They're a bunch of angry young men.
Posted on 05/31/2011 11:18:28 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The media is in a frenzy and elite pundits are all atwitter. Why? Because Sarah Palin refuses to let them define her. As Palin puts it, "I don't owe the media anything."
The political and media elites on both left and right are rising up in anger at former Governor Sarah Palin. Stories abound, all negative, about this American citizen whose message resonates with ordinary citizens yet doesn't conform to the current political and media template.
By all rights, Palin should be kowtowing to the media. Doesn't she know that? Instead, this upstart dares to ignore the unwritten rules governing political behavior. Palin is playing by her own rules and that just isn't done.
In the elite world of the old media, any contender for public office must give due deference to the unwritten and ever-changing rules of political correctness. The sacred cows of diversity, multiculturalism, and social justice cannot be ignored. And the media is the only one allowed to define the issues (thereby winning the debate by default).
But Sarah Palin has her own agenda. And whatever her agenda is, it most certainly doesn't fit into the template the media and political elites have insisted upon. This is not only unacceptable; it is downright dangerous.
When Palin resigned as Governor of Alaska, the media immediately defined her decision as a failure to fulfill the obligations of her office. That was only explanation the media allowed the American public to consider. Palin, seeing the writing on the wall after months of negative and scurrilous attacks by the media, rightly deduced that her remaining time in office would be spent countering frivolous legal and media attacks instead of governing. So she quit.
Palin understood that while in public office, one is constrained by politics and media. One must play by certain unwritten rules, rules that would have deliberately silenced or distorted her message. She rightly deduced that she was in a lose-lose situation. She exited the political arena. She refused to play the game, knowing the deck was stacked against her. I call her decision courageous and I applaud her.
Conservative columnist and author Ben Shapiro sums it up best:
Television made Barack Obama. Television supported bigger and bigger government, from Welfare to health care; pushed abortion-on-demand and the radical gay agenda into the mainstream; it stumped against war and for meaningless buzzwords like diversity and dangerous buzzwords like multiculturalism. Television has done more to change the politics of our nation than simple politics has.
Sarah Palin realizes this. The media is not on her side. And she rightly refuses to give them the ability to define her. She is more than capable of defining herself, through her own words and actions. She has the courage of her convictions and, thanks to social media, the ability to convey them, unfiltered by a hostile press. No wonder the press hates her.
The media, like me, has no idea what Sarah Palin's agenda is. Lacking concrete facts, the media automatically assumes her motives include gaining political power. They have completely overlooked the fact that Palin already has more than enough influence and political power to participate (and possibly prevail) in our national debate. That this influence is not subject to constraints from either politicians or the media is unprecedented. And dangerous.
I believe Palin realizes that real change is almost impossible within the existing political system. It could be argued that right now, Sarah Palin has more ability to influence political outcomes than does the president of the United States. So why should she play by rules that have been set up by those already in power, rules that are designed to keep them in power? Rules that place her at a great disadvantage?
Palin is like millions of Americans. Americans who are tired of the futile attempts to change the system from within. I believe Palin's goal is the goal of millions -- to bring about positive change. And she has found that one does not have to be an elected official in order to do this. She directly threatens the status quo and the good old boy system. If she continues to prevail, she will prove it is possible to be effective working outside the system. And this cannot be allowed.
Palin has rightly decided not to kowtow to the media and political elites. Her tactics and message resonate with a large segment of America. The segment that still believes in the greatness of America and the ability of individuals to accomplish the impossible.
Palin proves it is possible to change the system from without. She proves it is possible for one un-elected American to effect real change. Just think what would happen if others decided to follow her example. No wonder the elites hate her.
Then the first sentence of your post is an unvarnished lie.
Look, I'm not one of Palin's bigger fans, but I absolutely love the way she tweaks the news media and refuses to play their little "gotcha" games. It's perhaps her best quality.
Media is just one tool of Sorosians. Watch out for the rest!
Give 'im both barrels, Onyx! That stinker!
LMAO!!!
Happy Wednesday!
8^D
Unlike Schwarzenegger the Kennedys and others that will hide any scandal or lie to stay in power.
Excellent analysis. She doesn’t need the media & it’s driving them nuts!
She can do that all that stuff she wants as a non-candidate but I guarantee you, with a 60% disapproval rating, there are a lot of people who are turned off by her style MORE than her policies.
I say that because other conservatives with similar policy positions don’t have anywhere near the negatives that Palin does. Take Michele Bachmann for instance.
For me, it’s the fingernails-on-the-blackboard voice that does it. Get her a little agitated and she turns it on reflexibly. Get her more than a little agitated and she turns into a hysterical harpy.
She reminds me way too much of my ex-wife screeching at me to do this or that chore when a rational tone of voice would have gotten much better results.
It’s not helpful for female politicians to make male voters think of their ex-wives.
I suspect that the largest reason for objections against Sarah is due to misogyny. I see that in Krauthammer's objections to her. He would never have the same objections toward a male candidate.
Nothing sentimental about it. And I HATE NO ONE.
I thought I made that clear.
I cannot stand shrieking harridans either in public or private. Act that way as a “leader” and I predict that you will make enemies everywhere you go.
But I believe Palin realizes that herself which is why I think she knows better than to run.
Nothing sentimental about it. And I HATE NO ONE.
I thought I made that clear.
I cannot stand shrieking harridans either in public or private. Act that way as a “leader” and I predict that you will make enemies everywhere you go.
But I believe Palin realizes that herself which is why I think she knows better than to run.
“I would rather be governed by the first 2000 people in the Manhattan phone book than the entire faculty of Harvard.”
William Buckley
Sarah Palin is to me, one of the first 2000.
“She can do that all that stuff she wants as a non-candidate but I guarantee you, with a 60% disapproval rating, there are a lot of people who are turned off by her style MORE than her policies.”
Firstly, those polls are not to be trusted.
Secondly, her high disapproval numbers are due more to something mentioned in the article—”Stories abound, all negative, about this American citizen whose message resonates with ordinary citizens yet doesn’t conform to the current political and media template.”—than to anything she has said or done.
The media have been red in fang and claw since 2008 in their attempts to dirty her reputation, and some people have been taken in.
Allow me please to quote Oswald Spengler from “Decline of the West, Volume II,” authorized translation, 1928:
“What is truth? For the multitude, that which it continually reads and hears. A forlorn little drop may settle somewhere and collect grounds on which to determine “The Truth”—but what it obtains is just its truth. The other, the public truth of the moment, which alone matters for effects and successes in the fact-world, is today a product of the press. What the press wills, is true. Its commanders evoke, transform, interchange truths. Three weeks of press work, and the truth is acknowledged by everybody....A more appalling caricature of freedom of thought cannot be imagined. Formerly a man did not dare to think freely. Now, he dares, but cannot; his will to think is only a willingness to think to order, and this is what he feels is HIS liberty.”
I will say this: the voice she uses to address screaming crowds is not her normal voice. Her normal voice is actually quite nice. Whoever is advising her to use that voice should be fired immediately.
They're a bunch of angry young men.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.