Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump to China: “Listen, you (BLEEP), we’re going to tax you 25 percent”
Hotair ^ | 04/29/2011 | Allahpundit

Posted on 04/29/2011 1:13:57 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: caww; Impy; central_va; org.whodat; SeekAndFind; Huck
RE :”.....little if any idea of the rules of play...he makes his own as he goes along I think....won’t work on the Interantional stage let alone Washington.

Can't argue with that at all. But what's the difference to him?

Trump is banking on an audience that doesn't want to live in reality. They want someone to present them with an imaginary world where the fixes are easy and painless. Obama gave them that in 2008, now Trump sees a huge opening. The country is full of suckers begging to be taken each election day,

I have a Democrat friend who has been preaching Trump's Trade policy for years. He says we just never should have imported things and wants to go back to the 1970s.

Trump's Chumps!

61 posted on 04/29/2011 9:07:53 PM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience

Do you think Trump would make the best candidate and president out of the current GOP bunch?


62 posted on 04/29/2011 9:13:47 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

I believe Trump best understands the mood of the country.

Keep in mind that Reagan was a huge fan of FDR, even after he converted to Constitutional principles, because of his leadership skills.

The “professional” Republican leaders in my state are stressing the need to play to independent voters. Temper the message, if you will, to garner their support.

People are looking for a leader. If a Republican can emerge that will give a positive message on our core principles he/she will energize the electorate. Otherwise people will submit to the false security of governmental intervention.


63 posted on 04/29/2011 10:21:24 PM PDT by the_conscience (We ought to obey God, rather than men. (Acts 5:29b))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience

I think we disagree.

My opinion: Trump is, at heart, a promoter; this is your “mood” thing. Were the mood different Trump would be different, it doesn’t matter to him whatever the mood is..

He knows how to run a business and how to make money.

On economic policy, social policy and foreign policy, he is an idiot, not a clue.

On the personal level, he lacks depth, class, taste, and his value system stops with “I, me, mine.”

Other than that, we’re really close on the subject.

:)


64 posted on 04/29/2011 10:41:35 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

[grin]

Trump is a good businessman... he knows the market... better than the professional Republicans.


65 posted on 04/29/2011 11:18:25 PM PDT by the_conscience (We ought to obey God, rather than men. (Acts 5:29b))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: annelizly

In my neck of the woods that kind of language is reserved for the locker room, not public television. I do not recall Renaldus Magnus using four letter words to get his point across.


66 posted on 04/30/2011 1:13:27 AM PDT by exnavy (May the Lord bless and keep our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: warchild9
All I know is that CEO’s are the scum of the earth, and Perot was right.

Communist! /sacrasm

67 posted on 04/30/2011 3:28:27 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
Tariffs are simply a form of subsidy no different ethically or economically from something like ethanol subsidies or agricultural subsidies. If the goal of a tariff is to protect workers or an industry that cannot compete sucessfully, the resultant higher prices amount to a taking from customers.

If a foreign nation chooses to subsidize their exports and unfairly undercut our domestic industries then, as Friedman counseled, domestic customers should simply express their gratitude for the lower prices and buy the cheaper product.

68 posted on 04/30/2011 2:25:34 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Obama. Chauncey Gardiner without the homburg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: central_va

My wife has to deal with Big Pharma and clothing company CEO’s on a regular basis, and she says she feels like taking a shower afterwards.

Once, she went to a conference,where a lawyer explained to a bunch of suits how the new tax laws (2002-2003) allowed them to use taxpayers money to fund shipping manufacturing facilities to communist China. She showed me her notes from that speech. She had written over and over: TRAITOR TRAITOR TRAITOR.

She grew up in Castro’s Cuba, and ought to know.


69 posted on 04/30/2011 3:16:12 PM PDT by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Smoot Hawley did not cause the depression: Imports during 1929 were only 4.2% of the United States' GNP and exports were only 5.0%.

I am tired of the "free traitor" lies about Smoot Hawley.
Just another example of how effective the brainwashing has been

70 posted on 04/30/2011 3:21:10 PM PDT by dennisw (NZT - "works better if you're already smart")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So Allahputz is now joining the Trump-bashing?

GO DONALD!


71 posted on 04/30/2011 3:22:01 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Birther on Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Smoot Hawley happened in a situation which was the diametric opposite of our current world situation.

Back then, America had the most to lose.

We were a massive exporting powerhouse.

Hint: We’re an importing mess now. We really have no more industry to lose.

We have everything to gain from a trade war. The only real question is, what are we waiting for?


72 posted on 04/30/2011 3:24:42 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Birther on Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

lol You are hyperventilating. Trump is for real and right now he’s seeing what kind of monetary support and pledges he can expect. Seeing who calls him up. If it looks good then he runs.


73 posted on 04/30/2011 3:27:27 PM PDT by dennisw (NZT - "works better if you're already smart")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Back when Paul Volker straightened out the Jimmy Carter mess... we were a mighty exporting nation and did not run continual trade deficits. Times are so much different today. I fail to see how a nation (USA) that runs a 600 billion dollar annual trade deficit can lose a trade war. We have to produce more and consume less. We have so much “stuff” in peoples houses and garages and flea markets that I don’t think we would even notice if China sold us nothing for the next five years. We could fix and make do w what we have and make more right at home in the good ol USA


74 posted on 04/30/2011 3:34:04 PM PDT by dennisw (NZT - "works better if you're already smart")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Hint: We’re an importing mess now. We really have no more industry to lose.

Ya know and that loss of industries has cut down on a lot of our pollution and CO2 output. But of course the eco-wackos don't care and press onward with their insane money-draining schemes. Because they don't know how to produce...they just know how to harass the real producers, capitalists and workers of America

75 posted on 04/30/2011 3:38:02 PM PDT by dennisw (NZT - "works better if you're already smart")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: warchild9

Great story, thanks.


76 posted on 04/30/2011 6:22:30 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I am tired of the "free traitor" lies about Smoot Hawley.

Don't let 'em get away with it anymore. Call 'em on it.

77 posted on 04/30/2011 6:33:51 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Allegra

His “lets take the Iraqi oil” idea could win over a lot of people.

He should run for President of Candyland.


78 posted on 05/01/2011 1:16:36 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

>> If I thought he was serious about running for President I’d be worried,

I think I’m the only one that doesn’t give a # that Trump said # this and # that. Hell, it’s not like he said #UBO.


79 posted on 05/01/2011 1:19:52 AM PDT by Gene Eric (*** Jesus ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Allegra
RE :”His “lets take the Iraqi oil” idea could win over a lot of people. He should run for President of Candyland.

He has all these ‘easy’ sounding ideas that no one else thought of. Reminds me of about 2005 when FNC BoR did a rant about how ethanol would make our country energy independent 'just like Brazil', and then we wouldnt need a military, but our government just refused to make it happen. I had a few people here in Maryland who actually repeated this to me who believed it. Well they did get ethanol after that and it was a disaster, and we got stuck with toxic light bulbs too.

The nice thing Trump has by not being serious about being elected is that even if he is proved wrong he will say he won a huge victory by getting someone to disprove him, and the MSM will still give him more airtime. If would be like the MSM giving Al Sharpton center stage in 2004.

80 posted on 05/01/2011 11:54:43 AM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson