Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theodore R.; Impy

If TR had been the nominee in 1912, I postulate Wilson would’ve been defeated by an achingly close margin. How so ? Look at the California returns. Taft was not on the ballot in the general election in the state because TR secured BOTH the Progressive & Republican lines. So the race was a good indicator of what such a showdown would’ve looked like between TR and Wilson with the Socialist Eugene V. Debs performing respectably. As it was, TR won the state by nearly a tie vote, less than 200 votes, each getting 41.8%. Debs took 12% and the Prohibitionist took 3.5%.


23 posted on 05/08/2011 4:38:03 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican

I’ve played around with 1912 on Dave Leip’s atlas.

If Wilson had gotten all of Debs vote it I think it would have been hella close. But with Debs in their I think either Taft or TR would have taken it.

The pro-Wilson swings in 1916 are perplexing, many Hughes states were close. I guess he got many of those TR voters.


29 posted on 05/09/2011 8:52:11 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson