The constitution doesn't address marriage, you big dope.
As for hateful people, the left far outnumbers the right. I'll bet most of the haters were posers.
Posted on 04/15/2011 11:16:18 PM PDT by braf
Edited on 04/16/2011 7:15:11 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
American Association for Trolls's former trolling organizer, social-media trolling guru, and outspoken trolling advocate, has spent "the last five years putting all of [his] interest and energy into trolling FR, his own disease," by his own account. Until today. When he got the zot. But he'll be back. Trolls just can't help themselves.
“The constitution calls for nothing less.”
Someone has been reading the Ruth Bader-Ginsburg Edition of the Constitution as opposed to the original 1787.
Sniff, sniff...
I’m waiting for the other loafer to drop.
“Once you understand the great difference between civil marriage and holy marriage,”
There is no difference.....both are before the eyes of God.......Marriage is between one man and one woman..or it can be anything....there is no “in between”...
IIRC the proper term for his reaction and midlife crisis is “going native”...
Uh, I'm Catholic and we are Christians! So I'm suppose to listen to someone that makes a statement like this? And even if I thought civil marriage was OK for gays, as soon as gays were given that right you KNOW they would insist that either the churches accept their right to marry or lose their tax exempt status. It's a slippery slope to take away religious freedom.
But if a Church refuses to marry a gay couple are they not then making a political statement or spreading hate? If a church refused to marry an interracial couple could they not lose their tax exempt status?
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Hey Louis, and anyone else who supports homosexual "marriage" - you know what's hateful? Promoting sexual perversion and mental illness as natural and normal, and even worse, forcing others to accept, tolerate, celebrate or any other way support mental, physical and spiritual sickness. Homosexuals are not born, they are made - mostly be being molested when young by older homosexuals. Fatherless families don't help either. And schools and media telling kids that "gay is good" and "if you've ever had a gay thought/desire/experience - you're one of OURS and you cannot change!" Now that is hate speech.
And the more the lies of the homosexual are pushed down the collective throat of society, the more peoples' lives are ruined. It's not hateful to criticize the "gay" agenda, it's sanity. It's tough love. Seek help. Don't seek to change society, because that's what "gay" marriage is actually all about - destroying the natural family and real marriage.
I seriously smell a troll. This was an infiltration from the beginning, to accomplish just such a smear.
I was wondering. Posting history looked fairly normal-ish. Such as it is, signup date is what, 3 days ago?
And no comment, just the article.
Headline makes it sound like this guy is just one person in a big organization. Then we learn he is “The sole founder and organizer”. No media bias here, huh?
Troll? Yeah, I picked up the scent, as well.
The constitution doesn't address marriage, you big dope.
As for hateful people, the left far outnumbers the right. I'll bet most of the haters were posers.
Mole.
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.
Wait, you are Louis J. Marinelli? LOL, the “Two Cents and a Couple of Copecs” guy who was on XM on several programs and claimed to be part of NOM? LOL. It kind of fits, you made the worst arguments on almost all issues you ranted on with no logic whatsoever. It is almost like you were setting up this day.
Your equal protection argument is asinine because we no longer have equal protection with your belief. The law no longer applies equally and is blind to one’s sexual orientation. Now, a different set of rules apply to those who are gay versus those who are straight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.