently up against a coalition of men. Under a headline “Obama agenda: The women vs. the men, Andrea Mitchell reported that “In the end, it became the women foreign policy advisers against the men. …
Continued....
Read more: http://blogs.forward.com/sisterhood-blog/136353/#ixzz1HQL1uVvh
“Also - It’s Hillary’s fault.
Depend on it... “O” will work THIS one to death!! It effectively put Evita out of the running in 2012!!
Or.. circle jerk!
Fire
Aim
Insinuate
Lie
FAIL, for short.
LOL! Good one!
I like Operation “SPANK THE MONKEY”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.