Posted on 04/26/2011 7:16:36 PM PDT by rob88888
Would explain why he's hanging out on the nazi pelosi channel, yakin with Sgt Schultzmatthews.
Hilarious!
Notice that the Democrat hack in that video is the one bringing up the issue of US federal debt to China? Gee, how did Democrats suddenly take ownership of that issue? It’s insulting enough when Obama has been trying to keep federal spending at record levels but keeps pretending that he’s more serious than Republicans are about spending cuts. Could it be that they can get away with this because certain conservative activists are preoccupied with trying to win an argument with a left-wing idiot like Matthews over a scrap of paper? Man, this is depressing.
Naw. He laughs “with” Chrissy like he is the doddering old friend that licks rears clean. Seriously, watch again. Like the wimp that kisses hind end to make the bully in school like him. He got in a few shots, but all in all it played to Pat’s and Chrissy audience to be honest. Pat was a fool and made to look stupid. He accepted that premise to a tee in his efforts.
If these are valid charges, why didn’t Hillary Clinton’s campaign use them against Obama in 2008 instead of settling for a cabinet appointment?
You got it backwards:
USA TODAY/GALLUP POLL April 2011:
"The poll says only 38 percent of Americans are convinced Obama definitely was born in the U.S. and another 18 percent say he probably was."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=291641
Wow, I hated watching that clip. Pat Buchanan said all the right things, but Chris Matthews just mocked and laughed at him the whole time, while the sleazy Terry McAuliffe kept repeating the Dem talking point of “I think it’s great that Republicans are talking about this because it’s more votes for us!” I wish Pat had come out more strongly against Chris, but I guess he has to keep those professional relationships friendly, even as Chris all but declares him an idiot and a racist on national television.
You’re supposed to be a journalist, you know; the people’s right to know?
“No wonder he bombed Libya!!!”
It’s the old “wag-the-dog” bombing that Clintoon did during the Monica scandal. BO isn’t even original.
BTW, 9/11 truthers come up with all sorts of assertions that are supposed to prove that the attacks were an inside job. Whenever someone challenges one of their “facts”, truthers typically don’t try to refute their opponent’s point. Instead, they bring up another charge; in other words, they change the subject. For the uninitiated, it’s hard to tell whether truthers: 1) actually believe that all the circumstantial “evidence” they present could lead to any conclusion about anything or 2) they are just trying to advance the same tired Marxist agenda in another stealthy fashion. But it really doesn’t matter if some of their claims are so incredible that most people are more likely to laugh at them than spit on them. Keep that in mind.
BO doesn’t have to be original if Clinton’s tactics worked.
Good luck with that...
Unless the gobmint has a time machine stashed in area 52.
No way can get the LFBC serial number to fit in with existing date and serial numbers.....much less fake the hospital records, doctor/nurse records etc...
Paging the Nordyke Twins...pick up the white courtesy phone....
You have an appointment with history and a treason trial...
And bring your LFBC with you...thanks in advance....America.
“Journalists” are generally just irregulars working for this party or that party. Voters already know that. But that fact hasn’t given Republicans a 50 year majority, has it?
Sleazy Terry McAuliffe is doing a better job than sleazy James Carville did 13 years ago.
No, 100% - 38% - 18% = 44% who could care less.
Why does MSNBC keep Matthews? He sounds like a brain-addled, extremely rude demagogue and a totally dishonest “journalist” (if I can still use that word about him)?
He’s ruder than Bill O’Reilly and that takes some doing.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
Ghandi
Thats what we see going on here, right now they are in the laugh phase.... phase two comin up... phase three is not far off either. Phase four.... will be priceless.
So 44% do care. That’s a showstopper issue for all of them. Could any of them vote for a usurper?
So when the media says we can’t question his grades or any other records either, is that another non-issue?
Would you also say anyone who won’t go on record saying he was born here is a racist?
And then when they say we can’t question his attendance at another ‘church’ run by a racist this past Sunday is that another non-issue?
Would you also say anyone who won’t go on record saying this church is just like any other Christian church is a racist?
And when claims are made that Bill Ayers wrote Obama’s first book is that another non-issue?
Would you also say anyone who won’t go on record saying Obama wrote the book is a racist?
Where do you draw the line on the man’s character?
It’s important to know a man’s character, even if the media says it isn’t.
Do you think the Republican nominee (whoever it may be) will get a pass on these kind of questions?
Do you think the media successfully embarass and cower anyone who questions the credentials of the Republican nominee, as they have successfully done with some of us who might have questioned Obama?
That just may change this election.
Pray for America
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.