Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jean S

“No, she is legally entitled to a government paid recount if she asks for one. She has until tomorrow at 5pm to do so.”

Yes, you are right. I read the article I was looking at wrong. The recount would be at the taxpayers’ expense, but her legal teams that she would have to have to oversee the recount, would be an expense she would have to eat. My mistake. So, the question is, would she and/or the unions want to cough up the big bucks for the legal teams necessary in any recount vote. My guess is they will not ask for the recount, but we should know very shortly. Sorry for the mistake on my part, my bad. Need new spectacles.


24 posted on 04/19/2011 4:41:47 PM PDT by flaglady47 (When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: flaglady47

LOL, lucky for me I got new glasses last month.

I honestly don’t know what will happen next. I wouldn’t put it past the unions to push this into a recount. Kloppenburg is just a puppet. What idiot would announce victory with 204 votes unless told to by her masters?


25 posted on 04/19/2011 4:46:57 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: flaglady47

“My guess is they will not ask for the recount, but we should know very shortly. “

There should be a Prosser commercial ready to go about voter fraud being a crime and will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.


41 posted on 04/20/2011 9:15:17 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson