Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs
You pretty much make the argument that if she doesnt run then ‘she did it all for the money and fun’ the past two years...

Please don't make that assumption. I'm making no such argument.

If Sarah decides not to run, it will be because some new and unforeseen factor entered the picture for her - not because she never intended to run in the first place.

As I said before, anyone who's watched through the lens of political strategy over these last two years, can't help but conclude that she's been steadily executing a masterful plan.

Unless a person looks at her actions through that lens, little of it makes sense, and can even look for all the world that she's simply enjoying herself. Nothing could be further from the truth. She's got her eye on something a lot bigger than celebrity, or money.

Listen carefully to everything she's saying, and it should become apparent.

59 posted on 05/27/2011 10:22:00 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier
RE :"If Sarah decides not to run, it will be because some new and unforeseen factor entered the picture for her - not because she never intended to run in the first place."

Like what? You already made the case that you decided she is running because she isnt doing this for 'money and fun'. What possible reason could she give that you will accept for her giving up on 'saving the country' as you say she is, by running for president?

61 posted on 05/27/2011 10:31:22 PM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson