Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama administration shutters anti-porn task force
LifeSiteNews ^ | 4/20/11 | Kathleen Gilbert

Posted on 04/20/2011 11:33:07 AM PDT by wagglebee

WASHINGTON, D.C., April 20, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A Justice Department task force initiated under the Bush administration to fight the spread of hardcore pornography has been shut down by Obama’s attorney general.

Politico reported this week that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder closed the Obscenity Prosecution Task Force, a move that has been met with criticism by conservative congressmen and other leaders.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) urged Holder in an April 4 letter, signed by 41 other senators, including 6 Democrats, to change his mind.

“We know more than ever how illegal adult obscenity contributes to violence against women, addiction, harm to children, and sex trafficking. This material harms individuals, families and communities and the problems are only getting worse,” he wrote.

The Justice Department claims that the porn issue is better handled by lower U.S. attorneys and by the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section.

Dr. Judith Reisman, an internationally recognized expert on the harms of pornography, said she considered the task force to have been no better than a token initiative.

“While perfunctory, smoke screen pretenses were made under Bush now the cards are on the table,” said Reisman in an email to LifeSiteNews.com, adding that “even under [Reagan] we were spiked, not by him of course, but by those under him.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: culturewar; moralabsolutes; obamalegacy; pornification; pornography; sexpositiveagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: Sprite518

“Sorry folks but porn is not going (a)way”

It’s been here since the first cavemen sketched on walls, it will be here as long as men have sin and weakness in their hearts. You are right, it’s not going anywhere.


21 posted on 04/20/2011 12:05:42 PM PDT by Grunthor (The man or woman who doesn't forgive has forgotten the price that Christ paid for them on the Cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I might have missed something, but who on FR has ever spoken (or written) in favor of child porn? Seriously...


22 posted on 04/20/2011 12:07:38 PM PDT by HushTX (QQ more, libtard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HushTX

You might be surprised, just comments here and there and freepmails saying its not such a bad thing or that 13 year olds aren’t kids and are mature enough to decide.... libertarian thinking I guess.


23 posted on 04/20/2011 12:12:44 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

I don’t want to do your homework. Just go on google and look it up. You will find the Truth is hidden in plain view. Most people just do not do their homework.


24 posted on 04/20/2011 12:14:12 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Which of the limited and enumerated powers of Congress covers having an “anti-porn task force”.

If done at the State level this wouldn't be a problem - but not everything worth doing is worth having a Federal “task force” assigned to it.

25 posted on 04/20/2011 12:18:33 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I count myself as lucky that I have never seen that sort of argument. I really don’t know how I would respond to that.


26 posted on 04/20/2011 12:19:01 PM PDT by HushTX (QQ more, libtard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

:-))


27 posted on 04/20/2011 12:21:41 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
I don’t want to do your homework. Just go on google and look it up.

Translation: you have no idea as to what you're talking about. Docs or STFU.

28 posted on 04/20/2011 12:28:50 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

No Putz! I’m tired of doing other people’s research. Why you just sit three and do nothing but bitch. That is the reason why you do not know this because you are too lazy to verify it.

If you are too lazy to verify it, then prove me wrong or are you too lazy to do that to? I’m very surprised you do not even know this. It’s almost common sense.


29 posted on 04/20/2011 12:35:00 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Here is the no brainier research for you. Y

Look up the top names of the porn companies to get a start (From Google or Whate ever web site). Then put in that companies Profile name to read more about it. Then you will see where their company gets their money. For instance, do they have a parent company? Or are they are traded on the Stock Market?

Here is one of the Top Porn Companies Vivid Entertainment. You can read about them here. Just follow the money is all you have to remember.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ic/51/51033.html

I’m not doing anymore homework for you. If I did this for everyone that is too lazy to check it out, then I would never get anything done. Like I said if you don’t think what I’m saying is the truth, then prove me wrong.


30 posted on 04/20/2011 12:45:19 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; HushTX
I think there are two facets of the kiddie porn question on which conservatives can disagree.

First, the issue of punishment. If the law on the books for possession of kiddie porn is ten years' jail time, then if the prisoner completes his ten years, he has served his time and is entitled to be released. I have a major problem with additional, unofficial confinement based on psychological evaluations or anything else other than recidivism. Want 'em to do life without parole?? Then the American way is to change the law.

Second, my definition of child pornography is material which depicts the sexual exploitation of actual human beings below the age of consent. A novel that describes sex with children, or artwork portraying what is purported to be sex with children, are distasteful in the extreme, but if no actual child was involved, it's not child pornography.

31 posted on 04/20/2011 12:49:14 PM PDT by Notary Sojac (Birth Certificate Derangement Syndrome - have you been tested??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HushTX
Suppression of anything becomes a self perpetuating bureaucracy. Remember The Volstead Act, the War on Drugs, the demonization (and subsequent taxation thereof) of the “Evile & Wicked Weed” and the “Callous Corporations” in the tobacco industry, ad nauseam.

All are examples of how what appeared at first glance to be something we should let the Goobers in Gooberment Agencies deal with regardless of no Constitutional authority for those Goobers, or that Gooberment Agency.

Pointing out that the young are known to be inclined towards sex, and that since time immemorial, parents have had to keep an eye on their children, much less that parents are the ones charged by both God and the Constitution with raising their children - all are considered by some as secret signs of support for kiddie porn.

The ultimate offense to such people seems to be the vilest of observations, that parents and churches will be very ineffective in creating moral and self regulating behavior in comparison to laws/government. Family and church seem to be seen, by those posters, as have little efficacy in the creation of moral and self-regulating citizens of the Republic.

I have tried to explain my observations on a phenomenon that may be inexplicable. It's surely worth what you paid for it. ;-)

32 posted on 04/20/2011 12:54:08 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; little jeremiah; DJ MacWoW; trisham; metmom; TheOldLady; BykrBayb
Which of the limited and enumerated powers of Congress covers having an “anti-porn task force”.

I understand how much libertarians despise the commerce clause, but it's still there.

If done at the State level this wouldn't be a problem - but not everything worth doing is worth having a Federal “task force” assigned to it.

Now if the libertarians were to confine their beloved pornography to within the individual states this would probably work, but they don't do that now do they.

33 posted on 04/20/2011 12:57:19 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

There is a clique here on FR who seem to believe that the way to make Americans more virtuous is to pass more laws. I have a hunch they’ll be showing up here shortly.


34 posted on 04/20/2011 1:03:57 PM PDT by Notary Sojac (Birth Certificate Derangement Syndrome - have you been tested??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
It is not just those much reviled “libertarians” that despise an overly expansive reading of the commerce clause - but also anyone who is a Constitutionalist or a Conservative.
35 posted on 04/20/2011 1:04:11 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Holder finally did something right. In this day and age of trillion dollar deficits, we don’t need to waste money on task forces that duplicate the work of other divisions within the U.S. Attorney’s office, as well as similar programs at the state and local level.


36 posted on 04/20/2011 1:16:43 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

What a beautiful, peaceful scene. Thank you, TOL!


37 posted on 04/20/2011 1:35:14 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

In actual fact the established porn houses have been complaining about declining market share and profitability.

There are people who post themselves and friends performing. Very difficult to compete with free.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/04/digital-playground-video-technology-e-gang-09-ali-joone.html


38 posted on 04/20/2011 1:36:49 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

You made the charge; either back it up or withdraw it.


39 posted on 04/20/2011 1:39:06 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Thanks for posting this article.


40 posted on 04/20/2011 1:41:45 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson