Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Republican Who Can Win : Someone who know Americans are more worried about jobs and savings
Wall Street Journal ^ | 06/03/2011 | Dorothy Rabinowitz

Posted on 06/03/2011 11:22:44 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

The candidate would know Americans are more worried about their jobs and their savings than abstractions like 'big government.'

To win the presidency in 2012, the Republican candidate will require certain strengths. Among them, a credible passion for ideas other than cost-cutting and small government. He or she will have to speak in the voice of Americans who know in their bones the extraordinary character of their democracy, and that voice will have to ring out steadily. That Republican candidate will need, no less, the ability to talk about matters like Medicare and Social Security without terrorizing the electorate.

Americans already have plenty of cause for fear. They have on one side the Obama health-care plan now nearly universally acknowledged as a disaster. A plan that entails huge cuts in health care—$500 billion cut from Medicare—that will nevertheless cause no pain, according to its architects. As the polls on ObamaCare show, this grand scheme appears mostly to have alarmed Americans.

From the Republican side comes an incessant barrage of doomsday messages and proclamations that the nation is imperiled by the greatest crisis in a generation—not, as we might have supposed, by our ongoing, desperate unemployment levels, but by spending on social programs. No sane person will deny the necessity of finding ways to cut the costs of these programs. But it's impossible not to hear in the clamor for boldness—for massive cuts in entitlements—a distinctly fevered tone, and one with an unmistakable ideological tinge. Not the sort of pragmatism that inspires voter confidence.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; elections; gop; jobs; potus; savings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
ANYONE AGREE WITH THE AUTHOR's PREMISE AS WRITTEN HERE:


The Republican who wants to win would avoid talk of the costs that our spendthrift ways, particularly benefits like Social Security, are supposedly heaping on future generations. He would especially avoid painting images of the pain Americans feel at burdening their children and grandchildren. This high-minded talk, rooted in fantasy, isn't going to warm the hearts of voters of mature age—and they are legion—who feel no such pain. None. And they don't like being told that they do, or that they should feel it, or that they're stealing from the young. They've spent their working lives paying in to Social Security, their investment. Adjustments have to be made to the system, as they now know. Which makes it even more unlikely they'll welcome handwringing about the plight of future generations.

The Republican who wins will have to know, and show that he knows, that most Americans aren't sitting around worried to death about big government—they're worried about jobs and what they have in savings.

1 posted on 06/03/2011 11:22:49 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

DOROTHY YOU ARE A DEMOCRAT.

You are in some other world that does not understand business.

Or most Americans and how they live.

You need to get out of NYC once in a while.


2 posted on 06/03/2011 11:28:35 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (Huguenot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Translation: “The Republican who can win can only be one who does not the truth”


3 posted on 06/03/2011 11:29:25 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (The more the plans fail the more the planners plan - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

That should read “tell the truth”


4 posted on 06/03/2011 11:30:19 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (The more the plans fail the more the planners plan - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
most Americans aren't sitting around worried to death about big government—they're worried about jobs and what they have in savings

Anyone who doesn't understand the connection between the former and the latter shouldn't be allowed to vote.

5 posted on 06/03/2011 11:30:32 AM PDT by kevkrom (Palin's detractors now resort to "nobody believes she can win because nobody believes she can win")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In other words a demagogue might win. Good insight Dorthy. That’s why they pay you the big bucks.


6 posted on 06/03/2011 11:31:20 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"To win the presidency in 2012, the Republican candidate will require certain strengths. Among them, a credible passion for ideas other than cost-cutting and small government."

Sorry, but I call FAIL.

To win the presidency in 2012, the Republican candidate will have to place cost-cutting and small government as their first priority.

That is the monster that is killing America, and has been for over 70 years.

7 posted on 06/03/2011 11:31:43 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He’s right. Americans are more worried abou their jobs than “abstract” things like Big Government. But they are also smart enough to know that Big Government demands more of our paycheck than anything else.

So, we can keep Big Government if Big Government is willing to hold a lot of Bake Sales to pay for entitlements.

Otherwise, it can stay out of my wallet and perhaps it could start telling the welfare class to make do with less, and to do some belt-tightening, as it continuously tells the working class.


8 posted on 06/03/2011 11:32:21 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (We don't need to win elections. We need to win a revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Translation: Americans are stupid.


9 posted on 06/03/2011 11:32:59 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
Anyone who doesn't understand the connection between the former and the latter shouldn't be allowed to vote.

But they do vote and the Republican candidate will have to find a way to appeal to them as Reagan did.

10 posted on 06/03/2011 11:36:07 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It is all the more CRITICAL IN 2012 that we have a TRUTH-TELLING candidate. I’d rather lose than lie, and not just for ethical reasons. Also, there’s this:

IF OBAMA WINS BECAUSE HE LIES AND THE CONSERVATIVE WON’T, then history and the voters are much more likely to blame Obama — and voters are more likely to vote for conservative reforms in the future (if it’s not too late by then ...).


11 posted on 06/03/2011 11:36:47 AM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The candidate would know Americans are more worried about their jobs and their savings than abstractions like 'big government.

Bullshit. Big government ain't no abstraction. Big government is what's driving our economy into the ground.

The GOP candidate who can tap into this sentiment against big government will gain enormous traction.

The economy will begin to turn around ONLY when people are buoyed by the knowledge that runaway government spending, and its associated Tyrannies, has been stopped dead in its tracks.

12 posted on 06/03/2011 11:40:42 AM PDT by sargon (I don't like the sound of these "boncentration bamps")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

Actually, one poster above said it right...

To the author of this article, The Republican who can win can only be someone who does not/is afraid to tell the truth regarding the REAL state of our country and economy.

If this is true, no wonder this country is in trouble. Americans prefer to be in denial and vote for those who will KEEP us in denial.

That this article will validate this kind of attitude only serves to confirms that fact.


13 posted on 06/03/2011 11:41:24 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Dorothy is not talking to us or about us, but of voters who are actually as she described. There are exactly those out there who could be Republican voters in 2012, but they are not us. They are but culturally religious, or not at all, and react only to their own benefit, not patriotism, not philosphy.

The question is do we want this block of votes if it takes them to actually WIN?


14 posted on 06/03/2011 11:42:35 AM PDT by RitaOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
No sane person will deny the necessity of finding ways to cut the costs of these programs.

Ergo, all Democrats are insane but because not a one of them will talk about cuts to entitlements and several Republicans will not go there either. But, Dorothy. It gets no simpler than this. J-O-B-S. If I was running for President I would tell the voters if they elect me and give me Republican control of both Houses I would guarantee unemployment below 7% by the end of my first term or I would not run for a second.

15 posted on 06/03/2011 11:46:34 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“After all the years of instruction, all the textbooks on U.S. rapacity and greed, all the college lectures on the evil and injustice the U.S. had supposedly visited on the world, something inside these young rose up to tell them they were Americans. That something lies in the hearts of Americans across the land and it is those hearts to which the candidate will have to speak.”

I think the author’s point is that being AGAINST something is NOT ENOUGH.

You have to be FOR something else - something better.

I think some of the commentors are missing the point of this piece - or I could be wrong.


16 posted on 06/03/2011 11:49:14 AM PDT by ZULU (Lindsey Graham is a nanometrical pustule of pusillanimous putrescence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Other than hiring people the only things the government can do about jobs is indirect - the government can remove the barriers to enterprise that various organizations have erected.
That’s smaller government...


17 posted on 06/03/2011 11:51:29 AM PDT by Little Ray (Best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The job bit goes way beyond jobs. After all, we have million of teachers and government workers slurping up pension monies with more to come.

THE SYSTEM HAS TO BE CHANGED!!

It means cutting back government jobs and promoting the private sector.

It means a reality check on future pensions. NO COLLECTING UNTIL YOU'RE 62!!!!

18 posted on 06/03/2011 11:53:56 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
So Dorothy, is this how things work in Oz? You are clearly not in KS any more. Did you consult Toto or the flying monkeys before you wrote this piece?


19 posted on 06/03/2011 11:54:01 AM PDT by NWFLConservative (Game On!.................Saracuda 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
talk about matters like Medicare and Social Security without terrorizing the electorate. Americans... Dear Dorothy: One of the many ways in which you embarrassed yourself in this piece.
20 posted on 06/03/2011 11:55:19 AM PDT by fightinJAG (I am sick of people adding their comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson