Muslim Woman Seeks to Revive Institution of Sex-Slaver

Front Page ^ | June 6 2011 | Raymond Ibrahim

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

Last week witnessed popular Muslim preacher Abu Ishaq al-Huwaini boast about how Islam allows Muslims to buy and sell conquered infidel women, so that "When I want a sex-slave, I go to the market and pick whichever female I desire and buy her."

This week's depraved anachronism comes from a Muslim woman—Salwa al-Mutairi, a political activist and former parliamentary candidate for Kuwait's government, no less: She, too, seeks to "revive the institution of sex-slavery."

A brief English report appeared over the weekend in the Kuwait Times (nothing, of course, in the MSM):

Muslim men who fear being seduced or tempted into immoral behavior by the beauty of their female servants, or even of those servants "casting spells" on them, would be better to purchase women from an "enslaved maid" agency for sexual purposes. She [Mutairi] suggested that special offices could be set up to provide concubines in the same way as domestic staff recruitment agencies currently provide housemaids. "We want our youth to be protected from adultery," said al-Mutairi, suggesting that these maids could be brought as prisoners of war in war-stricken nations like Chechnya to be sold on later to devout merchants.

The Arabic news website, Al Arabiya, has the sordid details, including a video of Mutairi addressing this topic. I summarize and translate various excerpts below (note: I am not making any of this up):

The Kuwaiti female activist begins by insisting that "it's of course true" that "the prophet of Islam legitimized sex-slavery." She recounts how when she was in Mecca, Islam's holiest city, she asked various sheikhs and muftis (learned, authoritative Muslims) about the legality of sex-slavery according to Sharia: they all confirmed it to be perfectly legal; Kuwaiti ulema further pointed out that extra "virile" men—Western synonyms include "sex-crazed," "lecherous," "perverted"—would do well to purchase sex-slaves to sate their appetites without sinning.

Here's a particularly interesting excerpt from her taped speech on the rules governing sex-slaves:

A Muslim state must [first] attack a Christian state—sorry, I mean any non-Muslim state—and they [the women, the future sex-slaves] must be captives of the raid. Is this forbidden? Not at all; according to Islam, sex slaves are not at all forbidden. Quite the contrary, the rules regulating sex-slaves differ from those for free women [i.e., Muslim women]: the latter's body must be covered entirely, except for her face and hands, whereas the sex-slave is kept naked from the bellybutton on up—she is different from the free woman; the free woman has to be married properly to her husband, but the sex-slave—he just buys her and that's that.

She went on to offer concrete suggestions: "For example, in the Chechnyan war, surely there are female Russian captives. So go and buy those and sell them here in Kuwait; better that than have our men engage in forbidden sexual relations. I don't see any problem in this, no problem at all."

Mutairi suggests the enslaved girls be at least 15 years-old.

She further justified the institution of sex-slavery by evoking 8th century caliph, Harun Rashid—a name some may recall from Arabian Nights bedtime stories; a name some may be surprised to discover politically active Muslims modeling their lives after:

"And the greatest example we have is Harun al-Rashid: when he died, he had 2,000 sex slaves—so it's okay, nothing wrong with it."

Mutairi's rationale is ultimately guided by a sense of efficiency, a desire for the good of society: legalizing sex-slaves helps prevent Muslim men from transgressing Allah's laws (as we have seen, extramarital relations with fellow Muslim women is strictly forbidden, but not with infidel sex-slaves, since they are scarcely considered human). Thus, the institution of sex-slavery provides a convenient, Sharia-compliant way of satiating the libidinous urges of Muslim men.

The Kuwaiti activist's blunt approach actually has universal parallels. For example, in the West, some seek to legalize marijuana, arguing that, since people use it anyway, let it be made compliant with the law. In the Muslim world, we have those who seek to legalize sex-slavery, arguing that, since Muslim men will use women anyway, let it be made compliant with Sharia law.

Such are the inevitable differences between the Western mindset (based on reason and universal rights) and the Sharia mindset (based on the life of a 7th century Arabian caravan-raider and slave-trader).

Mutairi concluded by piously supplicating Allah: "Oh I truly wish this for Kuwait, Allah willing—Oh Lord, Lord, you are bountiful…"

While she waits, Mutairi can take solace in the fact that, if sex-slavery is not institutionalized in Kuwait, it thrives underground throughout the Muslim world, where non-Muslim girls—mostly Christians—are routinely abducted, enslaved, and forced into lives of unspeakable degradation.

After all, just because a practice is not formally institutionalized does not mean that those who deem it their divine right are not practicing it.

[eclecticEel]

The West may pat itself on the back for effectively stamping out the ancient institution of slavery, but the odds are at best 50/50 that the reprieve is only temporary.

[James C. Bennett]

Sick, amoral animals.

Their Quran is the anarchist's manual.

They also institute something known as a “temporary marriage” - a form of “legalised” prostitution where they “marry” the hooker for a couple of hours.

Add to that, the “triple Talaq” where a man can divorce a wife if he utters “talaq” three times. It's a legal procedure for divorce in Muslim hell-holes.

Islam should not only be banned, it should be extirpated. Destroying the Kaaba, for starters, will bring down a couple of “pillars” of their false faith. Nazism wasn't tolerated, so why is this?

[Norm Lenhart]

I will never understand how any father or husband in all of western civilization can sit with a straight face and say that they do not feel a burning desire to physically dismember these pieces of human garbage. I just do not get it. Everything about that ‘religion runs counter to everything that is good and decent in the world. Everything.

Dan Simmons had a short story on his blog that I have referred to before (fictional) about the result of the spread of islam...

http://www.dansimmons.com/news/message/2006_04.htm

I recommend it highly, if for no other reason than a point to ponder.

[piytar]

Remember, islam means submission, not peace.

And the demon called allah (my bet? Azazael) does not state that he loves his people even ONCE in the Quaran. In fact, I believe the word “love” doesn’t appear once in that obomanation.

[rdcbn]

Somewhere I read the phrase, “By their fruits, you shall know them”

[James C. Bennett]

I’ve lived in Los Angeles, and visit the city frequently.

The number of Halal outlets, shady backyard mosques, and ghettoes truly cannot bode well for these parts.

[James C. Bennett]

Thanks for the link, by the way!

[DB]

“The Kuwaiti activist’s blunt approach actually has universal parallels. For example, in the West, some seek to legalize marijuana, arguing that, since people use it anyway, let it be made compliant with the law. In the Muslim world, we have those who seek to legalize sex-slavery, arguing that, since Muslim men will use women anyway, let it be made compliant with Sharia law.”

That’s total BS.

There’s a huge difference between abusing yourself and abusing others.

That seriously taints whatever else this author has to say.

[Ronin]

I’m wondering if she is seriously in favor of this, or if she was using this example to demonstrate the absurdity of Sharai Law in a way the Imans and fanatics could not object to.

If it was, she mousetrapped them nicely.

[Norm Lenhart]

I’m a voracious reader of Sci-fi and Horror. I particularly love Sci-fi that’s ‘just ahead’ of where we are now and the whole ‘What if’ thing.

That Simmons short story is one of the best I have ever read.

[verklaring]

Thanks for posting

For one who has studied Islam, the Hadith etc. This is not a joke. It is very real.

This is what Muhammad did, from Median to Mecca, adding concubine (sex-slave) to concubine. The targets were then: Jews and Christians, they still are.

[BigIsleGal]

Thanks for bringing up that point, I had to read it a couple times to make sure I was reading it properly.
Try comparing this sharian sham to selling childrns to peedofiles. <sp /s

[Puckster]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsaPQ8jOqGo

And then they will kill the babies that are born of slave women.

They will castrate slave men of races, primarily black, that the deem inferior.

There is no wondering why Nazi’s and Arabs were allied.

[dcwusmc]

Bump...

[rawcatslyentist]

Nazism wasn't tolerated, so why is this?

Because they worship the same gawd as commies.

Yes we can, Thank You Satan 1:50

[Puckster]

“Nazism wasn't tolerated, so why is this?
Because they worship the same gawd as commies.

Yes we can, Thank You Satan 1:50”

I have viewed the video once before, probably posted by you, and the sad aspect of this is that all agreements with hell and death are already null and void.

There is only utter self annihilation in the direction they are going.....condemned of themselves.

[Yorlik803]

To some people, submission is better than peace. Submitting mean no mean hard desicions, no more worrying about stuff like getting a job, food and other things. All that will be provided by your new masters.
A lot of real men and women will perish to prevent these dogs from achieving their goals.

[Pollster1]

Jabba the Hut was classier and more decent than these people.

[CalvaryJohn]

In Islam, adultery is forbidden, but sex slaves are OK. Lying is forbidden, but is OK to spread Islam. (Taquiah). Interest is forbidden, but a “fee” for the loan is OK. I am sensing a pattern here.