Note; I know a couple of you were not with these dolts thinking this woman was of upstanding character, but there were so many posts, I just grabbed the names and put them in this to Line...sorry this is only directlyed at those that were flaming me for saying we don’t know enough yet to determine if he or she is lying.
First go read this.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2742478/posts?page=44
Then comeback and read everyone of your stupid comments in this thread. And reverse it to yourself.
Oh how I love being right. Next time please don’t jump to conclusions especially with serious crimes such as this.
I did make a disparaging remark about John Kerry, but I think that was it.
I haven’t read the thread or article, rather other information from the web. Regardless of the credibility of the woman flooding the media...I do believe Strauss is guilty of the sexual attack he’s going to walk away from.
The media frenzy about her is no different than about him...until this goes to court both sides will be pitting each other against each other...and the credibility of those involved. It’s show time now....
IMO and bottom line... Strauss did the deed and as usual power and influence will end this...she’ll be paid off NOT to this to trial.
You are still not right.
The case is still full steam ahead and all of the evidence is still valid.
We already knew Kahn had lied four different ways. All this is showing is that the maid has some questionable things that have happened outside of the rape.
You are boasting WAY too early. But I enjoy the chuckle.
This story is sourced entirely by people close to the defense. It looks like the defense has mounted a media Blitzkreig, timed to coincide with the long holiday week-end, and it looks like it’s working. Well, nobody ever said DSK’s lawyers were stupid.
OK... I’ll cop a plea to being delighted to see a French socialist head of the IMF getting hung up by his ‘nads.
But I still say that 90% of what we are hearing this weekend is a carefully choreographed and timed media blitz by the defense. We’ll see how it all plays out in the end.
Well, here is what i posted at #145.
I have been very suspicious of this whole story from the beginning. I can’t help wondering if this guy — jerk that he is — got set up.
But why? Perhaps he refused to go along with the Obama/Soros plan to bring down the West. I notice that he replacement at the IMF is an American.
Maybe the guy’s penchant for skirt chasing gave them the perfect set-up.
(((
I don’t know if I posted anything else, as I really don’t feel like searching.