[traditional1]

What we actually have today, is a half-breed, not born of two American Citizens at the time of his birth. Whether he was born on American soil is not the issue. The issue is the proving he's the offspring of two U.S. Citizens ON AMERICAN SOIL, at the time of his birth.

Even though it appears that his "parents" were not married at the time, either, and his Mother was just bedding down with a black dude, he would still be "Natural Born" IF they were both U.S. Citizens.

[Para-Ord.45]

Check it out :

“The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a NATIVE citizen of the United States of America.”

http://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate

Now this:

Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.

” NO person except a NATURAL born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. “

The article says “...Natural born...” and then “... ,or a citizen of the United States, ...”

Commas separate ideas and the USSC and never ruled on the issue.

[null and void]

Your phrasing sounds a bit racist, but your underlying point is valid.

This would be a non-issue if he really was the love child of Stanley Ann and Malcolm X.

That his reputed father was not (and indeed never even became) a US citizen should by itself disqualify him.

The other really big story trying to escape from under this is Hawaii’s institutional fraud in granting factually false birth documents to pad their welfare rolls and suck down mainland tax dollars.

The other big endgame is “bulletproof” federal ID tracking...