Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nikos1121
True, but who would they vote for otherwise? Obama? I think not.

The independent voter who does not vote is every bit as harmful and dangerous as if they voted for the stain. Make no mistake about that. In fact, the stain's handlers and campaign managers are and will continue to work very hard disparaging and wrecking any conservative candidate they feel is gaining real traction with the independent voter block. They are aware most of them would never vote FOR the stain. So...they will do all in their power to get them to stay home on election day.

He’s back in the minus 11 range and has been for weeks. No bounce. If I may paraphrase a song, "It's a long, long way...from June to November...." Also, today, June 2, 2011, Rassmusen has the stain's "Total Approval" rating sitting comfortably at 48.5%, exactly where it's been since mid year '09. If this rating does not drop...AND REMAIN...below 36%, the stain (and his entire regime) will remain in power until 2016.

16 posted on 06/02/2011 5:26:48 AM PDT by Logic n' Reason (The stain must be ERADICATED....NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Logic n' Reason; SMARTY

After 8 years of Clinton, I was thrilled to get Bush over Gore. I understand the sentiment of having to throw out Obama, but we have to accept the fact that Bush did NOT clean the STAIN on Clinton from America.

Clinton should have gone down for Waco or the Chi-com treason WAY before the Lewinsky mess.

We HAVE to elect a reformer third party if the GOP gives us another establishment RINO.


20 posted on 06/02/2011 5:35:40 AM PDT by MikeSteelBe ( "Failure to speak out against evil is evil itself" - Dietrich Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson