Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Bennett to Gingrich: You’re Shooting at [Paul Ryan] From Behind! (Testy Radio Interview)
National Review ^ | 05/17/2011 | Jim Geraghty

Posted on 05/17/2011 11:33:47 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: beaversmom

As my father, who was an electrical engineer, used to say, “too much book learning, no common sense”.


41 posted on 05/17/2011 4:08:53 PM PDT by kalee (The offences we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
He was asked if the Republicans should ignore the opposition to a measure and pass it anyway. He responded it was wrong for the Left or the Right to disregard so much opposition and make changes that people didn't understand.

Nobody objected to that part of his answer.

If expecting people to pay for the care they receive is what the public mandate is then I guess I'm for it.

That is not what the public mandate is, and that is not what Gingrich said he wants. I quote him directly in the post preceding this one. Read it, if you don't know what he said.

Say what you want about Newt ... but he is quite correct when he says something as big and monumental as changing Medicare needs to be done with the approval of those who will be affected,

In which case, his characterization of Ryan's plan as "right wing social engineering" must bother you quite a bit, because those most in favor of Ryan's plan (and they are overwhelmingly so) are seniors.

AND somehow we've got to find a way to made certain those who get medical care pay for it and don't dump the cost on the rest of us.

Good for you. That means you can't be very much in favor of Gingrich's plan, because the largest class of people, receiving by far and away the most health care they aren't paying for, are already in government programs called Medicare and Medicaid. And yerboi thinks that trying to make those programs fiscally responsible is, in his words, "radical." This despite the fact that only people under the age of 54 would actually be affected. So Gingrich thinks a proposal that would not affect anyone for TEN YEARS, during which time we can talk and debate our silly little fannies off, is "radical," "right wing social engineering."

If nothing else, consider him the dose of attenuated live virus you give a child to give them protection from the real thing later in life.

Congratulations! You have actually come as close to your mentor as anyone on any thread or program in making the stupidest comment of the week. The only people who're receiving "innoculations" from this inane boulderdash are Democrats. Between now and Judgement Day you will be hearing the attack ads like this: "The Democrats want to save Medicare. But Ryan's plan? Even Ultraconservative Newt Gingrich called it 'radical.'"

Thankfully, he's innoculated a lot of us from further considering him a serious candidate.

42 posted on 05/17/2011 4:11:47 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47. In leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: All

With all politicians trying to come up with an acceptable political solution to our perceived health care problems it is easy to forget that our problem is that the consumer is removed from the decision making process. When health care becomes market driven again then the problem will be solved. When you hear a politician refer to this you’ll know that we are finally on the road to relief.


43 posted on 05/17/2011 4:15:33 PM PDT by pokerone (Live Free or Die is more than a catchy slogan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

Granted I’m not as gifted in the intelligence field as you are, but I don’t have to resort to insults to make my points.

If you want a reasonable discussion of the situation, fine. If all you want to do is get on my case because I see something differently from you then you need to find someone else.

Thanks!


44 posted on 05/17/2011 4:21:38 PM PDT by jwparkerjr (I would rather lose with Sarah than win with a RINO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
I've actually answered all of your points, and I didn't call you any names; although I did say that you made a stupid remark. It is stupid. Newt Gingrich has laid down suppressive fire that will be used by our enemies and their willing accomplices in the collaborationist press. There is NOTHING positive about that.
45 posted on 05/17/2011 4:25:26 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47. In leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Newts acting like the kid in the class who put his hand up first and wasn’t called on. He then tries to give an even BETTER answer than everyone who was called on before him.

Now it’s recess and we are taking turns hitting him in the gut.


46 posted on 05/17/2011 5:58:26 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MontaniSemperLiberi

Newts acting like the kid in the class who put his hand up first and wasn’t called on. He then tries to give an even BETTER answer than everyone who was called on before him.

Now it’s recess and we are taking turns hitting him in the gut.


Now that was an outstanding post....perfect!


47 posted on 05/17/2011 6:03:55 PM PDT by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: MontaniSemperLiberi
If "BETTER" is the new "stupider," you are correct.

For an alleged conservative to give the kinds of answers Newt gave to several questions yesterday, I'd be more inclined to believe he'd pulled an all-nighter, fell down the steps on the way off the bus, got beat up at recess, and then was called on for an answer.

48 posted on 05/17/2011 8:48:21 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47. In leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
"tries to give an even BETTER answer" Get some sleep.
49 posted on 05/17/2011 8:58:55 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MontaniSemperLiberi

Your post makes it sound like a gang of conservative bullies is picking on Newt for an essentially well-intentioned effort . If that wasn’t your message, I’d say somnolence is your issue, not mine.


50 posted on 05/17/2011 9:18:27 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47. In leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Constitutionalists don't DO "Social Engineering." We want to draw down government, and return responsibility to individuals. That is why Gingrich's comments are sooo galling. We have over $200 Trillion in unfunded debts & entitlements coming up. This is not time to continue vague "discussions." We need to get behind a solid fiscal plan for controlling public costs NOW. The whole point of Ryan's plan is to manage massive promised entitlements and reduce them to reasonable levels before we immediately go BK. Newt's also jealous of Ryan because he offers significantly better 'optics.' Hope my husband doesn't catch me writing that... ; )
51 posted on 05/18/2011 5:29:52 AM PDT by 4Liberty (88% of Americans are NON-UNION. We value honest, peaceful Free trade-NOT protectionist CARTELS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Newt is what happens when you keep trading wives and the current one is not very smart.


52 posted on 05/18/2011 10:10:59 AM PDT by juliej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Oh my. The man is in need of help. After his personal life, sitting on the couch with Pelosi, and Scozzafava (sic?) and now this...


53 posted on 05/21/2011 4:05:21 AM PDT by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
Bennett reminded me all morning of a father with a daughter that's dating someone he doesn't care for and regardless of what his daughter says about her date or how the kid comes across it pretty clear dad's not going to be happy.

It honestly sounded to me like Bill Bennett is backing Rick Santorum or Paul Ryan and his beef with Newt was that he felt Newt wasn't giving them the respect Bennett gives them.

I'll commend you for figuring out early on that so much of the "conservative" media was in the tank for a specific candidate and, no different from the liberal media, trying to give the candidates they didn't like a hard time while pretending to be "objective." We didn't know at the time that Bennett was for Romney, but it certainly became clear when he went on to talk down Santorum and so many of his fellow RINO radio hosts like Hewitt and Medved became even more enthusiastic Romney spokespeople.

54 posted on 05/13/2012 5:54:04 PM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson