Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Nearly Aborted President
The American Thinker ^ | 18 May 2011 | Peter Heck

Posted on 05/18/2011 12:25:34 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss

There's an old African proverb that says, "Who knows whose womb carries the chief?" This simple truth has taken on a powerful meaning recently for every American paying attention.

According to recently secured documents from the Immigration and Naturalization Services, evidence has emerged that President Obama's father, Barack Obama, Sr., apparently paid to send a young Kenyan girl he had impregnated in Massachusetts to London to have an abortion.

Doing the work that investigative journalists of the mainstream media used to do, author Jack Cashill reveals that the foreign press, unlike their American counterparts, are all over the story. Far from speculation, according to the INS documents, the high school aged girl was in Massachusetts on an exchange program when she evidently became pregnant by the 29 year old Obama. Asian News International notes that this incident occurred prior to 1973's Roe v. Wade decision, meaning, "abortions were illegal in the U.S."

One cannot help but wonder if such a revelation would not cause a man whose own wife describes the heinous butchery of partial-birth abortion as a "legitimate medical procedure" to consider: that could have easily been me.

Let me pause to acknowledge that I don't typically like using these kinds of tactics when discussing the issue of abortion. The truth is it doesn't matter whether the child being killed is the next Beethoven, Bach, Edison, or Einstein. What makes human life valuable and worthy of protection is that it is human life, bearing the inviolable image of the Creator. Life is valuable because of what it is, not what it does -- whether that's making beautiful music or being tone deaf, inventing a light bulb and unlocking spectacular scientific mysteries or needing help tying shoelaces...or yes, leading the most powerful nation in world history.

But this unfolding bombshell regarding Barack Obama's family is highly instructive given our President's lifelong commitment to defending abortion. The simplest scenario arising from the story is this: President Obama had a half-brother or half-sister who, rather than having the chance to thrive and succeed as he has, ended up in a dumpster in London. The more complex reality for the president to grapple with is that it is not that far of a stretch to assume, given the complexities of his relationship with mother Ann Dunham, that Barack Obama, Sr. might have preferred the same end for our current president.

Such a scenario, beyond offering a brand new perspective on Obama's memoir Dreams from my Father, would provide the most pro-abortion president our country has ever known with the same chilling realization that so many of us born after the disastrous Roe decision encounter: had it not been for the strength and resolve of loving, pro-life mothers, we could have been legally slaughtered.

It was former President Ronald Reagan who is credited with having stated the obvious but enlightening fact that those fighting for abortion rights are those who have already been born. This disquieting account about his father allows our current President the chance to put himself where his half-brother or half-sister once was...where he once was...and reconsider his tragic position on life in the womb.

As I read the heartbreaking details of this story about a soul deprived of its unalienable right to breathe free, I'm taken back to President Obama's response to Rick Warren at the Saddleback Church presidential forum in the lead-up to the 2008 election. Asked when a baby gets human rights, Obama cowardly surrendered righteousness for convenience and politics, infamously asserting that "answering that question with specificity is above my pay grade."

That embarrassing response shouldn't have been a surprise given that just a few months prior, Barack Obama addressed the issue of sex education on the campaign trail. Speaking specifically about his own daughters, the man who could have been aborted himself proclaimed, "I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby."

Like father, like son.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; naturalborncitizen
Here's a theory for ya:

The two Marxist train wrecks Barack Sr. and 17-year old college freshman Stanley Ann Dunham do a drunken hookup in the fall of 1960 and produce baby Barry.

Barack Sr. agrees to marry SAD in Feb 1961 in order to legitimize the baby.

Then he finds out SAD has also been getting her groove on with fellow Marxist and amateur pornographer Frank Marshall Davis. So Barack Sr. tells SAD to go get an abortion, just like he did with the other girl, and that if she doesn't get an abortion, he is not going to have anything more to do with her and will not recognize the baby as his. Her Marxist parents also think she should get an abortion.

Instead, the headstrong SAD decides to have the baby anyway, and scrapes together enough cash to buy a plane ticket back to Seattle where she hunkers down with her high school friends. When the time comes to give birth, for some reason she ends up across the border in Canada, perhaps in a home for unwed mothers or as an indigent in a local hospital.

She stays on in Seattle after giving birth to be among her high school friends and attend college there.

When Toot finds out SAD went ahead and gave birth, she submits an affidavit of home birth in Honolulu in order to make sure that there is no problem with the baby being a foreign citizen. Toot sends SAD money periodically in Seattle to let her scrape by at college.

SAD pleads with Barack Sr. to take her back and he ignores her. He leaves for Harvard while she is still living in Seattle.

Eventually, SAD gives up on the idea of Barack Sr. getting together with her and the baby. She divorces him but does not bother to seek child support, since she knows he will not concede the baby is his. In his INS documents, Barack Sr. does not list the child Barry as one of his children.

Many years later, Barack Jr. thinks the affidavit of home birth submitted by Toot will raise more questions than it will answer, so his allies in Hawaii "fix" the problem for him by coming up with a regular birth certificate.

1 posted on 05/18/2011 12:25:37 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss

2 posted on 05/18/2011 12:27:47 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss

You’d think the Bummer would appreciate this and call for an end to abortion. (*crickets*)


3 posted on 05/18/2011 12:28:48 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss

I like the way you think.


4 posted on 05/18/2011 12:29:11 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss
"I don't want them punished with a baby."


5 posted on 05/18/2011 12:37:45 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Obama can't see something pure like the truth without wanting to abort it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss
Are your parents Pro-Choice? I guess you got lucky!

Is your spouse? Is your doctor?

6 posted on 05/18/2011 1:06:30 AM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss

The connection with Frank Davis is speculative, but otherwise I like this theory, as it neatly accounts for quite a few of the available facts in this case without resorting to implausible details (e.g., a very expensive, time-consuming and dangerous trip to Kenya by a pregnant woman and equally expensive, time-consuming and dangerous trip back to HI by that same mother and her newborn).

It provides a reasonable self-contained account that fits the motivations/likely behavior of all the principals involved, i.e., there’s numerous indications Senior didn’t care at all about this newborn, that the relationship dissolved pretty quickly, and this new evidence about his willingness to rely on abortion to fix his “mistakes”; Stanley was pretty headstrong and independent, etc.

It also deals with the more puzzling aspects, i.e., Stanley seems to have disappeared in spring/summer 1961 (no first-hand accounts of seeing her pregnant), a friend who reports her being in Seattle already by late August, SAD’s having registered for fall UW classes sometime in August IIRC.


7 posted on 05/18/2011 3:37:35 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss

bttt


8 posted on 05/18/2011 5:31:07 AM PDT by jch10 (Cry havoc, and let slip the dogs of war...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss

interesting theory...

I’m certain that what zero presented as his BC has been either altered or just completely made up - reason is that nothing on it was worth hiding and fighting by lawyers.

The man has overwhelming contempt for us.


9 posted on 05/18/2011 8:02:07 AM PDT by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria
"...reason is that nothing on it was worth hiding and fighting by lawyers."

This is the best observation of all postings and is what puzzles me no end. If, for the moment, we grudgingly accept the LFBC as legit, there is nothing there to justify all the legal expenses. What was the point of delaying its release? What possible scenarios are we left to conclude from all this?:

a. The legal fees were actually vastly over-inflated, making all this meaningless?
b. He was forced to release a legit LFBC, and the delay in releasing it was due to either ignorance, or he was purposely toying with everyone?
c. He was forced to release a legit LFBC; but there IS something wrong with the data but nobody can connect the dots?
d. It's a forgery to cover God knows what?

I'm rather partial to (d) myself. It seems to be the only logical conclusion. Furthermore, I think the pixel-size issue needs serious scutiny, as it offers the best evidence of tampering.

10 posted on 05/18/2011 8:57:49 AM PDT by CanaGuy (Go Harper! We still love you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss

is it factual that Obama Jr was not listed as an offspring to Obama Sr?


11 posted on 05/18/2011 12:35:15 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Yep, true fact.

Here are the INS docs:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/54015762/Barack-Hussein-Obama-Sr-Immigration-File

See page 27. He lists Roy by his first wife but not little Barry by SAD.


12 posted on 05/18/2011 2:13:58 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CanaGuy

a. We don’t actually know how much of the money Ubama spent for lawyers was actually allocated to the BC issue, and he’s not about to tell us.

b. Ubama is not ignorant of anything (at least on this issue), and while he may be toying with us, there’s unquestionably plenty of stuff in his background that he IS hiding.

c. Trump and Corsi forced him to release something. I don’t know for certain if it’s legit or not, but there seems to be a sudden disinclination to connect the dots, especially amongst the “let’s move on” FReeper crowd. That bothers me.

d. There are so many problems with the LFBC at the pixel level, forgery is a definite possibility. Until someone shows me how those problems could have happened as an innocent byproduct of converting the scanned image to pdf format, I have no choice but to lean towards the forgery explanation.

Forgery of a government document has to be a felony at some level. While I realize that Ubama and his cronies will never stand trial for this crime, I don’t see that as an valid excuse to sweep it under the rug.


13 posted on 05/18/2011 3:12:50 PM PDT by Fresh Wind ('People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook.' Richard M. Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss
Here's a theory for ya:

The two Marxist train wrecks Barack Sr. and 17-year old college freshman Stanley Ann Dunham do a drunken hookup in the fall of 1960 and produce baby Barry.

Barack Sr. agrees to marry SAD in Feb 1961 in order to legitimize the baby.

Then he finds out SAD has also been getting her groove on with fellow Marxist and amateur pornographer Frank Marshall Davis. So Barack Sr. tells SAD to go get an abortion, just like he did with the other girl, and that if she doesn't get an abortion, he is not going to have anything more to do with her and will not recognize the baby as his. Her Marxist parents also think she should get an abortion.

Instead, the headstrong SAD decides to have the baby anyway, and scrapes together enough cash to buy a plane ticket back to Seattle where she hunkers down with her high school friends. When the time comes to give birth, for some reason she ends up across the border in Canada, perhaps in a home for unwed mothers or as an indigent in a local hospital.

She stays on in Seattle after giving birth to be among her high school friends and attend college there.

When Toot finds out SAD went ahead and gave birth, she submits an affidavit of home birth in Honolulu in order to make sure that there is no problem with the baby being a foreign citizen. Toot sends SAD money periodically in Seattle to let her scrape by at college.

SAD pleads with Barack Sr. to take her back and he ignores her. He leaves for Harvard while she is still living in Seattle.

Eventually, SAD gives up on the idea of Barack Sr. getting together with her and the baby. She divorces him but does not bother to seek child support, since she knows he will not concede the baby is his. In his INS documents, Barack Sr. does not list the child Barry as one of his children.

Many years later, Barack Jr. thinks the affidavit of home birth submitted by Toot will raise more questions than it will answer, so his allies in Hawaii "fix" the problem for him by coming up with a regular birth certificate.

This is pretty close to my theory, but I see a few points differently. The fact that Madelyn Dunham (grandmother) never told any of her co-workers that she had a grandson indicates she was ashamed of the fact, and most likely the shame was the result of the child being half black.

I believe Madelyn sent her away (as was the custom in those days with girls who brought shame to the family) to live with a relative in Washington state. I have found out from reading enough material that Stanley Ann had an Aunt living in Washington, and according to Radaris that aunt lived in Blaine Washington.

Blaine is a sister city with White Rock British Columbia in Canada. The south Border of White Rock is the North border of Blaine. Now get this. Blaine didn't have a hospital in 1961! The closest one was just over the border in Canada, and on top of everything else, it was FREE!

Now Freeper "Beckwith" says he has a letter from an indignant niece of Aunt Eleanor, claiming that Aunt Eleanor NEVER lived in Blaine. I have asked him to provide more details, but as of yet he has not. It is unquestionable that Aunt Eleanor B. Birkebele lived in Washington State. Radaris lists her as having lived at two separate addresses in Blaine Washington. A couple of links for you.

http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=34618044

http://radaris.com/p/Eleanor/Berkebile/

The fact that Stanley Ann showed up at her friends house around August 25th, 1961, seemingly not knowing how to change a diaper, is further indication that she had been in the region when she had her baby.

Another link if you want it. (To the Susan Blake interview.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=advfrQEeIBY&feature=player_embedded

Another difference is I think the father is Frank Davis, not Barack Obama Sr.

14 posted on 06/29/2011 9:34:11 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Obama hides behind the Grass Skirts of Hawaiian Bureaucrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson