What DON’T they object to?
Someone help me out - are they objecting to the war that freed the slaves? This is bizarro world.
If democrats are objecting to that, it’s perfectly understandle, seeing as how the rats are trying to re-institute slavery.
I’m going back to bed. Wake me up when we land back on Earth.
who cares what they think, like, dislike?
“It seems to be honoring something that reminds us of some tragic occurrences that happened to our people at the time. The whole war itself centered around the slave issue,” said R.L. White, president of the NAACP’s Atlanta branch. “We accept that it’s history but would like to see it done somewhere else than the heart of the civil rights historic district. It’s kind of tragic that the state is choosing that location.”
It literally makes no sense for the NAACP to object to an historical marker put in the history district of Atlanta. Why in the world is it “tragic” for the state of Georgia to choose that location? My only thought is that the NAACP, besides being inveterate complainers, feel that MLK Drive should not be overshadowed in any way by another historical reference. Honestly, I was surprised there was not already a commemoration of the burning of Atlanta.
Every thoroughfare named after MLK I’ve ever encountered has been an artery of crime running through the city. Want drugs, a prostitute, or just to be shot? Check out MLK Jr. Drive.
What is the NAACP complaining about? Are they not aware that the fall of Atlanta was a Confederate defeat and a Union victory?
Sherman Happens!
I think they’re objecting to having whitey do anything in their black separatist district.
Sounds like a logical place to place the marker, but the NAACP has never had much going for it in the way of logic.