Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Queen Makes Philip Head Of The Royal Navy
Sky News ^ | 10th June 2011 | Paul Harrison

Posted on 06/11/2011 12:51:33 AM PDT by naturalman1975

On his 90th birthday, the Queen has honoured her husband, the Duke of Edinburgh, with the title of the Lord High Admiral of the Navy - a role that, until now, was hers.

The office of the Lord High Admiral dates from the 14th century and has been held by the Queen since 1964.

She has now handed it over to her husband as he celebrates his milestone age and in recognition of the fact that he gave up his promising naval career to devote his life to royal duty and support his wife in her role as Sovereign.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.sky.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: dukeofedinburgh; elizabeth; queenelizabeth; thequeen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: naturalman1975

This is what comes from doing a splendid job of polishing the handles of the big front door at Buckingham Palace.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLIyWcxPlEU&feature=related


21 posted on 06/11/2011 4:09:30 AM PDT by Cheburashka (Democratic Underground: The Hogwarts of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tredegar

Trooping the Colour is always a great spectacle. I never knew the drum horses were the only animals to hold commissions in the army.


22 posted on 06/11/2011 4:16:52 AM PDT by MadMitch (nemo me impune lacessit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: derllak

Yup: Same as those medals on his chest are for decoration only.


23 posted on 06/11/2011 4:37:35 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Yup: Same as those medals on his chest are for decoration only.

I hope that's sarcasm: IIRC, he earned most of them in WW2.

24 posted on 06/11/2011 4:51:30 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
Who CARES about all this "Royal" shiite?

It is as RIDICULOUS as "the knights who say, 'Ni!'".

25 posted on 06/11/2011 4:54:29 AM PDT by DocH (Official Right-Wing Extremist Veteran Seal Of Approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocH

Quite a few people care about it, including for some reason I can’t always fathom quite a few Americans.

But to me, more important here is the acknowledgement of a man who has served his country - and not just his country - for, literally seven decades at this point, in a wide variety of different roles. I think that is worthy of respect and honour.


26 posted on 06/11/2011 5:00:52 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
I know it’s popular to run down the British military capability, but the Royal Navy could still match the combat strength of any Navy except the US Navy - and as it’s unlikely it will need to match the combat strength of the US Navy in the near future, that is probably sufficient for most purposes.

It's not the number of ships, but what the nation can actually do with them.

The RN can wage an effective nuclear deterrence (Vanguard-class SSBNs). They can engage in effective anti-submarine actions. They can do maritime protection/escort and anti-shipping ops.

What they can't really do at the moment is effective power-projection and any sort of operation that requires carrier-based fixed-wing airpower (such as providing organic aircover and support for those brand spanking new amphibs they have).

Ironic, therefore, that the first new military op they engage in (Libya) after giving up their carrier airpower is of exactly the sort that HIGHLIGHTS their self-imposed deficiency.

If the Argentinians both wanted (they do) and had the capability (which they really don't at this point) to retake the Falklands the Brits could simply not stage the kind of operation they did with Corporate in 1982. Hopefully memories of HMSes Prince of Wales and Repulse in 1942 are still fresh enough that they wouldn't try.
27 posted on 06/11/2011 5:11:30 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Grut; Venturer
He had a rather distinguished, if brief Naval Career. No HMS Pinafore about him, he was the real deal. He graduated first in his class from the Royal Naval College, and three years later was made one of he youngest first lieutenants in the Royal Navy. He saw significant combat in the Pacific and in the Mediterranean, where he distinguished himself by his initiative and leadership.
28 posted on 06/11/2011 5:13:29 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing its idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Grut; Venturer
Indeed he did.

The painting is a little out of date - but let's look at what he's wearing there.

Around his neck, he wears the red cross of the Order of Merit, which is given personally by the Queen for "distinguished service in the armed forces, science, art, literature, or for the promotion of culture." Personally I would say that in seventy years of serving the United Kingdom in all of those areas (in some cases directly, in others as a facilitator) he has earned that, but it could certainly be argued he had those opportunities because of his marriage.

The large star under his medals is the Star of the Most Noble Order of the Garter (the blue sash he wears is also a symbol of that Order). This is the oldest British (and English) Order of Knighthood and that is something he hasn't really earned - it's given to senior members of the Royal Family as a matter of tradition. It's intended to honour the other recipients who did earn the Honour by making its prestige obvious.

With those two out of the way, move on to his actual medals.

The first five of those (the star shaped ones) are campaign medals that he received for his service as an ordinary naval officer during the Second World War. He served from 1940 to 1945 all over the world, and he earned every one of those campaign stars in the same way any other British or Commonwealth servicemen earned them - by fighting in that war. 1939-1945 Star (with Oak Leaf), the Africa Star, the Atlantic Star, the Burma Star (with Pacific Rosette), and the Italy Star. He was an Officer Cadet when the war began and was commissioned in January 1940. He served all over the world right up to the end of the war - he was in Tokyo Bay when the Japanese signed the surrender. His other medals are mostly minor ceremonial medals that tens of thousands of British servicemen have that he earned in the same way they did.

29 posted on 06/11/2011 5:15:31 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
What they can't really do at the moment is effective power-projection and any sort of operation that requires carrier-based fixed-wing airpower (such as providing organic aircover and support for those brand spanking new amphibs they have).

True - but very few countries can do that - and the ones that really can are British allies. And while Britain can't, right at this moment, that should be a reasonably short term state of affairs. It is certainly not an ideal situation to be without proper carrier aviation for any period of time but unless Britain goes to war against the US or France, the lack isn't critical from a defensive point of view.

In terms of the Falklands, the changes made to the defences of those islands since 1982 mean there should never be any need for that type of operation again - they are guarded by a lot more than a company of Royal Marines nowadays and there are runways that allow for reinforcement if necessary.

30 posted on 06/11/2011 5:26:46 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

“...the longest-serving consort in British history...”

Now that really is a funny statment.


31 posted on 06/11/2011 6:09:51 AM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grut

So I was informed. My apologies.


32 posted on 06/11/2011 6:48:21 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Ha! Ha! Ha!

That was a good one! This matches up with what Prince Phillip said “The English Aristocracy is not snobbish. We have been known to marry chorus girls, even AMERICANS!!”

Points to fellow Freepers who know what this joke is about


33 posted on 06/11/2011 6:52:35 AM PDT by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

LOL! That’ll leave a mark.


34 posted on 06/11/2011 6:55:40 AM PDT by Vor Lady (The Lord will turn the arena of suffering into a platform of opportunity. R. Zacharias)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tredegar

That reminds me of an interview Princess Ann did right after she got married. The reporter, really snarky, asked her about her role of being a wife and if she could even “sew a button on”, referring to how pampered she was. She responded and said something like “Well, I do have a college degree, so I’m not totally useless”.... I don’t remember exactly how she worded it, but she did say the “totally useless part. I laughed so hard. She immediately became my favorite royal.


35 posted on 06/11/2011 7:04:47 AM PDT by DrewsMum (There is no other NAME whereby we may be saved....JESUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Explorer89
He is cute and seems to have a good sense of humor.
36 posted on 06/11/2011 7:19:36 AM PDT by angcat (DEAR GOD PLEASE SAVE US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Explorer89
He is cute and seems to have a good sense of humor.
37 posted on 06/11/2011 7:19:47 AM PDT by angcat (DEAR GOD PLEASE SAVE US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: angcat

Yes he’s the funniest Eugenicist in the world. My favor Prince Phillip saying is the one where he says he wishes that when he dies he could come back as a deadly virus and kill off a large part of the Earth’s population. So witty.

The guy is a sorry nazi sympathizer crudball who wants to kill off half the world’s population. He’s living proof along with George Soros that only the good die young.


38 posted on 06/11/2011 8:30:39 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
Damn!

 

 

Now I'll be hearing the HMS Pinafore Opera running through my brain!!

 

 

39 posted on 06/11/2011 8:55:11 AM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank

Remarkable parallels between the career of “the ruler of the Queen’s navy” and that of the present Commander-in-Chief of the US armed forces.


40 posted on 06/11/2011 9:52:00 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson