Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Proposed soda tax would raise $1.7 billion statewide for schools and children's health programs
Mercury News ^ | 4/21/11 | Neil Gonzales

Posted on 04/21/2011 12:41:38 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

Sipping soda may not help your waistline. But taxing it could do wonders for schools' bottom line.

In the Peninsula and South Bay, a tax could mean more than $86 million to tackle the epidemic of childhood obesity -- a welcomed infusion of money during a time of harsh budget cuts.

A bill by Assemblyman Bill Monning, D-Carmel, would levy a tax on any beverage with added caloric sweeteners, such as soda pop, sweet teas and sports drinks. AB 669 proposes a tax of 1 cent per fluid ounce, which would raise an estimated $1.7 billion annually in California -- most of it going toward health-related programs for children.

San Mateo County would see $22.6 million, while Santa Clara County would receive $63.5 million, according to a statewide study released Thursday by the nonprofit California Center for Public Health Advocacy.

"That's a sizable amount of money," said Peter Burchyns, spokesman for the San Mateo County Office of Education.

Burchyns said it's unclear whether schools would have to use the money for a specific purpose or be able to direct it to a variety of needs.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; children; health; monning; sodatax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Uhh, No.

lots of parcel taxes around too..

No. No. No. No. .. No.

1 posted on 04/21/2011 12:41:42 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Problem,they never get the $$$!


2 posted on 04/21/2011 12:43:07 PM PDT by taxtruth (Don't end the fed,jail the fed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Chance are the Politically Correct ban on sugary drinks would take effect and much far less than 1.7 billion would be collected.

Do you imagine they took either the effect of the tax or political correctness into account when they came up with this figure?

3 posted on 04/21/2011 12:44:05 PM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

idiots


4 posted on 04/21/2011 12:44:58 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

CA schools need EDUCATION programs, not health programs.


5 posted on 04/21/2011 12:45:32 PM PDT by SZonian (July 27, 2010. Life begins anew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

(’Ve must do it to uhhh.. for ze children.. Jaa.’)

Yeah, Right. always for the children.. and the unions.


6 posted on 04/21/2011 12:46:04 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Idiots. Just can’t grasp that when you raise a tax on something, you get less of it. Won’t raise near that much, but would kill a decent number of jobs.

Again, idiots...


7 posted on 04/21/2011 12:47:54 PM PDT by piytar (Talga Vassternich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The Nanny State advances...


8 posted on 04/21/2011 12:49:51 PM PDT by American Quilter (DEFUND OBAMACARE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Every can of softdrink is already taxed 11 cents (10 cents for the ‘deposit’ which you'll never see again, and 1 cent tax on the tax, which to me is the height of hubris...) So they want to more than double the existing special taxes on a can of soda from 11 cents to 23 cents, or a little higher if they make this tax also taxable.

For a 2 liter bottle that only has 11 cents tax already, they're going to add at least 67 cents in tax atop that. And I'm sure the plan is to toss this tax on fountain served drinks as well, making that 44 ounce soda half a buck more expensive.

All to give to...schools? The place that outlaws tag, forbids running, and dumbed down every single playground? Will this bring back actual gym in schools? Nope, nope, it's for education classes... Which obviously aren't working in the first place, but if we give it a heck of a lot more money, it'll be just a-okay. Really, we won't use that money to pad our union slush funds...

The tax is stupid, the supposed benefit of the tax is useless, and maybe the answer isn't making kids sit in one place for 8 hours a day... Just a thought there. Here, have another strawberry flavored milk, with twice the carbs as a soda! It's healthy, and school approved.

9 posted on 04/21/2011 12:51:43 PM PDT by kingu (Legislators should read what they write!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
most of it going toward health-related programs for children.

More likely new cars for the legislators, or some other bennie.

10 posted on 04/21/2011 12:52:56 PM PDT by itsahoot (Almost everything I post is Sarcastic, since I have no sense of humor about lying politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

I heard that they also want to raise the CRV in California again...


11 posted on 04/21/2011 12:55:30 PM PDT by Thunder90 (Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
California, huh? Let's see them tax movie tickets to raise revenue and see if the Hollyweird elite bellyache about it; can't have their own ox gored, I'll bet.

Will they at least charge the higher tax at the refreshment counter, or will the liberal elite movie makers get an exemption for that?

12 posted on 04/21/2011 12:55:31 PM PDT by jeffc (Prayer. It's freedom of speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
If a 2-liter bottle of Coke sells for $1.49, as it often does:

A penny tax on each of the 68 ounces would raise the price by 46%. A penny tax on cheaper, non-name brands, would do even more damage. You can often find a 99 cent special on those. Adding 68 cents would increase the price by 68%. For the children.

13 posted on 04/21/2011 12:55:53 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (Note to Obama: The only time you actually are the smartest person in the room is when you are alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If you think that the kids and health care will get the money, I have a bridge for sale. Never trust a politician to do what he says he’s gonna do. The NYS thruway was only supposed to be a toll road until the construction was paid off. RIGHT.


14 posted on 04/21/2011 12:56:11 PM PDT by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton, Paradise Lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I know a great way around the law once it is enacted. I’m gonna be rich!!!


15 posted on 04/21/2011 12:57:28 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (President Obama's approval ratings are so low now, Kenyans are accusing him of being born in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

To the nitwit who wrote this dreck: All taxes go into the General Fund from which all is spent on meaningless liberal feel-good projects which are worthless. Schools and children’s health programs will NEVER see a dime of that money, and you can BANK on it stupid!


16 posted on 04/21/2011 1:02:35 PM PDT by Doc Savage ("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Yeah! You’re probably going to sell your soda by weight.


17 posted on 04/21/2011 1:10:40 PM PDT by Ed Condon (Give 'em a heading, an altitude, and a reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
CA: Proposed soda tax would raise $1.7 billion statewide for schools and children's health programs

I you ban sodas or people stop drinking them, what good is it?.....

18 posted on 04/21/2011 1:21:46 PM PDT by Red Badger (Mitt Romney: The Harold Stassen of the 21st century........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage; ez; itsahoot; NormsRevenge
Right you all are: "Burchyns said it's unclear whether schools would have to use the money for a specific purpose or be able to direct it to a variety of needs."

The answer will announce itself soon enough...

19 posted on 04/21/2011 1:28:53 PM PDT by Tenniel2 (Ignore politics and you'll end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
No, the money will go to a new bureaucracy to regulate, collect and report the taxes. Maybe a slim .0025% will go to the intended source. The rest will go to the deficit.

IT'S OVER CALI!

20 posted on 04/21/2011 1:35:01 PM PDT by poobear (FACTS - the turd in the punch bowl of liberal thought!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson