Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Recount – Day 21 (all but done)
Hotair ^ | 05/19/2011 | Steve Eggleston

Posted on 05/19/2011 1:14:13 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

As I type, Waukesha County is working on the process of certifying its results after finishing the physical recount about 2 pm yesterday. With unofficial numbers from all of Waukesha County except the city of Muskego, most of the city of Waukesha, and most of the village of Summit (the last was reported to the Government Accountability Board but was still under review as of this morning) available from the GAB as of this morning, and certified numbers from the other 71 counties, 3,545 of Wisconsin’s 3,602 reporting units have been reported and at minimum reviewed by the Government Accountability Board, representing 1,477,284 of an original 1,498,880 votes. On a net basis, Justice David Prosser gained 368 votes over his pre-recount total in those 3,545 reporting units, challenger JoAnne Kloppenburg gained a net 678 votes over the pre-recount total, and an additional 162 “scattering” were recorded over the pre-recount total. That means Prosser lost 310 votes of his pre-recount 7,316-vote lead, and has an unofficial 7,006-vote lead.

Waukesha County is expected to finish the process of certification either today or tomorrow. Indeed, just before the board of canvassers broke for lunch, they completed the final canvass of Muskego. Once the certified results are transmitted to the GAB (note; if they’re transmitted electronically, they’ll be on the GAB county-by-county certified results/recount minutes page in short order), the 5-business-day window of opportunity to file a judicial appeal of the recount begins. If Kloppenburg, as the sole losing candidate, does not, do so, it will be Humpbot Time as Prosser is declared the official winner.

Since my last update on Monday, Kloppenburg penned an op-ed in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel where she denied having made up her mind on whether to challenge the inevitable recount defeat in court, then proceeded to spend the remainder of the op-ed outlining why many, including both myself and the majority of the Journal Sentinel editorial board, believe she has already made up her mind to do so.

The Associated Press, in their Wednesday wrap (copy courtesy the Appleton Post-Crescent), decided to focus on the raw recounted numbers, without any perspective on either what the pre-recount numbers were in the same reporting units or what the change of margin has been, to repeat its Election Night “mistake” of giving Kloppenburg and her entourage false hope. For those who were tracking their numbers in the days following the election, they waited for several days after the failure to report the results of the city of Brookfield became common knowledge to correct their erroneous numbers.

This post was promoted from GreenRoom to HotAir.com.
To see the comments on the original post, look here.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: elections; klopflop; kloppenburg; prosser; recount; supremecourt; wisconsin; wisconsinshowdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 05/19/2011 1:14:17 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

That’s right, Kloppenburg—keep wasting the taxpayers’ money. They’re not paying attention. /sarc


2 posted on 05/19/2011 1:17:59 PM PDT by American Quilter (DEFUND OBAMACARE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

whatta waste of money.


3 posted on 05/19/2011 1:18:51 PM PDT by ken21 (liberal + rino progressive media hate palin, bachman, cain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Time for Walker to lobby for "right to work" legislation.. for ALL of Wisconsin...
You know .... to give the democrats something else to obsess on..

The Unions heads will explode.. most workers in Wisconsin are NOT members of a Union..

4 posted on 05/19/2011 1:20:51 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Excellent strategy. After all, Obama can offer to give away Israel to its enemies in the Middle East just to take the voters attention away from the stinking economy and punishing gas prices. The Leftist media won’t be enabling Gov. Walker, though, as they slavishly do for BO.


5 posted on 05/19/2011 1:26:18 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There must be some advantage for the union punks and their dim allies in delaying the seating of Prosser. Anyone in the know care to explain?


6 posted on 05/19/2011 1:28:38 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Poor ugly broad...if only she hadn’t LOST, she might have WON!!! And that will be the basis for the recount challenge—that damned Republican clerk cost her the election, cause Democrats didn’t know soon enough how many phony votes they’d have to invent!!!


7 posted on 05/19/2011 1:31:33 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

If they can delay the (re)seating of Prosser on Aug. 1 the WI supreme court will be 3-3. When Walker’s budget repair bill is heard by the supreme count - the session starts on Aug. 1 - there will be a tie and the bill will be bumped back to the liberal Dane county appellate court.

This is their only goal, kill the legally enacted bill.


8 posted on 05/19/2011 1:38:12 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

It figgers. Is that possible under WI law?


9 posted on 05/19/2011 1:43:04 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Unfortunately yes.


10 posted on 05/19/2011 1:44:34 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ken21

Just wait until she takes it to the courts. She’s not done yet.


11 posted on 05/19/2011 1:44:39 PM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
It seems the "law" can always be gamed to suit the liberal agenda.

I have no confidence in the system anymore.

12 posted on 05/19/2011 1:47:02 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: saganite

The GAB appears to be less than sympathetic to Witchiepoo. This should bode poorly for any meaningful court challenge.


13 posted on 05/19/2011 1:49:41 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
That means Prosser lost 310 votes of his pre-recount 7,316-vote lead, and has an unofficial 7,006-vote lead.

Those 310 extra votes would have insured Prosser loss if the original reported numbers were correct.

14 posted on 05/19/2011 2:16:11 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Photobucket

15 posted on 05/19/2011 2:29:28 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

>>It figgers. Is that possible under WI law?<<

Yes, it’s possible, but it’s much more likely that a new bill will be passed in the next month or so to replace the one tied up in court. Besides, the first bill was written so hastily that it needs some redrafting anyway. Otherwise the legal bills for figuring it all out are going to be humungous.

For example, lawyers are even arguing over whether school districts are subject to major provisions of the law. Clearly(?) they were meant to be, but it appears that the drafting failed to make that the case. People are assuming that a redrafted bill will clarify that, and probably a lot of other issues.

In short, everyone, including the unions, is assuming that this law is going to take effect fairly soon, simply by passing a new bill that moots the court case tying up the old bill.


16 posted on 05/19/2011 3:26:23 PM PDT by Norseman (Term Limits: 8 years is enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
what a miserable wretch...
17 posted on 05/19/2011 3:42:29 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I almost hope that Kloppencommie does take the results to court. It would seal the Wisconsin democRATS’ fate.


18 posted on 05/19/2011 4:10:15 PM PDT by fwdude (Prosser wins, Goonions lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
I have no confidence in the system anymore.

No confidence is right. We are living in a land that the Courts make laws and if they cannot get their way they will tie the system up. Walker, after this recount is up, declare Prosser the winner and seat him. The hell with the courts. American Courts are garbage.

19 posted on 05/19/2011 4:38:40 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Norseman
Yes, it’s possible, but it’s much more likely that a new bill will be passed in the next month or so to replace the one tied up in court

If that's the case, will the WI democrats fleabag off to IL again?

20 posted on 05/19/2011 5:06:35 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (FUBO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson