Skip to comments.
Conservatives take on Palin for gov-subsidized reality show, Palin calls criticism ludicrous
The Daily Caller ^
| 3/30/11
| Chris Moody
Posted on 03/30/2011 6:42:33 AM PDT by Anamnesis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
1
posted on
03/30/2011 6:42:41 AM PDT
by
Anamnesis
To: Anamnesis
One woman’s ludicrous is another one’s government subsidy, apparently.
2
posted on
03/30/2011 6:43:31 AM PDT
by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(What if God doesn't want the Gospel rescued from the fundamentalists?)
To: Anamnesis; onyx; Virginia Ridgerunner
3
posted on
03/30/2011 6:45:16 AM PDT
by
Anamnesis
To: Anamnesis
And do the same people reject Adam Smith and the ideas in the Wealth of Nations because he worked collecting tolls for the government of his time?
4
posted on
03/30/2011 6:45:28 AM PDT
by
JLS
(Democrats: People who won't even let you enjoy an unseasonably warm winter day.)
To: Anamnesis
Oh, brother! They’re really scraping for something to pin on Sarah. How pathetic.
I believe that Gov. Corbett has decided not to remove the tax credit for companies wanting to film in PA as well. Get the noose!
5
posted on
03/30/2011 6:45:28 AM PDT
by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
To: Anamnesis
6
posted on
03/30/2011 6:46:24 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("...crush the bourgeoisie... between the millstones of taxation and inflation." --Vladimir Lenin)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
What she did is obviously illegal.
Calling Eric Holder!
7
posted on
03/30/2011 6:47:22 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("...crush the bourgeoisie... between the millstones of taxation and inflation." --Vladimir Lenin)
To: ReneeLynn
Actually, it's not just PA or AK. 44 out of 50 states have such deals in place, making this criticism even more ludicrous.
8
posted on
03/30/2011 6:48:39 AM PDT
by
Anamnesis
To: Anamnesis
Tucker Carlson of Daily Crawler and Jim Geraghty of National (non)Review have PDS really, really bad.
They need to stop calling themselves conservative and go by their real brand: establishment, cocktail party RINO's!!!
9
posted on
03/30/2011 6:50:32 AM PDT
by
Jane Long
(2 Chron 7:14)
To: Anamnesis
Yes. Bringing IN revenue to any state seems to be a crime now. They’re acting as if Sarah has personally benefitted instead of the state.
10
posted on
03/30/2011 6:51:02 AM PDT
by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
To: Anamnesis
The concept of a profitable return on national advertising for a show about your state, escapes these morons.
LLS
11
posted on
03/30/2011 6:51:24 AM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(WOLVERINES!!!)
To: Anamnesis
Did she get the money from Alaska or did TLC get it? Most states like Oregon are using state dollars to attract the film industry.
Pray for America
12
posted on
03/30/2011 6:53:25 AM PDT
by
bray
(Hey Country Club, hold your noses this election!)
To: Anamnesis
“44 out of 50 states have such deals in place”
It’s likely true that if Alaska didn’t take the money, some other state would get it. If that’s the case then it’s a no-brainer for any State government.
13
posted on
03/30/2011 6:54:39 AM PDT
by
frposty
(I'm a simpleton)
To: Anamnesis
States have way more leeway to do these kinds of things. Nothing at all wrong with this and totally Constitutional, unlike when the FEDERAL GOVT does these things with no Constitutional mandate, stealing money from one state to give to another.
To: bray
The production company, Jean Worldwide Incorporated, applied for the subsidy, not Palin herself.
To: Anamnesis
16
posted on
03/30/2011 6:55:37 AM PDT
by
FrankR
(The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
One womans ludicrous is another ones government subsidy, apparently. If you consider a tax credit (in other words a reduction in tax liability) incentive for doing business in the state to be a government subsidy, then you are entitled to that opinion. But in that sense, every tax abatement or other tax concession made by every other taxing authority in the country is also a "government subsidy". Of course, that position requires, to some extent, a notion that the money is the government's money to begin with and that by letting a private party keep some of that money in return for doing business in the state the government is "giving away" money.
17
posted on
03/30/2011 6:57:12 AM PDT
by
VRWCmember
(Veritas vos Liberabit)
To: Anamnesis
"Perhaps it would behoove people to learn much more about the 49th states young economy before making broad accusations about the efficacy of business programs." Hey, DC Republicans! You see this? It's called defending yourself and your record. You need to learn how to do it instead of puddling the floor and hiding under your desks every time the RATS call you a name.
18
posted on
03/30/2011 6:58:39 AM PDT
by
Dahoser
(Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
To: FrankR
19
posted on
03/30/2011 6:59:19 AM PDT
by
agere_contra
(As often as I look upon the cross, so often will I forgive with all my heart.)
To: VRWCmember
Relax dude, I’m just pulling y’all’s chains.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson