ohhhhhh so an alphabetized computer list is ‘proof’ now?
I’ll use that next time i need a drivers license or passport...
Hawaii LONG form sent march 2011...
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/10/hawaii-official-and-ex-official-lie-to-cover-their-tracks/
I still think that he was born in Hawaii and that this is a non-issue. I believe that he lied on his college application and said he was a foreigner to get financial aid and that this is the scandal.
Is the AP involved in the coverup as well? The more I look at the BC issue the more I see a losing battle. We can beat BO on issues...I just can’t imagine he has 100’s of people and new agencies involved in a cover up. I’m OUT as a birther..I’m IN on the issues. Phew, I should sleep much better now...this birther stuff ways running my life.
More blah, blah, blah from the Obama luvin' msm. But they slipped up mentioning "birth records", as in plural, as in more than just a "one-page document" that they are claiming he has.
So Tell me! was his father an American citizen?
Even if Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama had been birthed in the Lincoln Bedroom of the White House he is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
“Many of the skeptics suggest he was actually born in Kenya, his father’s home country, or Indonesia where he spent a few years of his childhood.”
Absolutely amazing “journalistic” carelessness.
1) If his dad’s “home country” (to which he returned before becoming naturalized which would have been AFTER O’s birth) is Kenya, O is not natural born.
2) Even if a Kenyan father could possibly be perceived as inconsequential, what’s with the “African” designation as “Race” on the White House posted birth certificate? No such designation exists among possible choices on a Hawaaian birth registration form—in 1961 or since. How does that unavailable choice appear on the “official” birth certificate?
But there’s nothing to see here, AP; move on.
Someone has already researched this whole index issue and it didn’t come out lilywhite from what I remember.
You can bet the Liberal RINO GOP and the Liberal RINO Talk/News Media in the tank for Obama...will use this as proof
All it proves is that Barack Hussein Obama has a Long Form Birth Certificate....and needs to be released
Anyone preventing access to it, or attacking Birthers, is helping Obama
Barak H. Obama wasn’t in the index files back in early 2008. Once he was Democratic candidate Obama things changed. It is from the index files that the computer-generated listing originates.
I’m sure you can bring truth to this author’s audacious claims.
Conservatives fail to analyze what Obi gains. He has calculated.
I guess that his calculations are:
1. Resources spent on the BC are not available for other issues. So long as attention and money go for the birth certificate, they reduce attention on healthcare insurance and tax reform. Obi counts this as a plus.
2. Obi calculates that no matter what he releases will be attacked as fraudulent. Whatever the chain of custody from the “original”, it will be discounted. Every imaginable conspiracy, using the CIA and FBI, will be invoked. Obi is probably right in this calculation.
3. Obi calculates that no court, not SCOTUS, will ever rule against a sitting President as the leader of the country. SCOTUS is constrained by Art 2, Sec. 4 in the Constitution. And even in the Nixon era, as I have read, there was never a 2/3 vote for impeachment. Obi surely calculates this correctly.
4. Obi calculates that Art. IV, Sec 1—the full faith and credit paragraph in the Constitution—will assure that whatever document that Hawaii releases has to be accepted. Obi is no friend of States Rights. IMHO, court cases about this will erode states rights. Obi calculates this as a plus.
Maybe there are other benefits that Obi gains?
The only way to win on the BC issue is to make his calculations come false.
Every Supreme Court Justice, every Senator, every Representative, and even Vice President Biden is violating their oath of office by not demanding Obama prove his eligibility to be in the office of the President of the United States of America under the Constitution. I will not soon forget this, and I will not vote again for any of them who do not press this issue. They are dodging the issue by saying that there is nothing in the Constitution to provide for enforcing this provision. That's nonsense!
Call the man on it. Tell him he is subject to impeachment under that provision unless the man shows proof he is eligible. Remember this when you vote next. Perhaps if we do, we might get some patriots, some defenders of the Constitution and not just more of the same, as we we have now. Think of it this way; Would Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, John Adams, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and the like stood by and let this man thumb his nose at the people, or would they have done something. I guarantee they he wouldn't have pulled this off on those men. If he is eligible, make him prove it. Everybody else has. If you don't do anything else, vote accordingly.
And I'd like to see Stanley's birth documentation.
Parents who name a daughter Stanley have something wrong with them from the start.I think Stanley was weird AND promiscuous.
AND STANLEY....YOU DON'T DUMP YOUR KIDS ON RELATIVES AND GO OFF FOR A FEW YEARS. SELFISH, SELFISH...MOTHER LIKE SON...
School records please...
If you check the index printout in the AP picture, you will notice three things. 1. The list looks newly printed. The paper shows no sign of aging. 2. The name above Barack Obama has “duplicate” beside it. 3. There is no duplicate name listed. Normally, it would be where Obama’s name appears?
this is tremendous non-news by AP.
Some have thought that since the long form BC hasnt been shared, there are no Hawaii Dept of Health records on Obama’s birth. Not only are there such records, but they have been in there since before Aug 13th 1961...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2707790/posts?page=402#402
I remember seeing this list posted before on FR, perhaps by John Charleton or Sharon Roundeau. It was a multiple-page post. Names of children were listed in sections with corresponding dates above each section (i.e., Jan 1961-June, 1961). I specifically remember that the list with BO’s name on it was the only section with no corresponding date heading, which served to ‘debunk’ this inforamtion as being altered.
Just when you think that we’ve reached the limit of journalist stupidity....