Posted on 05/14/2011 8:32:00 PM PDT by TheDingoAteMyBaby
This is a story about pictures...right?
“while boys who have been abused are sometimes considered lucky for the sexual attention.”
Reallly??? Poor saps, too young to know that victims shouldn’t walk around with a silly grin, bragging to all their friends. (who wish they could be victims too)
In spite of the countless times this is posted as a joke, I can honestly state here that this thread is useless without pics.
I’ve seen the pictures.
You aren’t missing anything.
omgosh... none of the top ten are hot... they all look boring and mousey...
click on the article... from there you can click on a link to the original with pics... these are not hot gals... they are what Freepers would call, "guilty." so i guess they are double guilty...
In before the inevitable Helen Thomas post....
I’m not clicking on the link. Thanks for the heads up.
I’ll take your (and airborne’s) word for and it and pass on clicking the link.
It used to be a good country when we could beat this garbage into a pulp and the ACLU wouldn't show up. A pedophile is a pedophile.
And so it is with phrases like this that the bars of our psychic age are constructed around us. In fact, there actually is a difference between men and women, boys and girls, and there is undeniably a difference in the sexual experience which can be broken down on gender lines.
But this view is anathema to the left which must destroy the distinctions between the sexes if it is to destroy the family, the fundamental building block of society which builds bulwarks against socialism. Destroy the family and you can destroy the resistance the resistance to socialism. Destroy the traditional role of the sexes and you can destroy the family. This is not my insight, this is the battle plan of The Frankfurt School.
One of the wisest observations ever made about the sexes has come down through the ages from the sage:
Higgamus hoggamus, woman is monogamous; higgamus piggamus, man is polygamous.
Once this undeniable scientific principle is accepted, all falls into place.
There are a lot of horny boys not much older than 14. In biblical times, the youth of that age was considered old enough to take on the responsibilities of manhood, which included supporting a wife if he wished to marry. I would not object to a liberalization of modern consent ages in accordance with the customs of old, IF that was coupled with a serious intent to marry and pull their own weight.
Most social conservatives would say that premarital teen sex is destructive to the family.
My wife and I married as teens, over 43 years ago.
Both of our parents were married until death.
faggamous pabulus, queers are fabulous
Cheers!
I include myself in that catogory. A 15 year old male having sex with a 30 year old female is no big deal. I would never vote to convict regardless of the law.
I include myself in that catogory. A 15 year old male having sex with a 30 year old female is no big deal. I would never vote to convict regardless of the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.