Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin 48.5%, Obama 48% in Ohio (Palin 51-49% W/ Assumptions)
pollinsider.com ^ | 5-24-2011 | Poll Insider

Posted on 05/24/2011 2:23:45 PM PDT by WatchYourself

Public Policy Pollings magic is back to work again. A new Ohio poll, featuring an important swing state that Obama narrowly won in 2008, is up this week. Like most other PPP polls, Democrats are the overwhelming respondents in this poll. How bad? Lets take a look: The PPP poll had a respondent makeup of 45% Democrat, 35% Republican, 20 Independent, giving the Democrats a +10 Net Advantage over Republicans. In 2010, the Ohio turnout was 36% Republican, 36% Democrat, 28% Independent. So, no difference. The 45% Democrat sample even overdoes Democrat heavy 2008 by 6 points, where still only 39% of the Ohio electorate were Democrats. Its a near impossibility that 45% of the 2010 voting electorate will be Democrats in Ohio if it wasn’t even that close in 2009, as this poll shows.

What does PPP President Dean Debnam say about these results? “These Ohio numbers epitomize Barack Obama’s status right now- he’s not terribly popular but the Republican field is even more unpopular and because of that he’d be in a solid shape for reelection if we had to vote today. If a GOP candidate really captures the attention of the voters Obama will be in trouble but that is far from inevitable.” Ok, sure, if 45% of the electorate is Democrats….

PPP Reports a 10 Point Victory for Obama against Palin if the election were held today. Gosh, I wonder if a 10 point victory has anything to do with a 10 point artificial inflation of Democrats? Doing the work no media analysts will do, we re-run the numbers here and let you decide what is most accurate.

PPP Data: Obama 50%, Palin 40% (Unweighted poll, uses Dem sample 10 point higher than 2010 total and 6 points higher than 2008 total.)

Poll Insider Base Analysis: Obama 46%, Palin 43.5% – Here we see a statistical dead heat. We rework the the PPP numbers showing the makeup of the 2010 electorate of 36% Democrats, 36% Republicans, and 28% Independents. It is safe to assume that the 2012 electorate will be much closer to the 2010 one than to the 2008 one now that Obama has a (fairly unpopular) record in the state. Sarah Palin actually tops Obama slightly in Independents by 1% and even gets 1% more Democrats than Obama gets Republicans.

Poll Insider Analysis Level 2: Palin 48.5%, Obama 48% – This level I consider the best indicator on a statistical level as it includes all GOP and Dems and leaves out undecided Independents. Still a close race, but now Palin moves ahead. The reason Palin still trails in the first poll is that 14% of Republicans are undecided compared to just 5% of Democrats, these are allotted in similar fashion as the rest of the voting bases for each candidate. Challnger party high undecided rate is very common when testing an incumbent vs. a multitude of potential challengers, and the challengers usually trail in the undecided column. Why? In this case Republican voters often have a candidate in their minds to go up against the incumbent. Oftentimes they answer undecided when their candidate is not the one mentioned because at the time they don’t want to imagine that person as the candidate, even though they are likely to vote for them should they become the nominee. The incumbent’s party usually has low undecideds as they know who the candidate will be and there is no other horse in the race.

Poll Insider Analysis Level 3: Palin 51%, Obama 49%. Of the remaining 15% Undecided Independents, we allotted 9% to Palin and 6% to Obama, giving the break 3-2 to the challenger. We arrive at this rate knowing that Undecided Independents usually vote for the incumbents by similar (or greater) margins; Ohio Independents favored Republican Senate candidate Portman by almost 40% points over his Democrat challenger and favored now Governor Kasich by 16% over the Democrat incumbent.

4 scenarios, 3 of which show a reasonably close race, the other is PPP. I analyze, you decide. This is a good sign for Palin as she will have a much better opportunity to change minds in her favor than Obama will. If Palin’s numbers are this strong with the media coverage she has gotten, Ohio might not even be a toss-up a year from now.

Other tidbits from the poll:

Favorability among Conservatives: Palin Favorables among the “very Conservative” is at a solid 76% for a +62% favorable measure. She is +18% among “somewhat conservative” voters and falls off considerably from there with more liberal voters, not surprisingly. Gingrich meanwhile is at a softer (but surprisingly high) +32% among very conservative voters but at -9% among somewhat conservative voters. Romney knocks in +27% in the very important and active “very conservative group” which is 60% lower than Palin’s support. But he rebounds with somewhat conservative voters at +31% and does best in favorables among liberal voters.

Favorability among Republicans: Hey, remember all those media stories about how Palin is falling from GOP stardom? Well, turns out she remain the top Republican of the 3 main challengers. While Gingrich has a pitiful +9 standing among Republicans and Romney is at a pretty decent +30, Palin leads the pack among the Republican field at +36% favorability.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 2012; obama; ohio; palin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: LS

Troll.

(sorry LS I could resist)


21 posted on 05/24/2011 3:52:30 PM PDT by tatown (Obama is a turd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tatown

LOL.


22 posted on 05/24/2011 3:58:13 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Digger

i think WI and MI will also be in play.


23 posted on 05/24/2011 4:02:41 PM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WatchYourself

I don’t care if Palin polls 30 points below Obama, run Sarah run. Run and call the sumbitch out every step of the way, we know you are the only one we can trust to do that. Run on principle. And if you lose come back in 2016 for the win.

Palin 2012.


24 posted on 05/24/2011 4:27:51 PM PDT by toddausauras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Palin will NOT run for POTUS.

I say this with neither glee nor sadness, but merely as a reality. The reasons are clear.

1. Sarah Palin has always put her family first. She recognizes that running for President has become a grueling, brutal, 24/7 process of speeches, travels, fund-raising, debates, and meetings. It is no fun. She will not put her family through this.

2. I think Palin would love to win the election, as a ratification of her values and principles, but she doesn’t really want to BE president.

3. Governor Palin is content with her present role. She can endorse and support good candidates, speak out on issues she cares about, and exercise substantial influence. This is an appealing position where she can maintain her family responsibilities without the horrors of running and being forced to make deals and compromises.

I predict she will make her announcement about not running this September. In the meantime, she gets to have her views widely known and may help to determine the nominee.


25 posted on 05/24/2011 7:09:01 PM PDT by saltus (God's Will be done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott

I think you make a terrific point that Sarah is unannounced and enthusiasm will return if she announces. Thanks for the reply.


26 posted on 05/24/2011 7:27:11 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: saltus

Bookmarked


27 posted on 05/24/2011 9:18:54 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If Sarah Palin really was unelectable, state-run media would be begging the GOP to nominate her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: saltus
1) Wrong.

2) Wrong.

3) Wrong.

4) Wrong.

Movie re-introduces Mrs. Palin to Iowa caucus attenders in a very favorable light and it's the perfect launch vehicle for a presidential campaign.

28 posted on 05/25/2011 6:18:55 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If Sarah Palin really was unelectable, state-run media would be begging the GOP to nominate her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It doesn’t “piss me off.”

I also fail to see how supporting Cain makes one a “troll.”

This is an interesting analysis. I’d like to see more polls to back it up though.


29 posted on 05/26/2011 7:02:36 AM PDT by RockinRight (Cain/McCotter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott
Well said.


Sarah Is Indomitable

30 posted on 05/26/2011 7:07:55 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: saltus

Sounds quite plausible.

I’ll add this: As a Cain supporter, one of the greatest ways for Cain to end up on top is a Palin endorsement. A lot of Palin supporters, upon finding that she’s not running, would have nowhere to go, but if she recommended Cain they’d pay attention. He’d rocket to the top.


31 posted on 05/26/2011 7:09:40 AM PDT by RockinRight (Cain/McCotter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson