Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reaganomics Vs. Obamanomics: Facts And Figures
forbes.com ^ | 5/5/11 | Peter Ferrara

Posted on 05/13/2011 10:44:41 PM PDT by SupplySider

In February 2009 I wrote an article for The Wall Street Journal entitled “Reaganomics v Obamanomics,” which argued that the emerging outlines of President Obama’s economic policies were following in close detail exactly the opposite of President Reagan’s economic policies. As a result, I predicted that Obamanomics would have the opposite results of Reaganomics. That prediction seems to be on track.

When President Reagan entered office in 1981, he faced actually much worse economic problems than President Obama faced in 2009. Three worsening recessions starting in 1969 were about to culminate in the worst of all in 1981-1982, with unemployment soaring into double digits at a peak of 10.8%. At the same time America suffered roaring double-digit inflation, with the CPI registering at 11.3% in 1979 and 13.5% in 1980 (25% in two years). The Washington establishment at the time argued that this inflation was now endemic to the American economy, and could not be stopped, at least not without a calamitous economic collapse.

All of the above was accompanied by double digit interest rates, with the prime rate peaking at 21.5% in 1980. The poverty rate started increasing in 1978, eventually climbing by an astounding 33%, from 11.4% to 15.2%. A fall in real median family income that began in 1978 snowballed to a decline of almost 10% by 1982. In addition, from 1968 to 1982, the Dow Jones industrial average lost 70% of its real value, reflecting an overall collapse of stocks.

President Reagan campaigned on an explicitly articulated, four-point economic program to reverse this slow motion collapse of the American economy:

1. Cut tax rates to restore incentives for economic growth, which was implemented first with a reduction in the top income tax rate of 70% down to 50%, and then a 25% across-the-board reduction...

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: debt; fail; obamanomics; reagan; reaganomics; spending; tax; taxes
Great article by a former Reagan policy wonk. It explains very clearly why Reaganomics worked and Obamanomics can never work.
1 posted on 05/13/2011 10:44:46 PM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SupplySider

ping for reading in the morning


2 posted on 05/13/2011 11:09:59 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider

Great days for America!

3 posted on 05/13/2011 11:15:47 PM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider

There was a reason why the left incessantly spouted the mantra “the worst________since the Great Depression” when discussing anything related to addressing the economic downturn. That would enable them to “naturally” follow what they think “everyone” would acknowledge about FDR’s New Deal: spend your way out of it, of course. Why, it worked for us then, it follows that it is the prudent thing to do today.

Never mind that the actual facts show that FDR’s policies actually extended the Depression...it is the “history” taught in the liberal educational establishment for over half a century that will sway the masses.

Confront a liberal with the information in this article and he/she will insist that Reagan’s policies actually led to worsening debt/deficits during his tenure, that tax breaks for the wealthy were granted “on the backs of the poor”, that Keynesian economics is the way to go, etc.

You can’t fix stupid.


4 posted on 05/13/2011 11:32:37 PM PDT by Let_It_Be_So
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider
thanks,fof the post. :)

5 posted on 05/13/2011 11:36:46 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (You do not have to smear (Pharaoh / Imam) Obama w/ lies....the truth does a fine job. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider

Ping.


6 posted on 05/13/2011 11:46:39 PM PDT by Carbonsteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider

BFCR


7 posted on 05/13/2011 11:55:07 PM PDT by Loud Mime (Prayers for missing Marizela Perez. Prayers for her safe return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider
When President Reagan entered office in 1981, he faced actually much worse economic problems than President Obama faced in 2009. Three worsening recessions starting in 1969 were about to culminate in the worst of all in 1981-1982, with unemployment soaring into double digits at a peak of 10.8%. At the same time America suffered roaring double-digit inflation, with the CPI registering at 11.3% in 1979 and 13.5% in 1980 (25% in two years). The Washington establishment at the time argued that this inflation was now endemic to the American economy, and could not be stopped, at least not without a calamitous economic collapse.
Andrew Cuomo made his reputation in 1984 with a brilliant speech ridiculing the "rosy scenario" being painted by Reagan and the Republicans and predicting economic disaster if Reagan were reelected. We saw how that prediction worked out (actually, we didn't. Cuomo was praised ever after for that speech - without mentioning any specifics which in hindsight would too obviously have been claptrap).
economist John Lott has rightly said, “For the last couple of years, President Obama keeps claiming that the recession was the worst economy since the Great Depression. But this is not correct. This is the worst “recovery” since the Great Depression.”

8 posted on 05/14/2011 2:57:27 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider

Great article. Unfortunately, the liberals have a deep religious faith in government, and this faith is impervious to all evidence and experience.


9 posted on 05/14/2011 3:55:01 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider
Thanks for posting this, SupplySider. I'm not sure I agree with everything the author says (particularly about just how accurate his statement about the "25-year boom" from 1982 to 2007 is), but the general theme is right on target.

Having said that, I'd wonder just how effective some of those policies from the Reagan administration might be today -- especially in light of the fact that most tax rates are already substantially lower today than they were back then.

10 posted on 05/14/2011 5:57:53 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider

Thanks


11 posted on 05/14/2011 7:27:43 AM PDT by Gothmog (I fight for Xev)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider
A couple of good books on economics....

The End of Prosperity: How Higher Taxes Will Doom the Economy--If We Let It Happen , by Laffer, Moore, and Tanous.

....and....

Basic Economics 4th Ed: A Common Sense Guide to the Economy, by Thomas Sowell.

12 posted on 05/14/2011 7:37:47 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson