Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AwesomePossum
Some smart minds need to explain this to me. I'm a boiler maintenance mechanic. The number one rule of boiler safety is to never-ever add water to a hot boiler gone low or dry. The reason for this is that water expands 1,600 times by volume when converted to steam. One pound of water added to a dry boiler is like five sticks of dynamite.

So........How do you introduce cooling water back into a superheated nuclear mass without an expolosion? I would think you would have to first boil the water into superheated steam (400 to 600 degrees) and then gradually throttle back the steam temperature once the heat absorption from the nuclear material settles the steam climb at an upper limit line to begin cooling from.

Any smart folks out there who can idjucate me would be appreciated.

6 posted on 03/23/2011 1:18:51 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blackdog

Not schmart folk here but the cooling pools aren’t enclosed like the boiler. Yes, the water would initially flash off but most or all of the rods in the pools are partially covered anyway. P.S. Interesting statistics you gave about the amount of volume expansion and explosive potential in an enclosed system.


14 posted on 03/23/2011 1:28:05 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture (Could be worst in 40 years))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: blackdog

You add it under pressure?


15 posted on 03/23/2011 1:28:19 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: blackdog
> So........How do you introduce cooling water back into a superheated nuclear mass without an expolosion? I would think you would have to first boil the water into superheated steam (400 to 600 degrees) and then gradually throttle back the steam temperature once the heat absorption from the nuclear material settles the steam climb at an upper limit line to begin cooling from. Any smart folks out there who can idjucate me would be appreciated.

I wonder the same thing. I assume they're introducing it to the superheated areas slowly enough that the expansion can take place slowly enough to be safely contained.

Hell, I don't add cold water or oil to an overheated car engine, much less to an overheated reactor core.

I also assume that the amount of water they are able to "sprinkle" down from firehoses and whatnot is not contained, since the buildings are open, so while they'll get vapor expansion, it's happening in free air, essentially.

But I'm not there, and I'm not an expert... just a guy with a 35-year old physics degree... who wonders the same thing.

16 posted on 03/23/2011 1:29:23 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: blackdog

They are dealing with several situations that confused the public.

1. The primary containment, the reinforced concrete building that houses the reactor was never breached. Pressure from that is vented into the sheet metal and structural steel building on top of the reactor. That is where the hyfrogen ignited after it was vented.

2. The reactor vents into a torus, larged water filled structure, which reduces pressure.

3. The spent fuel pools, stainless steel lined concrete, which are outside the primary containment and which are probably now exposed have been the target of the helicopter water drops and the water from the fire engine deck guns.

4. In this country both the reactor, RPV, and the steel lined reinforced containment buildings are ASME pressure vessels.


18 posted on 03/23/2011 1:33:04 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: blackdog

Given the situation, seems like water (maybe mixed with boron or other chemicals to stop or slow down the reaction) is their only and best way to cool things down, and venting (radioactivity-filled steam) is their controlled way or reducing the resulting pressure instead of having the roofs blown off more reactor buildings by hydrogen explosions and damaging other components in the process

They have just been dumping seawater into the buildings and refilling the fuel storage pool. Steam and pressure must be better choices than not cooling as fast as possible

These heroes at this facility just seem to be dealing with choosing a bad choice or chancing a worse choice


19 posted on 03/23/2011 1:33:39 PM PDT by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: blackdog

I dont usually rely much on Wiki but if you do some reading about light water reactors in general and Fukushima in particular it may help, give your mechanical background

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_I_nuclear_accidents#Cooling_requirements

then come back here and explain it to us!


26 posted on 03/23/2011 1:46:40 PM PDT by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: blackdog; dayglored

The reason they can do that is because they are continuously venting.

I also believe they are doing more than venting. Remember the report yesterday about how they increased the amount of sea water by 9 times in reactor core 1(I believe) in order to cool it down.

Now it does not take much understanding to figure out that the coolant outlet is therefore wide open with the water running onto the land and into the sea. I believe that there no longer is a coolant loop. They are simply blasting water in and letting it run out into the environment. A continuing last effort attempt to prevent total meltdown. This prevents steam pressure buildup.


40 posted on 03/23/2011 1:58:23 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: blackdog

I think a BWR is a little more like a tea kettle than a coal / oil / natural gas steam boiler. Which over-simplifies things hugely, I’m sure.


69 posted on 03/23/2011 2:23:46 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: blackdog

A very good question indeed.

As a guy who has burned a lot of welding rod in the last 30+ years, I have seen some amazing things happen after throwing red hot steel into water. Cracking and huge changes in hardness are not uncommon.

By the same token, what are the alternatives?


152 posted on 03/23/2011 4:10:31 PM PDT by Clay Moore (The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of a fool to the left. Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: blackdog

You start by designing the pressure vessel and safety systems for a worst case senario, i.e., not to blow up during a core re-wet after a LOCA.

If all else fails you bend over and kiss your ass goodbye.

175 posted on 03/23/2011 5:56:02 PM PDT by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: blackdog

Yes. Learned in Maritime firefighting school.


246 posted on 03/24/2011 4:52:15 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson