The worlds on fire and this and gay marriage is important
Even by liberal standards, this is insane because it falls under the alleged “penumbra” of privacy that Roe v Wade is based on.
Or is that the purpose? They pass this and then it is fought on the grounds that it is unconstitutional for the same reason that makes abortion legal.
Are you saying there are breeders in SaFo City? Who knew?
Anything involving the penis is the highest issue in San Francisco.
....so you can smoke pot, marry your boyfriend, walk down the street naked, ignore Obamacare, light “St Obama” candles -
But you can’t circumcise, smoke a cigarette, carry a “Palin for President” sign....
And they say America is in decline. I say they’re not paying their fair share. :)
/sarc(???)
I’m not sure why women should be allowed to determine this matter
No Jews allowed!
With no religious exemptions, this law would clearly be unconstitutional.
Hey, buddy. I got a tip for yah.
Have ‘m take a little off the top.
Establishing health laws restricting the anal gymnastics practiced by the @$$ pirates overrunning Pelosi World..well that would be an invasion of privacy and so unenlightened and politically incorrect. Harumph. But lets save those foreskins girls.
And, in case anyone has questions about “why” this is an issue specifically to San Fagcisco... well.... I just can’t go there without puking...
Circumcision has been shown to prevent HIV transmission during HETEROSEXUAL sex. It has been shown to NOT have the same protective effect during HOMOSEXUAL sex.
NOW do you understand why they want to outlaw it in SF and why they tried the same thing in Gay-Marriage-Massachusetts?
Homosexuals hate it when heterosexuals have an advantage over them, like, you know, procreation.
Gee whiz, being a queer must be next.
I thought it must have something to do with those tights.
I swear, every sane soul should leave that toilet behind.
It looks like Schofield found 7,700 other pricks in San Francisco to oppose male circumcision. It figures. He’s probably a cross-dressing male impersonator who wishes he had the right tools. Or he is a liberal Democrat? Am I being repdundant?
This is going to be a big waste of time and money to put this on the ballot. If it does pass, it’s going to be about a microsecond before it’s challenged by conservative Jewish groups. And if they win their challenge, then I don’t see how the courts can prevent individual parents from requesting the same procedure.
For the record, we did not have our boys circumcised. But it should be a family decision.
Is it just me or are some people hardcore drugees who are too stoned or high to think straight about what laws to propose? This is about as logical as the idea that tobacco be illegal while pot be legal