[jazusamo]

Are there any FReepers working in law that would have insight as to why the NLRB chooses to only sue two states instead of the four at this time?

Solomon's reason of it not being efficient doesn't seem logical, could there possibly be something about SC and UT that would make for a more difficult case for NLRB?

[AU72]

We don’t have an Administration, we have a Junta.

[PapaBear3625]

Are there any FReepers working in law that would have insight as to why the NLRB chooses to only sue two states instead of the four at this time?

So that if they lose, they can figure out a way to improve their approach for the other two states?

[101voodoo]

Whatever happens this will wind up in the USSC and there Obama and his union thugs will lose.

I think this is a wonderful issue for the election as it highlights the extreme connection between the unions and the Left in the country. Since the majority of Americans now see the Unions as greedy and are FOR reductions in tax payer benefits for them, the issue will be a winner for the Republicans.

[backwoods-engineer]

Obama’s NRLB is treasonous. How DARE them commies seek to thwart the states. The damnable NRLB is not even Constitutional, anyway.

[Maceman]

Are there any FReepers working in law that would have insight as to why the NLRB chooses to only sue two states instead of the four at this time?

Because it gives the NLRB a second bite at the apple if the first lawsuit doesn't go their way.

[bimboeruption]

Bye-bye Free Republic...hello, Police State.

[NonValueAdded]

The board contends the amendments violate the second provision.

That is a pretty weak foundation. I predict the NLRB gets slapped down.

[meyer]

Death to unions.

[Jacquerie]

Obama will continue to abuse and collect power until he is challenged. A tyrant, not a President.

His ministers reward supporters and punish enemies like an oriental despot.

[Condor51]

The action by the NLRB is simply political, as Obama and the Democrats could not push card check through the legislative process, said Katie Gage, executive director of the Workforce Fairness Institute, an advocacy group opposed to card check laws. ...“The Obama administration was not able to deliver, so it is using its National Labor Relations Board and any other group of unelected bureaucrats it can in time to deliver labor for the president’s reelection campaign,” Gage told CNSNews.com.

The Marxists at the NLRB are all on dope. They're trying to do an end run around Congress

1. The 'Supremacy Clause', (Article VI, clause 2) isn't pertinent nor relevant in this instance.
   
2. Neither is SCOTUS' decision in NLRB v. Nash-Finch Co.

So like Katie Gage says, this is purely Political, a payback attempt to the Unions for not getting Card Check rammed through. And the day that a bunch of unelected bureaucrats in some darkened 3rd subbasement in a building in DC start making 'their rules' - supersede the laws - is the day, 'I Go Rambo'!

Lock 'n Load.
All's ready on the firing line.

[SandRat]

[TenthAmendmentChampion]

And now we see the hill the dems have chosen to die on: unionism. Because it’s the gravy train.