House bill would require proof of candidate's birth

Tulsa World ^ | March 31, 2011 | WAYNE GREENE

[CottShop]

[[Is this another bill/law that will be squashed? lol]]

It’s another bill/law that some future muslim/american democrat WILL simply ignore knowing that the lamestream media will NEVER question them or hold them accountable when running for president-

[CottShop]

[[Do you think this means I’ll have to prove I’m eligible to perform brain surgery before I’m hired by a hospital?]]

Not if you’re an african american liberal- no credentials needed- the liberal press will have your back- keeping all prying eyes from uncovering anyhtign damning on ya.

[T. Jefferson]

Pending Bills

Connecticut, SB291 require “that candidates for president and vice-president provide their original birth certificates in order to be placed on the ballot.” That is needed to make sure the candidate “is a natural born United States citizen, prior to certifying that the candidate is qualified to appear on the ballot.”

Georgia, HB37 not only demands original birth-certificate documentation, it provides a procedure for and declares that citizens have “standing” to challenge the documentation.

Indiana, SB114 to require candidates to provide a certified copy of their birth certificate and include an affirmation they meet the Constitution’s requirements for the president.

Maine, LD34 require for all candidates for public office to provide proof of citizenship. It states, “A candidate for nomination by primary election shall show proof of United States citizenship in the form of a certified copy of the candidate’s birth certificate and the candidate’s driver’s license or other government-issued identification to the Secretary of State.”

Missouri , HB283, require that certification for candidates “shall include proof of identity and proof of United States citizenship.”

Nebraska, LB654, the certification for candidates would “include affidavits and supporting documentation.”

That paperwork would need to document they meet the “eligibility requirements of Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.” It requires an affidavit that says: “I was born a citizen of the United States of America and was subject exclusively to the jurisdiction of the United States of America, owing allegiance to no other country at the time of my birth.”

Montana’s plan that candidates would have to document their eligibility and also provide for protection for state taxpayers to prevent them from being billed for “unnecessary expense and litigation” involving the failure of ‘federal election officials’ to do their duty.

Oklahoma, SB91 would require “proof of citizenship for certain candidates” and take the openness one step further, allowing the public access. It demands an “original” birth certificate issued by a state, the federal government, or documentation of a birth of a U.S. citizen abroad.

Pennsylvania working on a proposal that would demand documentation of constitutional eligibility making sure that presidential candidates meet the Constitution’s requirements for age, residency and being a “natural born citizen.”

Texas House Bill 295 A bill filed for the Texas Legislature that would require candidates’ documentation. It would add to the state election code the provision: “The secretary of state may not certify the name of a candidate for president or vice-president unless the candidate has presented the candidate’s original birth certificate indicating that the person is a natural-born United States citizen.”

Arizona Bill within ten days after submittal of the names of the candidates, the national political party committee shall submit an affidavit of the presidential candidate in which the presidential candidate states the candidate’s citizenship and age and shall append to the affidavit documents that prove that the candidate is a natural born citizen, prove the candidate’s age and prove that the candidate meets the residency requirements for President of the United States as prescribed in article II, section 1, Constitution of the United States.

[American Constitutionalist]

" A bill pending with the state House of Representatives would require presidential primary candidates to prove they are natural-born U.S. citizens by showing their birth certificate to the election board. "

This should be for all primaries and general elections.. don't leave them room to cheap or voter fraud.

[American Constitutionalist]

" If this passes (which, unfortunately it won’t)Obama won’t be able to run in 2012. "

It's a proposed law for those who are running in the state's primaries, not general election, they need to change the language to state, primaries and general elections.

[American Constitutionalist]

" Not in Oklahoma this time. Both the legislature and governor are conservative GOP. "

Those who live in Oklahoma need to call their state's legislators and demand that the language in the bill state and make it very clear, both, primaries, and general elections,, don't leave them room to cheat.

[American Constitutionalist]

( * Georgia, HB37 not only demands original birth-certificate documentation, it provides a procedure for and declares that citizens have “standing” to challenge the documentation. * ) ..

Georgia's bills sounds like the winner.

They also need to add in it, that both parents need to be either born here or naturalized citizens.
Might as well add in there other documents as proof.

[Tunehead54]

4 am bump! ;-)