Skip to comments.
Libyan rebel leader says NATO isn't doing enough
Daily Finance/AP ^
| 6/4/11
| BEN HUBBARD and HADEEL AL-SHALCHI
Posted on 04/05/2011 5:34:39 PM PDT by Eleutheria5
See full article from DailyFinance: http://srph.it/eV67Qv
If you really must see anything beyond the headline.
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: libya; nato; obama; rebels
To: Eleutheria5
Libyan rebel leader says Obama isn't doing enough Only an idiot would look to Obama for help when going to war.
To: Eleutheria5
I believe that we have done far too much for the goat porkers already.
3
posted on
04/05/2011 5:38:53 PM PDT
by
Howie66
(I can see November (2012) from my house.)
To: Eleutheria5
Of course , we owe the bag of shit a golden throne, could someone give me a reasonable reason why this dirt bag is worth billions of tax payers money.
To: org.whodat
I’d say send them some Abraham Lincoln Brigade veterans, but the nursing homes would miss them.
5
posted on
04/05/2011 5:46:56 PM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: Eleutheria5
"He said bureaucracy means that NATO strikes sometimes come eight hours after rebels' have communicated targets. Gotta love that multilateral cooperation!
To: who_would_fardels_bear
He wouldn’t consider...uh...whatayacallit...uh...fighting his own battles?
7
posted on
04/05/2011 6:14:31 PM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: tsowellfan
Precisely, Tintin. Or more precisely, only an idiot would go to war when looking to Obama for help.
8
posted on
04/05/2011 6:22:00 PM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: Eleutheria5
“Libyan rebel leader says NATO isn’t doing enough”
Maybe, but still more than you.
I think NATO got cold feet, if Daffy Duck spread the Al Qaida rumor, it was brilliant. Any ruler that survived 42 years in that hood is neither dumb, nor a nice guy.
9
posted on
04/05/2011 7:15:03 PM PDT
by
mewykwistmas
(We can either have a free market economy or socialism, TARPers, GM and GE can't have it both ways.)
To: Eleutheria5
This cat does understand that NATO is an alliance meant to defend Europe from the Warsaw pact, right? Because NATO is kickin’ ass at that.
10
posted on
04/05/2011 7:21:11 PM PDT
by
Spruce
To: Howie66
To: suzynrogers
12
posted on
04/05/2011 7:41:24 PM PDT
by
Howie66
(I can see November (2012) from my house.)
To: suzynrogers
13
posted on
04/05/2011 8:21:16 PM PDT
by
unkus
To: mewykwistmas; Admin Moderator
Can we please clean this place up, Mods? I’m supposed to believe that “rebels” in Libya, slaughtering civilians, and backed in public by Iran, are a creation of Qaddafi’s imagination?
14
posted on
04/05/2011 11:08:16 PM PDT
by
Carling
(Obama: Inexperienced and incompetent, yet ego maniacal. God help us all.)
To: Spruce
The fact that there’s no more Warsaw Pact might explain that, though.
15
posted on
04/05/2011 11:49:43 PM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: Eleutheria5
Now, when a bomb goes off in Italy, France or Germany, is it because of Qaddafi taking revenge...
Or will it be by "Rebel" (i.e. al-qaeda) supporters because NATO did not do enough to assist them???
16
posted on
04/06/2011 12:10:41 AM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Greed + Envy = Liberalism)
To: Cowboy Bob
Could be both, when they forge an alliance.
17
posted on
04/06/2011 1:43:25 PM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson