Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
The only people half interested in Romney are liberals.
We don’t need a new King - we need a President.
To: Halfmanhalfamazing; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Normandy; TenthAmendmentChampion; FrPR; ...
3 posted on
06/11/2011 6:22:48 AM PDT by
steelyourfaith
(If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
why do these royal dooooooshbags get off deciding OUR candidate...between coronating Mittens and asking leftist buttwipes to go through all the Palin emails to find the one fatal flaw that can sink her...these excrement need a serious attitude adjustment...and I wont be specific in what kind of adjustment...
4 posted on
06/11/2011 6:25:19 AM PDT by
Vaquero
("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
RINO Romney can go suck an egg.
5 posted on
06/11/2011 6:26:44 AM PDT by
AlexW
(Proud eligibility skeptic)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
And the MSM know what about science?
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
>>You’ve got 99.9% of the scientists in the world in one camp
Journalists, actors, teenagers, and Bono are not scientists.
8 posted on
06/11/2011 6:31:20 AM PDT by
Bryanw92
(We don't need to win elections. We need to win a revolution.)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
With liberals, when one is hired by an oil company to research drilling, etc - everything they say is tainted and must be wrong.
With liberals, when one is hired by the government to research “climate change” (which is the ONLY source of dollars for them) - everything they say is truth and must be regarded as such under penalty of branding.
Note, however, that those in the first paragraph can do many other things and earn good income. Those in the second paragraph have nothing else they can do.
Now - what results do you think will come out of that second group?
9 posted on
06/11/2011 6:32:28 AM PDT by
Da Coyote
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
CENK UYGUR:
"You've got 99.9% of the scientists in the world in one camp and Rush in the other camp. The Republican primary (snickering) is probably Limbaugh wins against all science and facts..."Well, if we're talking "prostitute" scientists, those who will sell out to Big Government grant funding to make up stuff in support of the anthropogenic global warming scam so as to cover another Big Government power grab, then he's got a point. But if he's claiming 99% of all scientists then he is just a liar and/or ignoramus.
Legions of Anthropogenic Global Warming Skeptics
- Global Warming Petition Project, also known as the Oregon Project, has been signed to date by 31,487 American scientists, including 9,029 with PhDs, and nearly 4,000 with specific training in atmospheric, earth, and environmental sciences. All signers have the necessary training in physics, chemistry, and mathematics to understand and evaluate the scientific data relevant to the human-caused global warming hypothesis and to the effects of human activities upon environmental quality. Signatories reject the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis based on human release of any and all greenhouse gases including methane and CO2.
- Statement by Atmospheric Scientists on Greenhouse Warming signed by 47 scientists against the highly uncertain scientific theories being used to support global environmental regulations in anticipation of the Earth Summit (Brazil 1992). FEBRUARY 27, 1992
- THE LEIPZIG DECLARATION ON GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE originally a prebuttal to the 1997 Kyoto Climate Treaty Conference. It has 105 signatories. (1995, 1997, revised 2005)
- The CATO Institute Climate Change Ad signed by 115 scientists, mostly PhDs. Ad in pdf form. March 30, 2009
- 141 Scientists Sign Letter Sent to UN Secretary-General Questioning Global Warming stating that the science behind anthropogenic global warming is anything but "settled". December 8, 2009
- U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claim Over 700 dissenting scientists to date from around the globe challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. Initially released December 2007. UPDATE: 1000 signatories as of 8 Dec 10.
- Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change approximately 1000 endorsers of the International Climate Science Coalition, March 2-4, 2008.
- Memorandum submitted by the Institute of Physics The Institute of Physics, with a worldwide membership of over 36,000, has submitted a memorandum to the U.K. Parliament in which they excoriate the CRU as an affront to the integrity of science, as well as decry the corrupt peer review process in climatology that has evolved to support the anthropogenic global warming fraud. February 2010
- More than 60 German Scientists Dissent Over Global Warming Claims in an open letter to German Chancellor. The more than 60 signers of the letter include several United Nations IPCC scientists. The scientists declared that global warming has become a pseudo religion and they noted that rising CO2 has had no measurable effect on temperatures. The German scientists, also wrote that the UN IPCC has lost its scientific credibility." August 9, 2009
|
12 posted on
06/11/2011 6:37:49 AM PDT by
steelyourfaith
(If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
NOT going to support RINO Romney even if he buys the nomination.
Just say NO to RINOs.
To: Halfmanhalfamazing; steelyourfaith
It is a palpable conflict of interest for the federal government to fund grants for studies that essentially invite more government. No surprise that a larger portion of so called scientists indulge groupthink when it comes to the concept of MMGW. The entire grant process needs review and revision to the extent it is assessed in terms of whether it will truly benefit the people or take away their invividual liberties.
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Thanks to Rush Limbaugh, all of these Republican candidates are terrified of reaching out to mainstream voters.And the MSM tries to scare voters into accepting RINOs. The real problem is that many "conservatives" will also bite and make excuses about why we need to try for a "moderate" candidate. Almost as bad as the "purists" who insist all 100 conservative boxes must be checked or they will stay home.
20 posted on
06/11/2011 7:03:16 AM PDT by
trebb
("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Mitt Romney Wins Over Media......
Because "winning over the media" worked out so well for McCain....
22 posted on
06/11/2011 7:04:17 AM PDT by
slumber1
(Don't taze me bro!)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Rush could do the American people the greatest service of his career by hammering Romney. Over and over. There’s so much at stake and we simply can’t afford Myth’s brand of liberalism.
23 posted on
06/11/2011 7:06:21 AM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
("Mr. Romney and Mr. Obama are not rivals, they're running mates." - Rep. Thaddeus McCotter)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I don’t think there are enough voters in the “media” to win him the GOP nomination. Americans are not going to allow the commie left in the “media” to give us the bum’s rush with Romney like they did when they nominated McCain. We’ll be chosing our own candidate this time.
26 posted on
06/11/2011 7:13:05 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
("...that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,..")
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Romney:
Believe in man-global warming
Pro amnesty
Pro state run healthcare
Pro gun control
Another McCain is not needed
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Romney:
Believe in man-global warming
Pro amnesty
Pro state run healthcare
Pro gun control
Another McCain is not needed
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Romney:
Believe in man-global warming
Pro amnesty
Pro state run healthcare
Pro gun control
Another McCain is not needed
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
The Republican Media Candidate. That always works out well.
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
This will come down to Romney & Pawlenty. Unless Palin or Perry get in. Either of them wup Romney or Pawlenty easily.
37 posted on
06/11/2011 8:38:34 AM PDT by
wny
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Romney showed his true colors back in the 2008 IOWA GOP debate. The famous “Show of hands” question.
Q. Show of hands if you think global climate change is a serious threat and caused by human activity?
Romney’s hand shot straight up.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson