Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Conservatives Make ‘Atlas Shrugged’ A Hit?
The Wall Street Journal ^ | April 15, 2011 | Anthony Kaufman

Posted on 04/16/2011 10:47:22 PM PDT by presidio9

After more than 50 years, Ayn Rand’s seminal novel and ode to free market capitalism “Atlas Shrugged” is finally hitting the big screen this weekend, in the first of a planned trilogy of movies. Independently produced and distributed by entrepreneur John Aglialoro, chairman of UM Holdings Inc, the film “Atlas Shrugged, Part 1″ was budgeted under $10 million and includes a cast of little-known actors (newcomer Taylor Schilling stars as the powerful female industrialist Dagny Taggart).

At one time, Algialoro, who optioned the book’s rights 18 years ago, had struck up a partnership with Lionsgate Films to make a version of the movie, possibly as a TV miniseries for the new EPIX cable outfit. But when the project dragged on without getting the green light, Algialoro turned to entertainment attorney and executive producer Harmon Kaslow to get the film made quickly before the rights to the book reverted back to the Ayn Rand estate. Shot in just 26 days and completed several months later, the entire film’s creation, from green light to this week’s release, took about a year, according to Kaslow.

Reaching out to conservative organizations such as the Cato Institute,

-SNIP-

While advance interest in the film may be high among the film’s conservative base, reviews have been terrible. For example,

-SNIP-

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angelinajolie; atlasshrugged; aynrand; dagnytaggart; grahambeckel; johnnydepp; michaelokeefe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last
Saw Atlas Shrugged tonight. Full disclosure: I enjoy Rand's novels as allegorical science fiction/alternate universe stuff. The worlds of The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged don't really resemble this world due to their total lack of characters with religious covictions and morality. I accept that its possible I'm missing something, but it is more likely it is Rand herself who missed something growing up as a secular Jew in an athiest society.

That being said, I enjoyed this movie, but I was somewhat disappointed by the inconsistent quality of the acting. The only actor who impressed me was Graham Beckel (Wyatt), though I probably came prepared to enjoy seeing him in this movie. And even he overdid it in his initial meeting with Dagny. The immortal Michael O'Keefe was a good pick for Akston in a mostly unknown cast, though his role in this movie was pretty minimal. More from him later.

Setting the film in the near future was a nice political touch that probably went a long way towards pissing off the "professional" ctitics, who may or may not have actually read the book itself. That being said, the adaptation is probably too literal. This could (and should) have been an initiation to Rand's work. Instead, we a left with an overly complex triptic that will probably only been appreciated by Rand fans. It's probably a good thing that the movie was made with such a small budget. It won't make much at the box office.

1 posted on 04/16/2011 10:47:24 PM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I don’t see how any movie rushed in 26 days could be that phenomenal. Sounds like this wasn’t thought out well... better to not be done at all than butchered.


2 posted on 04/16/2011 10:53:51 PM PDT by streetpreacher (I'm not a preacher of anything; I'm just a recipient and unworthy steward of God's grace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
i'm just glad it wasn't Angelina and company...
3 posted on 04/16/2011 11:00:04 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I have a feeling the movie will sell a lot of DVDs. Many people (like me, for example) enjoy movies but do not enjoy today’s movie theater experience.


4 posted on 04/16/2011 11:07:25 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher

For a movie heavily dependent on dialogue,,with a good crew, and good planning, 26 days is a reasonable shooting schedule.
And remember, it was in post-production for a year.
And it appears to have worked fine.

Not everything has the shooting schedule of “Jaws”.


5 posted on 04/16/2011 11:08:30 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chode; streetpreacher
i'm just glad it wasn't Angelina and company...

Have you seen the film yet? Sometimes I got the distinct impression that there was a TelePrompter hidden somewhere on set, and Taylor Schilling (Dagny) & Grant Bowler (Rearden) were reading from it. The acting was that bad occasionally. I agree with Streetpreacher: This one could have used a bit more simmering.

6 posted on 04/16/2011 11:09:35 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I have a feeling the movie will sell a lot of DVDs. Many people (like me, for example) enjoy movies but do not enjoy today’s movie theater experience.

If you enjoy movies, may I suggest "It's A Wonderful Life?" This one is strictly for mild to hardcore Rand fans.

7 posted on 04/16/2011 11:12:45 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher
I don’t see how any movie rushed in 26 days could be that phenomenal.

That's only four minutes of movie time per day. Not exactly a breakneck pace.

8 posted on 04/16/2011 11:17:52 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! Tea Party extremism is a badge of honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Im sure a lot of it’s popularity will come from people who are fans of the book and it’s capitalist story,,,just as im also sure others will whine about it because they dislike Rand *the person* on a personal level.


9 posted on 04/16/2011 11:18:56 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chode
"i'm just glad it wasn't Angelina and company.."

Angelina has her own disaster out now at Redbox. It's called "Tourist", and it's the sorriest "movie" that I have ever watched half of.

10 posted on 04/16/2011 11:21:13 PM PDT by matthew fuller (TRUMP RESONATES WITH AMERICANS, INDEPENDENTS, and PATRIOTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
unfortunately the nearest venue is 80+miles away, and i am saddened that that might be the case

i am still glad she/they had nothing to do with this film...

11 posted on 04/16/2011 11:22:53 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller
i rest my case...
12 posted on 04/16/2011 11:27:02 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller

I agree...how about when Angelina glides into a room in front of Johnny Depp, dressed to kill, and Johnny just stands there and says, “Oh, F**k”. I mean, Cary Grant he ain’t;)


13 posted on 04/16/2011 11:27:35 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Frank_2001; Chode; matthew fuller
I agree...how about when Angelina glides into a room in front of Johnny Depp, dressed to kill, and Johnny just stands there and says, “Oh, F**k”. I mean, Cary Grant he ain’t;)

The problem here was casting. Who goes to see Johnny Depp playing the normal guy? Any producer who was aware of John Belushi's painful "Neighbors" or "Continental Divide" would have put a quick stop to this. I'm not a huge Depp fan, but if you don't know that he can be fantastic at time, then you haven't seen all of his work.

14 posted on 04/16/2011 11:32:45 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher

Does it matter about the acting??

I would rather fork over my hard earned $$$$ to a film that is close to my principles with the worst acting on earth VS a liberal elitist anti-God liberal sermon of a film stacked with lefty Oscar winners.


15 posted on 04/16/2011 11:33:46 PM PDT by max americana ( NF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

>Who goes to see Johnny Depp playing the normal guy?

He played the “normal guy” in the Tourist’. OK..your priorities is awesome acting but not the objective of the film which is to preach the message of Rand.

Ok gotcha. I would rather give my cash to conservative actors who couldnt act their way OVER any lefty Oscar winner actor anytime and all the FN time.


16 posted on 04/16/2011 11:37:08 PM PDT by max americana ( NF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: max americana
I would rather fork over my hard earned $$$$ to a film that is close to my principles with the worst acting on earth VS a liberal elitist anti-God liberal sermon of a film stacked with lefty Oscar winners.

No need to fork over those $$$. Stay home and watch Star Trek reruns. Gene Roddenberry was a Rand disciple, and Shattner would have raised the bar on the quality of acting chops in this film.

17 posted on 04/16/2011 11:37:46 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Saw movie Friday night in one of the most capitalist cities in the country. Audience average age was mid-40s. Theater was about 90 percent packed. Everyone clapped at end.

My guesstimate is that this movie will do around $1.7 million the first weekend at the box office. Not bad for 300 screens. Distribution is key. If this had been released on as many screens as “Rio,” it would have earned a lot more.

Don’t see the numbers working out for parts 2 and 3, even with DVD sales, unless Atlas expands to more screens next week.


18 posted on 04/16/2011 11:39:55 PM PDT by peyton randolph (How's that hopey dopey changey thing working out for you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

How do you know Roddenberry was a Rand disciple when the entire series is all about multi-culturalism and the Federation is compared to the United Nations?


19 posted on 04/16/2011 11:40:17 PM PDT by max americana ( NF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: max americana
Actually, there are still PLENTY of wonderful conservative actors alive today. They just aren't vocal about their political views as Heston, the Duke, and Ronnie were. The less cowed ones occasionally appear on programs like Hannity.

The youngers ones are frequent guest on Red Eye, and if you own a DVR, you really should watch this show.

20 posted on 04/16/2011 11:43:48 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

The 1:45pm showing was nearly full, and there was lots of applause at the end. I think it’s a sleeper.


21 posted on 04/16/2011 11:44:01 PM PDT by scott7278 ("...I have not changed Congress and how it operates the way I would have liked..." - BHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

alrighty bro, I;ll drink to that!


22 posted on 04/16/2011 11:44:44 PM PDT by max americana ( NF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: max americana
How do you know Roddenberry was a Rand disciple when the entire series is all about multi-culturalism and the Federation is compared to the United Nations?

No doubt a future Rand might have anticipated?

23 posted on 04/16/2011 11:46:45 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

If it includes the 3-breasted hookers like in Total Recall, OK, I’ll make an exception.


24 posted on 04/16/2011 11:47:47 PM PDT by max americana ( NF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Now that I think about it, the last 20mins of a taped “Red Eye” are on FNC right now on the east coast.


25 posted on 04/16/2011 11:48:05 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Personally, I never got that “three breast vs. two hands” thing. And the actress was a total pig.


26 posted on 04/16/2011 11:49:56 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
While discussing sinful Rand, her imperfect works and their flawed adaptations the right plods righteously. When discussing Gore's pile of crap the left uses the opportunity to demean, demonize, destroy and marginalize the people and ideas of freedom. They try to kill their enemies.

I guess next year every freaking commercial will be on about individual responsibility like they are now about ***** (I can't even say the word anymore), yeah.


27 posted on 04/17/2011 12:01:25 AM PDT by I see my hands (Embrace misanthropy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Ayn Rand was as anti-God as any liberal.


28 posted on 04/17/2011 12:03:45 AM PDT by streetpreacher (Don't be part of the Karl Rove/Mark Levin Natural Born Losers Club; Fight Like a Girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Not that it takes away from her message or book. Just sayin’.


29 posted on 04/17/2011 12:04:41 AM PDT by streetpreacher (Don't be part of the Karl Rove/Mark Levin Natural Born Losers Club; Fight Like a Girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Seen it. I’m old.


30 posted on 04/17/2011 12:09:32 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Atlas screens are expanding next week. It doesn’t show here until next Friday. Despite what folks have said on this thread, I’m really looking forward to seeing it.

BTW, I’ve found two venues here in the Portland, Oregon metro area, and both are premier locations.


31 posted on 04/17/2011 12:18:12 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (Age, skill, wisdom, and a little treachery always overcome youth and arrogance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher
Ayn Rand was as anti-God as any liberal.

Her real complaint about religion was the "witch doctor" not God. The witch doctors are the real ones who pull the strings. God in her mind was simply there for the witch doctors to use.

32 posted on 04/17/2011 12:23:18 AM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The meek shall not inherit the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard; presidio9

LOL! I’m old, too...but I guess that makes my grands “old” as they have seen it, as well.

“It’s A Wonderful Life” is one of the best sleeper films ever. It wasn’t anywhere near being a hit when it was released.

BTW, I’m old, but not old enough to have seen it in it’s original release. ;o)


33 posted on 04/17/2011 12:24:54 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (Age, skill, wisdom, and a little treachery always overcome youth and arrogance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Saw the movie last night. It was awful. One star out of five.


34 posted on 04/17/2011 2:01:42 AM PDT by Crooked Constituent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts; streetpreacher

Ayn Rand once said to William F. Buckley Jr., “You are too intelligent to believe in God.” She was an open and proud God-hating atheist.


35 posted on 04/17/2011 3:08:18 AM PDT by LiveFree99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Well... I hate to trouble you with alternative opinions, but the fact is that the split between viewers and critics on this couldn't be wider. The people who have seen this movie liked it on the whole and this has held for the whole weekend. 10% fresh by the LSM critics and 85% fresh by viewing public.

Their marketing plan is right on the money and coming into this weekend, Fandango had Atlas Shrugged as 3rd in their sales list with only 299 theaters. That is huge because most major films hit 2500+ theaters.

On Box Office Mojo, 77% of viewers are ranking this movie an A. The first night's box office was approx. 683,000 est. or $2280/theater. That puts it near $2.3 Million this weekend in only 299 Theaters.

If this holds, expect the release to expand next weekend. Think "Blare Witch Project" with an LSM suppression field and tea partiers cheering. Who knows where this goes..

36 posted on 04/17/2011 3:37:10 AM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Only if it is an x rated move about the porcupine abilities of the author.
37 posted on 04/17/2011 4:40:59 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I saw the movie yesterday. Loved it. Although it showed some traces of not being a “high budget” mega production, it should please most open minded viewers who don’t depend on critics to tell them what they will like and not like. If your movie tastes mirror Roger Ebert’s, then don’ frustrate yourself. If we want more conservative movies to be released, then we should support the ones we have, even if they don’t meet the “standards” of Hollywood’s “finest”.


38 posted on 04/17/2011 4:57:31 AM PDT by TheConservativeBanker (Proud "Proofer".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Wasn’t “The King’s Speech” in only a few theaters to begin with?


39 posted on 04/17/2011 4:58:31 AM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch ( T.G., global warming denier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

“Many people (like me, for example) enjoy movies but do not enjoy today’s movie theater experience.”

LOL, for me it’s the office - I enjoy going out to see a movie, it is the “least worst” movie choice that we are usually faced with that I don’t enjoy!


40 posted on 04/17/2011 5:04:30 AM PDT by lowtaxsmallgov (This Administration has absolutely no idea how to grow an economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Mo1; ...
The Philadelphia Inquirer the other day gave a fairly good review and on the front page, believe it or not.

The local angle was Flyers owner Ed Snider being the producer.

41 posted on 04/17/2011 6:08:04 AM PDT by Tribune7 (We're flat broke, but he thinks these solar shingles and really fast trains will magically save us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalight

“The people who have seen this movie liked it on the whole and this has held for the whole weekend. 10% fresh by the LSM critics and 85% fresh by viewing public.”

I love the book despite its limitations and plan to see the movie, but realistically, the first round of viewers were “true believers” who have been chafing for months to see this. Unless they plan to see it weekend after weekend, the quality of audience reviews and the size of audiences seems likely to decline rather than pick up steam. In the broader public not “ideologically” disposed to see the film, I think the opinions of reviewers will matter (unfortunately). There’s bazillions of movies, going to movies is increasingly expensive, so people inevitably will rely on “experts” to help determine which ones are worth rolling the dice on.

It would be great if this were a blockbuster, but OBJECTIVELY, I don’t see that happening.


42 posted on 04/17/2011 6:53:51 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Chode; streetpreacher; presidio9
This one could have used a bit more simmering.

I saw the movie Friday and I agree that it is a flawed product.

However, I understand the context of why it is a flawed product, and I give the movie very high marks.

First off, Ayn Rand was a Hollywood screenwriter and extra who was favored by DeMille.
She was fairly instrumental in the HUAC hearings against Hollywood.

The Hollywood commies HATE her for HUAC and to this day will ensure that anything having anything remotely to do with her is torpedoed.

Add to this, the producers of the film were soon going to lose their option rights if they did not move quickly and put out SOMETHING.

So they said,
  1. Big money hollywood refuses to back us
  2. We are at the deadline to get this made
  3. We have $10M to do it with
  4. We can't afford Jolie or Pitt even if we wanted them
  5. Hollywood will torpedo any attempt we make to make this film "in the system"
  6. This movie HAS to be made NOW to fight what Obama and his Marxists are pulling off


Putting it in this context, what these guys pulled of was freakin' heroic.

I will be going back today and bringing my son and any of his friends he wants to bring.

Ultimately, this film is a Hail Mary pass to
  1. Get the message out
  2. Prove that it can be done against overwhelming Marxists odds
  3. To land big investors for Part 2 & 3


In these contexts Atlas Shrugged Part 1 absolutely nailed it.
I will be seeing it as many times as I can to ensure its success.

So if you go see it, keep the contexts and the wider battle in mind.

For all of that, it was the most impressive yet flawed movies I've seen.
43 posted on 04/17/2011 7:10:47 AM PDT by ct_libertarian (W.W.J.G.D? What would John Galt do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Have you seen it yet?


44 posted on 04/17/2011 7:58:37 AM PDT by GOPJ (Understanding the Koran: http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2009/05/terrifying-brilliance-of-islam.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Actually, Johnny depp was pretty darn handsome as a non.made up weirdo character. Was Angelina Jolie in the film too?lol. I daresay a lot of ladies weren’t watching tourist for Angelina...


45 posted on 04/17/2011 8:02:23 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LiveFree99

Atheists are so funny about G-d. Most of them say they don’t believe in a Creator because there is bad in the universe. So they would only believe, I guess, if G-d was as deep as Santa Claus and made everything perfect all the time. Their word view is so babyish.


46 posted on 04/17/2011 8:05:58 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ct_libertarian

Nice take, ct libertarian:

The Hollywood commies HATE her for HUAC and to this day will ensure that anything having anything remotely to do with her is torpedoed.

Add to this, the producers of the film were soon going to lose their option rights if they did not move quickly and put out SOMETHING.

So they said,

Big money hollywood refuses to back us
We are at the deadline to get this made
We have $10M to do it with
We can’t afford Jolie or Pitt even if we wanted them
Hollywood will torpedo any attempt we make to make this film “in the system”
This movie HAS to be made NOW to fight what Obama and his Marxists are pulling off

Putting it in this context, what these guys pulled of was freakin’ heroic.

I will be going back today and bringing my son and any of his friends he wants to bring.

Ultimately, this film is a Hail Mary pass to

Get the message out
Prove that it can be done against overwhelming Marxists odds
To land big investors for Part 2 & 3

In these contexts Atlas Shrugged Part 1 absolutely nailed it.
I will be seeing it as many times as I can to ensure its success.


47 posted on 04/17/2011 8:30:08 AM PDT by GOPJ (Understanding the Koran: http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2009/05/terrifying-brilliance-of-islam.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch

“Wasn’t “The King’s Speech” in only a few theaters to begin with?”

*****

Not sure. Sometimes that’s done for Academy Award purposes. Early limited release for timing to qualify for Oscar nominations and large release later.

For Atlas Shrugged, definitely not the case. More of universal loathing by left-wing Hollywood.

What’s funny is that if Atlas Shrugged does become a hit, Hollywood will use the movie’s existence as an example of how they are unbiased.


48 posted on 04/17/2011 8:57:21 AM PDT by peyton randolph (How's that hopey dopey changey thing working out for you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Not yet.


49 posted on 04/17/2011 9:50:12 AM PDT by Tribune7 (We're flat broke, but he thinks these solar shingles and really fast trains will magically save us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

On my way to see it right now.


50 posted on 04/17/2011 10:51:51 AM PDT by killermosquito (Buffalo, Detroit (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson