Posted on 06/11/2011 5:33:46 PM PDT by neverdem
I don't think the dude who shot Giffords and the others...was a pro gun advocate.
He was/is just nuts.
As I've pointed out for many, many years -- if we gun-owners were 1/10th the hairy-backed, knuckle-draggers they paint us to be, they would have been dead long ago.
Here's a thought, maybe the DOJ should stop the BATFE from trafficking in illegal firearms for a start.
5.56mm
>Where do we muster? Whos the CO? Which company and platoon do we report to?<
>Blowhards like you love to cut down American patriots because we havent rolled guillotines down Pennsylvania Avenue. If you took a historical measure, youd discover that it took the Founders 25 years - 1750 to 1775 - to organize, find leadership and make a plan to take on the British.<
>>Militias are outdated. Look around the world,, leaderless resistance is far better. Its extremely difficult to roll up. If you give up the luxury of a leader giving orders for this or that plan,,,you wind up with a movement that is much more to be feared.<<
When you organize military type units, sure you have fantastic firefights but who is it that gets killed? The men who decided that the firefight/war was required for defense of the nation or the patriots who love the nation?
If the same men had decided to take out the treasonous leader and the political crowd of the opposing force would that make the needed changes in how business is conducted? More than likely it would.
So now you get down to the issue of do you inform/warn them that if they don’t change their ways, they are going to experience a swift drop in body temperature or do you just go ahead and do it?
Where do you draw the line that such and such behavior is worthy of a quiet removal from Office? No public display of the bodies is required. The family will understand that broadcasts on the evening news should be kept to two short sentences. “X and XX was killed last night. We are leaving town this afternoon.”
Lots of questions, huh?
I didn’t mean to imply that he was pro-gun. I apologize.
Absolutely so. To quote the immortal words of Henry Bowman, "If you see something that needs doing, do it." Anyone who needs a playbook at this late date isn't even in the game.
Agreed. But we should welcome stragglers. We'll need as many as we can get if we want our Constitutionally limited Federal Republic back...
Aw, they'd never catch him, anyway. It'd just be another COINTELPRO hit.
Which is what I've been saying on here for a long time. Nobody did anything after the federal government passed farming laws, or all of those unconstitutional firearms laws. Nobody took a stand then, and I doubt nobody will take a stand today.
How about NFA ‘34? That was enacted far more than 25 years ago, and people still did nothing.
This is not the country George Washington fought for anymore, and it makes me sad to say it.
Do you have any idea what the current name for COINTELPRO might be? You know there has to be one operating with the Tea Party out there. LOL
They've gone by serveral alpha designations and a couple of numerical ones. but operate under T.R.A.C.
You know there has to be one operating with the Tea Party out there. LOL
I reckon they were the fellas caught stringing *telephone wring* inside the Murah Building in OKC the day before the explosion. After all, it was an FBI guy that tried to get an Arizona mob war going by starting a bombing campaign, around the time Phoenix newspaperman Dan Bolles was blown up.
It's not stupid when you consider that these same Democrats, if they are elected, now vote for most of the Obama/Reid/Pelosi agenda. It's like shooting yourself in the foot because your foot itches. The strategy is self defeating because you're not really advancing the pro-gun agenda by electing the enemy even if you think they're on your side on this issue.
What kind of man does a child grow in to when he is suspended in school for pointing his hand like a gun, or even drawing a gun on a piece of paper? This is a deliberate policy of emasculation and it's working. We have very little time left, if any.
When I was a child, around 1993-1996, all I drew were tanks and warbirds. I even remember writing this incredibly bad piece of poetry about Arafat that my teacher and parents went ballistic over; I wrote it that way mainly because of the odd name. I was never forcefully interviewed by police because of the things I drew, and that was in the NYC public education system.
You left out Oklahoma.
Then, by extension, a “single-issue” platform like the NRA’s would be similarly stupid. The NRA cannot endorse a Democrat because of what they might do on other issues, so that would negate the single-issue platform and concept.
But, the NRA IS a single-issue organization. Hedging their endorsements on other issues is simply foolish. The endorsement of the NRA should mean SOMETHING, other than a de-facto RNC stamp of approval.
I began the discussion by listing basic measures that the Brady Campaign, and others, felt could make a difference. The list included: a strong background check system, with good and complete records of dangerous and irresponsible people, applicable to all commercial gun sales; more tools for law enforcement to stop trafficking in illegal guns; increasing the number and type of military-style weapons, including “assault clips,” that should not be readily available to civilians, like machine-guns and fully automatic weapons.”
Apply this to voting. Strong background check with complete records of dangerous and irresponsible people... After all, if it’s good enough for RKBA, they have no reason not to accept it for voting.
If they can’t agree to that and implement that before moving on any more gun control, then I cannot accept anything they propose.
Thanks!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.